Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 30 appeal to supreme court Page 16 of about 27,321 results (0.442 seconds)

Major S. Ravi and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD839; 2001(6)ALT202; 93(2001)DLT647

..... elaborate discussion vide its dated 7-1-1991 held that the survey of india cannot be held to be an armed force of the union and the finding to the contrary of the central administrative tribunal of hyderabad bench is not correct. it further held that even through the army engineers seconded permanently or otherwise ..... to that organisation continue to be members of the armed force so long asthey are governed by the army act, the civilian employees unless drafted for active ..... petitioners are working in survey of india and continued to be members of the armed forces.7. this controversy, in my considered view, is no more res integra having regard to the above submissions and the unchallenged finding of the central administrative tribunal, bangalore bench. therefore, i have no hesitation in holding that the writ .....

Tham Bahadur Gaurang and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1984)1GLR429

..... , which confers the powers of superintendence over all courts by the high court, expressly excludes from the operation of this article, courts, and tribunals constituted by or under any law relating to the armed forces. unless the order of detention could be shown non-est the high court, cannot interfere with the detention. the high court, in habeas ..... be referable to an entry in the relevant list. entry 2 in list i: naval. military and, air force and any other armed forces of the union, would enable parliament to enact the army act and armed with this power the act was enacted in july, 1950. it has to be enacted by the parliament subject to the requirements of part ..... central government may restrict the fundamental rights under clauses (a), (b) and (c) of article 19(1), of any person subject to the army act, every such person being clearly a member of the armed forces. the extent to which restricts may be imposed on the fundamental rights under clauses (a), (b) and (c) of article 19(1) is .....

Major Alok Shukla Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... dated 5th february, 2010, this writ petition was transferred to the armed forces tribunal for adjudication in view of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007. however, for the reason that the matter related to postings and transfer which was beyond the jurisdiction of the tribunal, the tribunal passed an order on 15th april, 2010 that it had no ..... that if the university authorities acquiesced in the infirmities which the admission form contained and allowed the candidate to appear in the examination, then by force of the university statute, the university had no power to withdraw the candidature of the candidate. applying this principle, it is urged that the ..... application will be withheld by any intermediate authority and volunteers found suitable for attachment in all respects shall be made available by the directorates of arms and services concerned.(c) judge advocate general's departmental examination.-- (i) judge advocate general's departmental examination will be held twice a year .....

Hardev Singh. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in t.a. no. 541 of 2010 (o.a. no. 29 of 2010), the appellant has filed this appeal under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007. 2. the appellant was commissioned as an officer in indian army on 17.6.1973. over a period of time, he rose to the ..... properly considered and were disposed of without assigning any reason. in the circumstances, the appellant was constrained to approach the armed forces tribunal, jaipur bench, by filing an original application. the said application was thereafter transferred to the armed forces tribunal, principal bench, new delhi. the said application was rejected by the judgment dated 26th april, 2010, which has been ..... for in the appeal be granted. 10. on the other hand, mr. p.p. tripathi, learned additional solicitor general submitted that the judgment delivered by the tribunal is just and proper. he submitted that indian army is having a pyramidal organisation and it has framed its promotion policy accordingly. till 15th december, 2004, promotions .....

R Sahadevan Pillai Vs. the Union of India Represented by the Secretary ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

..... connected t.as (s.jaganathan vs. government of india and others) etc. has discussed the matter relating to the term "any other armed forces of the union" appearing in section 2 (a) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 and examined the scope thereof to ascertain whether the cisf is also covered under the aforesaid term. para 5 of the said ..... madras for disposal.7. we are in full agreement with the aforesaid order of the tribunal that the tribunal has no jurisdiction to deal with cases of cisf which fall under the term "any other armed forces of the union" under section 2(a) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985.8. in view of the above, the oa has to be dismissed ..... . we do not see how we can ignore the expression "of any other armed forces of the union" occurring in section 2(a) and hold that members of the armed forces of the union will also come within the scope of this act."6. ultimately, the tribunal in para 8 had directed that all these applications be retransferred to the high .....

Jagraj Singh (No. 14412115k) Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... regarding jurisdiction of the high court to adjudicate upon a writ petition under articles 226/227 of the constitution of india against an order passed by the armed forces tribunal under the armed forces tribunal act, 2007. it is submitted that in view of articles 136 (2) and 227 (4).besides, article 33 of the constitution of india as well ..... inter alia observed as follows:- we are conscious of the fact that the statutory appeal against such an order is provided under section 30 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 ( for short 'the act').however, having regard to the constitution bench judgment of the supreme court in the case of l. chandra kumar etc.v.the union of india ..... as section 13 of the armed forces tribunal act 2007, this court would have no jurisdiction to entertain the petition. on merits it is submitted that the petitioner during his service was awarded five red ink .....

Major (Retd.) P.T. Lazarus Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... of the writ petition, the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 came into effect. in terms of section 34 of the said act, all cases relating to the service matters of armed forces personnel were transferred to the learned armed forces tribunal. the present case was also transferred to the learned armed forces tribunal, chandigarh bench at chandimandir ('tribunal'- for short).the writ petition ..... a counsel and was confident that his interest would be looked after by his counsel. however, the case came to be transferred to the armed forces tribunal from this court. the counsel engaged by the petitioner had been elevated to the bench of this court. the petitioner himself left his regiment ..... the petitioner was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 19.10.2010 passed by the learned tribunal. the petitioner then filed an application before the learned tribunal under rule 18 of the armed forces tribunal rules, 2008 read with order xlvii rule 1 of the code of civil procedure for recalling the .....

Gurdev Singh Vs. Union of I Ndia Through Secretary and ors

Court : Delhi

..... detailed order dated 26th september, 2011, adjudication of the petitioners objection premised on section 122 of the army act 1950 escaped notice.7. the petitioner has thereafter filed a review petition under section 14(f) of the arms forces tribunal act, 2007 on 27th july, 2011.8. this objection has been detailed in para 8 of the review application ..... 23rd may, 2011 and 26th september, 2011 are hereby set aside and quashed and the matter is remanded back to the armed forces tribunal for consideration qua the objection of the petitioner based on section 122 of the army act, 1950. (ii) we make it clear that we have not opined on the merits of the other objection of ..... grounds of challenge is that legal issue of limitation under section 122 of the army act 1950 and violation of rule 180 of the army rules, 1954 as one of the grounds though noticed in the order dated 23rd may, 2011 by armed forces tribunal was not adjudicated upon. we are, therefore, confining the present order for consideration .....

Satheesh Kumar Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary, Minis ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

..... petition was transferred to this bench under section 34 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 and is registered here as t.a.(appeal) no.104 of 2010. it may be mentioned that the proceedings ..... charge under army act section 69 for committing the civil offence under section 302 of the ranbir penal code and accordingly sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life and also directed him to be dismissed from service along with the penalty of reduction to ranks. after the establishment of this bench of the armed forces tribunal, the writ ..... not found on ingate guard duty though other guards were there. at about 22 40 hours a cracker burst like sound was heard in the vicinity by several armed forces personnel including officers. after a gap of 20 - 25 seconds, four rounds of cracker burst like sound was also heard. the people started moving here and .....

J. Nanda Kumar Vs. the Union of India Represented by the Secretary and ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

..... of law and facts are involved, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order. 2. in the instant original applications filed under section 14 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, the applicants have claimed disability pension. 3. the relevant facts of each case are being narrated separately as follows: (i) oa no.130 of 2010: ..... nexus between the act, omission or commission resulting in an injury to the person and the normal expected standard ..... considered the relevancy of the finding on the nexus between the act resulting in the injury/disease and the normal expected standard of duties and way of life expected from a member of the armed forces and held as follows: ...the member of the armed forces who is claiming disability pension must be able to show a normal .....