Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 30 appeal to supreme court Court: punjab and haryana Page 23 of about 391 results (0.329 seconds)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Haryana Warehousing Corporation

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(P& H)124; [2009]314ITR215(P& H); [2009]182TAXMAN107(Punj& Har)

..... have been penalised for filing a false or inaccurate return, so as to impose upon it any penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the act. 18. the aforesaid findings recorded by the income tax appellate tribunal are subject matter of challenge at the hands of the revenue through the instant appeal. when the instant appeal came up for hearing for the ..... the act, is being extracted hereunder:10. incomes not included in total income-in computing the total income of a previous year of any person, any income falling within any of the following clauses shall not be included(1) to (28) xx xx (29) in the case of an authority constituted under any law for the time being in force for the .....

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)19VST529(P& H)

..... do-------------------------------------------------------------------------------2000-01 43,53,12,240 16,26,25,807 remaining (amount has been stayedand matter on merits is pendingbefore the haryana tax tribunal.------------------------------------------------------------------------------14. for the current year, initially demand of rs. 170,80,55,315 was raised which on remand by the appellate authority in ..... submitted to the assessing authority. in addition to this, various other transactions of stock transfer had been shown to other depots including air force stations. for the purpose of carrying highly inflammable/explosive material, the same is required to be carried in specially designed containers which are ..... stay application filed by the petitioner-company vide order dated february 8, 2008 finding therein that in terms of section 33(8) of the act, the appellate authority has not been vested with any power to deal with the stay application. accordingly, the application was found to be .....

M/S. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. and Others Vs. Haryana S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures. 19. sequelly, the parliament has passed the acts of 1974, 1981 and 1986. the act of 1986 was brought into force throughout the india w.e.f. 19.11.1986. section 3 of this act confers power on the central government to take all such measures as it deems necessary or expedient for ..... apparent that section 2(n) of cr.pc defines the word offence to mean that any act or omission made punishable by any law for the time being in force. the offence/acts done also extend to illegal omissions (under section 32 ipc). the act of omission and offence have been defined under sections 33 and 40 of ipc. section 35 of ..... ipc postulates that whenever an act, which is criminal only by reason of its being done with .....

Raghbir Singh and ors. Vs. Sikri Multiplex Cinema P. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas497(P& H); [2009]93SCL188(Punj& Har)

..... the family arrangement dated september 16, 2002, following things had taken place:(i) the father had secured rs. 86,40,000 pursuant to an award of arbitration tribunal that was made a rule of the court by decision of the hon'ble supreme court when the first petitioner's brother gave the amount as consideration for relinquishment ..... high court that the family settlement and the resignation letter should be kept in abeyance for a period of six months was taken as a shot in the arm of the plaintiffs to file a petition again complaining of oppression and mismanagement. the order of the high court was conceived by the petitioners as restoring their ..... had taken a normal business decision and exercised its powers, it would not be proper to interfere with the equitable discretion in an appeal under section 10f of the act. in sangramsinh p. gaekwad v. shantadevi p. gaekwad : air2005sc809 , the hon'ble supreme court dealt with several aspects relating to what would merit consideration in petitions .....

Steel Authority of India Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2007)10VST49(P& H)

..... s.t.c. no. 5 of 1996.2. this is a petition under section 42 of the haryana general sales tax act, 1973 (for short, 'the state act'), seeking a direction to the sales tax tribunal, haryana (for short, 'the tribunal') for referring following questions of law for opinion of this court arising out of its order passed in s.t.a. no ..... appeal vide order dated february 27, 1996, annexure p6. the assessee, thereafter, filed a petition for reference of questions of law to this court, which was dismissed by the tribunal vide annexure p7. case of the assessee is that sales in question have to be treated as intra-state sales having regard to the fact that the assessee made delivery ..... none of the bills in dispute pertains to a party of haryana state. the contention of the appellant that the delivery of the goods was given at faridabad has no force as he has not adduced any evidence in support of this claim which may suggest that the delivery of the goods was given at faridabad. rather the case is strongly .....

Ashwani Kumar and ors. Vs. Winsome Textiles Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2009]147CompCas155(P& H); (2008)152PLR470

..... i.r. 2000 supreme court 1535 wherein the hon'ble supreme court made following observations regarding the exclusive jurisdiction of the tribunal constituted under the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act for adjudication of liability of debtor:25. thus, the adjudication of liability and the recovery of the amount by execution ..... court can go into the said questions relating to the liability and the recovery except as provided in the act....13. it is further argued that it is also within the exclusive domain of the tribunal to adjudicate upon the counter claim and set off. reliance is placed upon the case of mundit entertainment industries ..... of the certificate are respectively within the exclusive jurisdiction of the tribunal and the recovery officer and no other court or authority .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Liberty Group Marketing Division

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(P& H)194; [2009]315ITR125(P& H)

..... permanent nature. it has a short life. the materials used in the glow sign boards decay with the effect of weather. therefore, it requires frequent replacement. the tribunal has also recorded a finding that the assessee has to incur expenditure on glow sign boards regularly in almost each year. this fact itself shows that the advantage ..... year. therefore, the expenditure incurred on the glow sign boards is not for the enduring advantage of the business. learned counsel referred to the finding of the tribunal, where it has been held that the expenditure incurred by the assessee on glow sign boards is being incurred regularly in almost each year. this finding in itself ..... rightly ordered to be deducted on account of advertisement expenditure in view of sub-section (3) of section 37 of the act, which was in force at that time. sub-section (3) which has been omitted by finance act, 1997, w.e.f. 1st april, 1998, dealt with three types of expenditure, one on advertisement, second on maintenance .....

Dasu Ram Nautan Dass Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)19VST34(P& H)

..... and by order dated january 29, 2007, the vat tribunal dismissed the second appeal.3. the appellant is a dealer, registered under the punjab vat act, and was also a registered dealer under the punjab general sales tax act, 1948 (for short, 'the pgst act'). on the coming into force of the punjab vat act, all dealers like the appellant, who had any stock ..... ajay tewari, j.1. the present appeal has been filed on the following question of law:2. whether order of learned tribunal upholding the levy of penalty under section 56 of the punjab vat act, 2005 is sustainable in the eyes of law, when the assessee has not actually availed of the said benefit, no demand is due from assessee ..... of goods on which tax had already been paid under section 5(1) or 5(3) of the pgst act, were entitled to claim input-tax credit on .....

Partap Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2007)9VST629(P& H)

..... (for short, 'the act') on the ground that deduction under rule 29(xii) of the rules had been allowed wrongly. accordingly, the same was disallowed vide order dated june 24, 1991. revision of the assessee before the tribunal against the order passed by the revisional authority was dismissed vide order dated february 28, 1992 with the following observations: ..... taxable goods for sale. the other plea of the counsel for the applicant is that it has been used as chemical and not as an energy has also no force. neither it is borne by record nor it can be said as per the process of manufacturing involved.' (sic)4. the relevant provisions of rule 29(xii) ..... is part of such consumable stores which would be necessarily required in the activity of marketing the goods which is essentially connected with the larger activity of manufacture. the tribunal was, therefore, not justified in holding that kathi purchased and used by the assessee for the packing of the goods for sale was not purchased and used as .....

Lachman Dass Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2007)146PLR391

..... never end.(iv) such a practice would add to the mounting arrears of cases and would completely frustrate the object of expeditious disposal of the disputes by the courts, judicial tribunals and quasi judicial authorities.8. in the said case, it was found that neither tahil ram's case (supra) or kirpal kaur's case (supra) lays down a guiding ..... rule 4(2) of the code of civil procedure which are to the effect that the appointment of an advocate filed in the court shall be deemed to be in force until determined with the leave of the court by a writing signed by the client or the pleader, as the case may be, and filed in court. necessarily, once ..... (supra).10. in fact, in section ii, chapter ii of part ii of the rules framed by the bar council of india under section 49(1)(c) of the advocates act, 1961, it is contemplated that an advocate shall not ordinarily withdraw from engagements once accepted, without sufficient cause and unless reasonable and sufficient notice is given to the client. the .....