Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 30 appeal to supreme court Court: punjab and haryana Page 10 of about 391 results (0.123 seconds)

Dec 22 1972 (HC)

Satya NaraIn Vs. Dhaja Ram and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1973P& H431

..... it was detected does not in any way confer any right on the petitioner to improve his position. that case arose under the unamended act, and it was held that the power of the election tribunal to dismiss an election petition is not in any way affected by the fact that it was not dismissed by the election commission at the ..... petitioner could not be permitted to use two alternative phrases of 'hiring' and 'procuring', but should be pinned down to one of the two expressions. i do not find much force in this submission. a vehicle which is hired is also procured by hiring. no exception can, therefore, be taken to the use of the expressions 'hired' and 'procured' in ..... can be construed to amount to rectification of the alleged defect, the same is without jurisdiction and has no force in the eye of law, and cannot absolve the petitioner from the liability incurred by him under section 86(1) of the act.14. mr. bakhtawar singh also referred to the judgment of the supreme court in amin lal v. hunna .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 1996 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Export India Corporation (P.) Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)133CTR(P& H)224; [1996]219ITR461(P& H)

..... pending before the competent authority at the initial stage only and not to the proceedings which were pending at the appeal stage before the tribunal/high court.28. there is not much force in this contention. in the circular, no words of limitation prescribing its applicability to the proceedings at the initial stage are there. in ..... , the commissioner recorded his approval on march 30, 1979, and thereafter the competent authority passed its order under section 269f(6) of the act on march 31, 1979. the tribunal concluded that the competent authority should have sent the draft order of acquisition along with the proposal and since, it was not sent, the ..... shall be furnished to the appropriate authority constituted by the central government under the new chapter, within such time as may be prescribed. section 269ud of the act provides that the appropriate authority after the receipt of the statement in respect of any immovable property, may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, make orders .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2012 (HC)

Present: Mr. Ashit Malik Advocate Vs. Shri Soran Dass and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . less deduction of tax, his take home salary was 12,750 krones. the tribunal, while assessing compensation, provided for ` 70,000/- towards medicines fao no.39 of 2009 (o&m) -2- and special diet and ` 2,50,000/- towards non ..... ?. no.---- k.kannan, j.(oral) 1. the appeal is for enhancement of compensation determined for a male aged 25 years.who suffered a privation of the right arm by amputation. the assessment of disability was 82%. he was technically trained as a catering manager and was working in foreign country, drawing a salary of 15,000 krones ..... lost his job. 3. the cases of amputation where an assessment of disability is made, have reasonably good guidance through the provisions of the workmen's compensation act itself that sets out in schedule-i corresponding the loss of percentage of earning capacity. the disability is normally understood as a functional disability of a particular organ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Naveen Daryal Advocate Vs. Presiding Officer Industrial T ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cwp no.12923 of 2014 date of decision: 08.07.2014 kanwar bhan ...petitioner(s) versus presiding officer, industrial tribunal-cum-labour court-ii, chandigarh and another ...respondent(s) coram: hon'ble mr.justice g.s.sandhawalia present: mr.naveen daryal, advocate, for the petitioner. g.s. ..... the ahar branch and it was an intermittent appointment. 240 days had not been completed and, therefore, there was no violation of the mandatory provisions of the act. the fact that juniors had been appointed was also specifically denied in the written statement. the labour court had found that since 240 days were not complete, ..... the question of violation of section 25-f of the act would not come into play. counsel for the petitioner has vehemently submitted that since the workman had worked for 92 days, therefore, the provisions of the punjab .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 1978 (HC)

Avon Scales Company Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1978]42STC363(P& H)

..... of appeals and revisions provided by the statute against the original order of assessment. there are even further remedies provided by the culminating reference from the sales tax tribunal to this court. in this context, the petitioners are disentitled to any relief at the hands of the writ court and are relegated to their ordinary statutory ..... may on his own motion call for the record of any case pending before, or disposed of by, any assessing authority or appellate authority, other than the tribunal, for the purposes of satisfying himself as to the legality or propriety of any proceedings or of any order made therein and may pass such order in relation ..... also learned counsel for the petitioners is on equally tenuous ground. as is evident, the haryana general sales tax act, 1973, was enacted by the legislature of the state of haryana in 1973 and came into force on 5th may, 1973. it is well-settled that subject to constitutional restrictions the power to legislate includes the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 22 1979 (HC)

Jiwan Dass Roshan Lal Vs. Karnail Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1980P& H167

..... had been allowed to board the same by its driver. karnail singh apparently at the behest of tara sin (a w. 6) on this established factual foundation, the forceful argument raised on behalf of the appellant-owners of the truck is that no tortious liability can possibly be foisted on them. it has been plausibly argued that there is ..... that in unauthorisedly carrying pritam sin deceased in the good truck its driver karnail singh was plainly infracting r. 4.60 and therefore committing an offence punishable under the act. in such a situation there can obviously be little question of any authorisation by the owner of the truck to carry pritam singh in particular or any passenger in ..... not entitled to any compensation and were not competent to file the petition and these issues were decided against them.5. aggrieved by the judgment of the tribunal, the petitioner-respondents appealed and the learned single judge in an elaborate judgment, after appraising the evidence, affirmed the findings of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2005 (HC)

Baljinder Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2006(3)SLJ392(P& H)

..... martial proceedings. at any rate it cannot be higher than the jurisdiction of the high court exercised under article 227 against an order of an inferior tribunal....19. no other point was urged by learned counsel for the parties.for the reasons aforementioned, i do not find any merit in this petition which ..... -7) whereby apart from sentencing the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months in civil jail, he was also dismissed from the service of border security force. as a consequential relief, the petitioner seeks his reinstatement in service along with all the monetary benefits.2. the petitioner was enrolled as a constable (general ..... which has already been made.7. aggrieved at the aforesaid decision of the summary security force court, the petitioner preferred a statutory petition under section 117 of the border security force act, 1968 along with an application under section 130 of the act for suspension of the sentence imposed upon him. his appeal, however, was turned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1966 (HC)

Sardool Singh Vs. Hari Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1968P& H204

..... x x so far as the first point is concerned, it has to be seen whether an award,without the intervention of the court, madesubsequent to the coming into force of theindian arbitration act, 1940 deciding questions of title to immovable property worthone hundred rupees and upwards is com-pulsorlly registrable. we have, therefore,to consider the provisions of section 17 of ..... , the award became enforceable as a decree as soon as it was filed. but under the present act all proceedings with regard to the arbitration agreement or the award have to be taken as provided by the act and before the tribunal indicated by the act. section 32 specifically provides that no suit shall he on any around what so every for a decision .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr.Arun Kathpalia Advocate and Vs. Regional Provident Fund Co ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... no.1807 of 2003 on 4.2.2003 between the parties wherein the following observations have been made:- confronted with the findings recorded by the rpfc and appellate tribunal, as reproduced above, mr.patwalia then contends that the official respondents should apply a list of 228 employees to the petitioner before the impugned orders are implemented, ..... .of recovery proceedings. he would point out that there is certain increase in numbers of employees which have crept in after the order under section 7a of the act was passed. further submits that when the petitioner came into possession of the list of 228 employees in january, 2004, the petitioner found that there were 143 ..... to the order of this court dated 29.4.2004 passed in recovery proceedings consequent upon the order dated 3.5.2001 passed under section 7a of the act. after the order was passed, the respondent-organization issued a letter dated 19.2.2009 calling upon the petitioner to appear before the assessing authority-cum-recovery .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2007 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kuldip Industrial Corporation

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2007)209CTR(P& H)400

..... 1986 on 26.9.1988 cit patiala v. kuldip industrial corporation chandigarh had issued directions under section 256(2) of the income tax act, 1961 (for brevity 'the act') to the income tax appellate tribunal (for short 'the tribunal') revenue to refer the following questions of law for the opinion of this court:i) whether on the facts and in the ..... circumstances of the case, the appellate tribunal was right in holding that the cit (appeals) could under section 250(4) of the it act,1961 admit evidence of the death of smt. darshna devi without giving any opportunity to the income tax officer to rebut ..... the same are required under rule 46a of the income tax rules, 1962;ii) whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appellate tribunal was right in holding that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //