Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 30 appeal to supreme court Court: punjab and haryana Page 8 of about 391 results (0.156 seconds)

Madan Tarlok Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Home Secy ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1970P& H471

..... himachal pradesh or chandigarh, construe the law in such manner, without affecting the substance, as may be necessary or proper in regard to the matter before the court, tribunal or authority. (2) any reference to the high court of punjab in any law shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be construed, on and from the appointed ..... (1) notwithstanding that no provision or insufficient provision has been made under section 89 for the adaptation of a law made before the appointed day, any court tribunal or authority, required or empowered to enforce such law may, for the purpose of facilitating its application in relation to the state of punjab or haryana, or to ..... in reference to the territorial extent of the laws that the provisions 'of part second of the puniab reorganisation act shall not be deemed to have effected any change in the territories to which any law in force immediately before the appointed day extends or applies.29. the last argument on behalf of the respondents may also .....

S. Iqbal Singh Vs. S. Gurdas Singh Badal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1973P& H163

..... ptition, the returning officer is a proper party though s. 82 does not make him a necessary party. section 90 (present section 87) of the act enables the tribunal to implead the returning officer as a party under the provisions of the civil procedure code which are expressly made applicable, to the trial of election petitions subject to ..... officer was a party to that election petition and the supreme court did not direct his name being struck off. this submission has, in my opinion, no force. no objection was raised to the returning officer being a party to that petition either by him or by any other respondent. neither the high court, nor ..... written statement to the election petition so that everyone knows what his answers to the allegations in the petition are, the cross-examining party is able to get armed with documentary and other evidence which may be necessary to confront the returning officer. without expressly subscribing to the view expressed by the madhya pradesh high court, .....

Premier Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2005P& H280; (2005)141PLR443

..... petitioners to restore the land or building to its original state or to bring it in conformity with the provisions of the scheduled roads act and the rules framed there under. the petitioners were infonned that as the tribunal had been constituted, they had a right to file an appeal against the aforementioned order.4. the petitioners applied for copies of the ..... commenced operation in 1985. the petitioners received a notice dated 3.6.2002 from the tribunal, constituted under the punjab scheduled roads and controlled area (restriction of unregulated development) act, 1963 (for short herein after referred to as 'the scheduled roads act) requiring them to appear before the tribunal on 18.7.2002. the aforementioned notice referred to show cause notices dated 16.1 .....

Karam Singh Vs. the Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)116PLR692

..... recount. we do not find any substance in this submission. we have perused the certified copy of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner before the election tribunal. counsel had agreed to a recount and on the basis of the consent given by the counsel for the petitioner the recount was ordered. counsel appearing for the petitioner ..... was recorded and read over and after accepting the same, it was signed by the counsel. in view of the statements made by the counsel for the parties, election tribunal ordered a recount of the votes. in recount, it was found that respondent no. 4 had polled more votes than the petitioner, as a consequence thereof election of the ..... was held by their lordships that [emphasis (in italics) supplied]. this agreement, we may add, does not violate any of the provisions of the representation of the people act, 1951, including section 97 thereof'5. for the reasons stated above, we find no force in this petition and dismiss the same with no order as to costs. .....

Present: Mr. Nearaj Khanna Advocate as Amicus Curiae with Vs. National ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... in the case of sarla verma versus delhi transport corporation, 2009 acj 129.shall be '18'. the total dependancy is, accordingly, determined as `3,78,000/-. the tribunal had awarded an amount of `2,000/- for transportation of the dead body and `5,000/- towards cremation expenses. the accident had taken place within the jurisdiction of gharonda ..... has f.a.o.no.4151 of 2009 -3- been made for enhancement of the compensation amount. counsel for respondent no.3-insurance company has argued that the tribunal rightly awarded the compensation amount to the appellants by taking into consideration the ages of the appellants. he further submitted that the judgment in the case of amrit ..... no.3. **** t.p.s.mann, j. the claimants have filed the present appeal under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 for challenging the award passed by the motor accidents claims tribunal, faridabad on 18.10.2007 to the extent of granting inadequate compensation to them on account of death of their son som dutt in .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Punjab Government and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1990ACJ415

..... surinder singh, respondent no. 4.2. the new india assurance co. ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the appellant') has challenged the award of the motor accidents claims tribunal only to the extent to which it has been held liable to pay the amount of compensation. in cross-objection, respondents nos. 3 and 4 pleaded that it was a ..... . the second submission of learned counsel was that the liability of the insurance company was to the extent of rs. 15,000 only. this argument has also no force. the total liability of the insurance company is rs. 1,50,000. admittedly, one passenger received injuries which proved fatal. the insurance company is liable to the ..... page 242) :'if the conductor of the bus allowed bagga singh, deceased, to travel on the roof of the bus, it was against the statutory provisions of the act. apart from that, clause (2) of the insurance agreement under the caption 'endorsement no. imt 16', clearly provides that the insured shall take reasonable precautions to prevent .....

integrated Informatics Private Limited Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2005]142STC182(P& H)

..... contest the notice on the ground that it was laconic or was ultra vires to section 40(1) of the 1973 act. in the appeal filed before the tribunal, the petitioner did not challenge order dated december 23, 1998 (annexure p5) on the ground that the notice issued ..... the case may be, and for this purpose sub-clause (ii) and sub-clause (iv) shall be deemed to have come into force with effect from the 18th day of april, 1984.note 3 : a sale falling under sub-clause (ii) shall be deemed to have ..... does not include a mortgage, hypothecation, charge or pledge.note 1 : sub-clauses (i) and (v) shall be deemed to have come into force on the second day of february, 1983.note 2 : sub-clauses (ii) and (iv) so far as it relates to the goods, namely, ..... by the tent dealers as also other allied dealers for decoration and lightning purposes, electricity meters and water meters, shall come into force with effect from the 1st day of april, 1987 :provided that a dealer, who has charged tax or has made use of authority .....

Cit Vs. Suresh Kumar (Legal Heir of Siri Ram)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(P& H)507; [2005]276ITR253(P& H)

..... passed by him in the case of vidya sagar and held that the assessing officer did not have the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under section 147 of the act. the tribunal relied on the judgment of the supreme court in indian and eastern newspaper society v. cit : [1979]119itr996(sc) , the judgments of the calcutta high court ..... cit v. smt. usha mathur , a division bench of this court, while dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue under section 260a of the act, approved the view taken by the tribunal that the valuation report could not be made the basis for reopening the assessment which had already been finalised.12. we may now revert to the case ..... to protect against arbitrary reopening of assessments by the revenue.'15. in our opinion, the view taken by the tribunal that the assessing officer did not have the jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under section 147 of the act is correct and the question referred by it in pursuance of the direction given by this court deserves to be .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ms. Monica Oswal,

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(P& H)56; [2004]267ITR308(P& H)

..... . moreover, none of the other cases cited by counsel has any relevance to decide whether a substantial question of law within the framework of section 260a of the act arises out of the appellate tribunal's decision.70. mr. r. p. sawhney, counsel for the revenue, also laid some stress on the case of mcdowell and co. ltd. v. cto : [1985] ..... to further limit the jurisdiction of the high court. prior to the amendment the interference could have been where an order was contrary to law or some usage having the force of law. but now it can only be if any substantial question of law arises. the words 'substantial question of law' brought in have significance and are not superfluous. ..... which reads as under :'100. second appeal--(1) save as otherwise expressly provided in the body of this code or by any other law for the time being in force, an appeal shall lie to the high court from every decree passed in appeal by any court subordinate to the high court, if the high court is satisfied that the .....

Present : Mr. Binderjit Singh Advocate Vs. Punjab Wakf Board Bathinda

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... passed a decree against the defendant, although it had no jurisdiction. in this regard, learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to section 7(5) of the act as per which the tribunal shall not have any jurisdiction to determine any matter which is the subject matter of any suit or proceeding instituted or commenced in a civil court before the ..... 2002 the suit was transferred to the tribunal primarily on the ground that the defendant had challenged the ownership of the ..... commencement of the act. it is true that initially the suit was filed by the board in the civil court on 4.8.2000. however, in the year .....