Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 32 condonation Court: andhra pradesh Page 8 of about 3,069 results (0.103 seconds)

Shaik Bandagi Saheb Vs. Shaik Nurulla Saheb

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(1)ALT380

..... the absence of such provision disables the appellate authority from sending the matter back to the officer that passed the order.the conferment of the appellate jurisdiction on a tribunal, in our opinion, necessarily implies that it has as much power to remand as it has to confirm, alter or annul and incidentally it has the power ..... in income tax officer v. mohd. kunhi, air 1969 sc 430 the supreme court held that the income-tax appellate tribunal has power to grant stay even in the absence of specific empowerment of that power in the act by declaring that the power to grant stay is incidental or ancilliary to its appellate jurisdiction. similarly in smt. savitri ..... the purpose. the language of sub-section (3) is quite clear, precise, unambiguous and it does not admit more than one meaning. the appellate authority is armed with the power to inquire as he thinks fit either personally or through the rent controller. this provision only enables the appellate authority to resort to an inquiry .....

Satyadeva Sannakaru Rythu Sangham Vs. the State of Ap Rep by Its Princ ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... the fourth respondent shall consider afresh the application made by the petitioner sangham as one submitted individually by its members, existing as on the date of coming into force of the act of 1987, and shall determine in the context of the certificates issued by the mandal revenue officer, peddapuram, and such other material as may be considered ..... favour of sri satyadeva sannakaru rythu sangham, peddapuram. significantly, the choultry did not plead that the lease had expired and seek eviction on that ground. the tribunal on facts held that no sub-lease was proved and that the evidence on record revealed that the members of both the associations were one and the same ..... thus, the petitioner sangham, being the successor of the earlier sangham, continued as the lawful lessee of the fifth respondent choultry till section 82 of the act of 1987 came into force. 18. dega babi reddy v. government of a.p.6, relied upon by sri v.t.m.prasad, learned counsel, is therefore distinguishable on facts .....

S. Vs. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1982)IILLJ7AP

..... function, or should it be treated as a private function should hindustan aeronautics limited which manufactures aeroplanes and other equipment for our armed forces but which is a company incorporated under the companies act, be characterised as a corporation performing a sovereign function, of should it be called a corporation carrying on a commercial activity ..... this order stated that, during his employment, the petitioner will be governed by the rules and regulations of the service of the company that may be in force, and which may be amended, altered or extended from time to time. it was further clarified that the acceptance of the appointment offer carries with it ..... all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the state. 'moreover, according to the principle underlying s. 16 of the general clauses act, the expression 'appointment' used in art. 16(1) will include termination of or removal from service, also'. 18. following the above principles, i am of .....

ic-3423k Lt. Col. SwaIn Shashanka Shekhar Vs. Union of India and Other ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD830; 1999(5)ALT526

..... right of interference in the matter of transfers of employees even in civil services muchlcss in a disciplined forces especially in the absence of any acts of mala fide.5. for the reasons recorded above, we find no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the learned single ..... services and the need of the nation would pass appropriate orders. we are of the considered opinion that although the instruction required an employee of a disciplined forces to post him in a plain area but he was posted in an insurgent area, still, that ground would not confer a right on the employee of the ..... disciplined forces to enforce the same through courts of law. courts would be very slow in interfering with the transfer orders passed by the authorities of the disciplined forces like army. even a little violation of the rules/regulations or instruction does not confer .....

Miss. Romini Susan Kurian Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1992AP380

..... vir chakra6. shaurya chakra7. sena, nausena, vayu sena medals8. mention in despatches. merit order of gallantry awards for bsf and crpf personnel shall be as per rules in force. (d) children of ex-servicemen, armed personnel and bsf or crpf personnel who have put in 18 years and more of qualified service. (e) children of ex-servicemen ..... no. 62 dated 10-2-1989 in exercise of the powers conferred under the provisions of the a.p. educational institutions (regulation of admission and prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1983. it provides for reservation of 4% of the seats for the children of ex-servicemen and defence personnel. it does not prescribe the order of preference. g. ..... provided a seat.6. the main contention advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that at per the regulations made under s. 192 of the army act precedence is given to vishisht seva medal and according to the notification dated 16-6-1986 issued by the secretariat of the president of india determining the order .....

Mr. X, Indian Inhabitant Vs. Chairman, State Level Police Recruitment ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD513; 2006(2)ALT82

..... the police department where persons appointed are required to satisfy the high standards of physical fitness and health prescribed. reference is also made to certain press reports indicating that the armed forces have also decided to make hiv test mandatory for candidates to enter the service.7. since the constitutional validity of order 70(3) of the revised a.p. police manual ..... , this question ought not to be examined in proceedings under article 226 of the constitution.25, in l. chandra kumar (supra 6) the supreme court held that administrative tribunals would continue to act as courts of first instance in respect of the areas of law for which they had been constituted and that it would not be open for litigants to directly .....

Pulusam Krishna Murthy Vs. T. Sujan Kumar and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD423; 2002(2)ALT77

..... belonging to scheduled tribe. respondents 1 to 5 filed an original application being oa no.2138 of 2000 under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 ('the tribunals act') before the tribunal praying to hold that g.o.ms.no.3, dated 10-1-2000 is illegal and arbitrary and to further declare the action of ..... belonging to scheduled tribe. the notification was challenged on the ground that it violates article 14 of the constitution of india, that when panchayat act is in force the governor is divested of the power under paragraph 5 of v schedule, that the reservation for scheduled tribes provided by the impugned notification could ..... whose economic interests may be prejudicially affected by the impugned provisions. tn other words, the courts examining the matter from the perspective of the constitutional mandate armed with the criterion of objectivity and overall interest for the community at larger must be satisfied that the restrictions are unreasonable. 24. in samata v. stale .....

Venkateswara Stainless Steel Wire Industries, Hyderabad Vs. Chief Cont ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1988(34)ELT49(AP)

..... under that rule as continued in force by the emergency provisions (continuance) ordinance, 1946, and in force immediately before the commencement of the act were, insofar as they were not inconsistent with the provisions of the act, to continue to remain in force and to be deemed to have been made under the act. 7. in exercise of the ..... at high temperature conditions and to have unit corrosive properties, and it is mainly required for certain furnaces, factors etc., and that the items like wiper arms blades and other automobile parts/components where processing at high temperature condition is not necessary, the import of hear resisting steel is not considered justified. this ..... by the ministry of steel and mines to the chief controller of imports and exports, wherein, as mentioned earlier, it has been stated that items like wiper arm blades another automobile parts, where processing at high temperature conditions is not necessary, the import of h.r.s. is not considered justified. 21. we .....

M. Rajaiah and ors. Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD180; 1998(2)ALT140

..... relating to interpretation of settlements and the implementation, which should be interfered and adjudicated upon by such authorities and the courts and the tribunals under the provisions of the act.12. creditably, the learned counsel on both the sides have presented certain precedents to fortify their contentions. but this court will deal ..... also. therefore, if the bank has failed to implement the sacred intention in the settlements, the failure will reach the long arms of this court under article 226 of the constitution to force implementation.31. sri s. ramachandra rao, the learned counsel for the petitioners is right in contending that the. discontinuance of ..... fresh settlements. in other words, unless the earlier settlements are altered by fresh settlements, award or valid legislation, the same would continue to be in force (para 49,59,75 and 83 of the precedent). therefore, particularly in the present case, unless the settlements themselves provided for lapsing such panels after .....

L. Chandran Vs. Venkatalakshmi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1981AP1

..... to direct today the grand-mother to hand over the baby to the petitioner.3. the first respondent, the grandmother resists this application mainly on the ground that forcing this babe-in-arms out of her six-months old company and custody, would not be in the best interests of the minor child as that would deprive the child of the ..... a judgment of a division bench of the madras high court in atchayya v. kosaraju narahari, air 1929 mad 81. in that case which arose under the guardians and wards act (act no. viii of 1890) the material facts are the following: from the time of the birth of the child it was being brought up by the maternal grand-parents. ..... parents. this request of the father having been turned down by the maternal grand-parents, the father moved the district court under section 25 of the guardians and wards act for an order directing the maternal grandparents to deliver the child to him. that application was opposed by the maternal grand-father on several grounds one of which was .....