Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 30 appeal to supreme court Court: punjab and haryana Page 18 of about 391 results (0.141 seconds)

Gura Singh Vs. Ajaib Singh Bhatti

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... held at village salabatpura, district bhatinda. this constitutes corrupt practice as defined in section 123 (2), (3) 3-a) of the r.p. act.2. on 8.2.2007, news item appeared in punjabi tribune stating that premis of sacha sauda have taken procession in favour of congress (i) specially in mandi basti etc. of nathana constituency. this constitutes corrupt ..... 2007 on its receipt from gurjit singh, bucho mandi-based correspondent of the newspaper.22. pw-6 som nath bajaj, an official posted in hrd department of the punjabi tribune, proved news items ex. pw6/1 and ex. pw6/2 and testified that these news items had been published on the basis of information supplied by bhagwan dass garg, ..... they want and it cannot be said to be sufficient to influence the mind of the followers.114. i have not been able to persuade myself to find any force in the plea on behalf of the petitioner. the following observations shall support this view of mine.115. like any other citizen, a religious or sect leader has .....

M/s. Bellsonica Auto Component India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... pack, at one go. besides, if the delinquent employee appears and then disappears without justification, ex parte proceedings against him cannot be challenged. the authority or tribunal cannot sit in judgment as an appellate authority over the decision of the employer. this is the binding view of precedents and the principle of stare decisis. the ..... the consideration is only prima facie on the facts presented. jurisdiction under section 33(2)(b) of the act cannot be equated with that of section 10 of the act. the conciliation officer cannot be regarded as a tribunal within the meaning of article 136 of the constitution of india. the conciliation officer has not to decide ..... registered notices advising the date/s of hearing in the inquiry proceedings. when respondent no.5 did not join, the management explains that the inquiry officer per force was left with no other option except to conduct ex parte inquiry against the workman and the charges imputed have been proven by ex parte evidence. the .....

Eros City Developers Private Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)150PLR492

..... they had built their factory and with the permission of the respondents, petitioners invested huge money on buildings and machinery. state government cannot repudiate those acts to the detriment of the petitioners. land of the petitioners had been released from the acquisition earlier and they were allowed change of the user of ..... consistent past practice.' it appears to be well settled that the doctrine of legitimate expectation imposes in a sense a duty on a public authority to act fairly by taking into consideration all relevant factors. any unreasonableness is considered as unfairness and violation of the principles of natural justice. therefore, if there ..... cited by the petitioner-company.arguments19. mr. harish malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the mandatory provisions of section 5a of the act has not been complied with. according to learned counsel before depriving a person of his immovable property compulsorily an obligation has been cast on the respondents .....

Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Keshav Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)151PLR481

..... view, the ratio of law laid down in these cases would not be attracted to the facts of the present case. jalour singh s case (supra) was a case where tribunal had awarded a sum of rs. 1,44,000/- as a compensation against rs. five lacs claimed by the claimant. in an appeal filed before the high court, the case ..... sharma (supra). the present case is the one which has been decided by permanent lok adalat (public utility services), gurgaon under the provisions of section 22(c)(8) of the act, 1987. this is not a case which was referred to lok adalat for settlement or conciliation. the matter went to permanent lok adalat at the pre-litigation stage and the ..... the jurisdiction of the same forum as has been done before this court. in fact, the challenge to the validity of section 22(c)(8) of the legal services authorities act, 1987, whereby chapter iv-a has been inserted, was challenged before the hon'ble supreme court, but the constitutional validity thereof was upheld vide an order 28.10.2002 in .....

Ravinder Kumar Rawal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)156PLR641

..... set aside by the learned election tribunal, has filed the present writ petition with twofold prayers ; i) to declare bye-laws 36 of the haryana municipal business bye-laws 1981 (for brevity '1981 bye-laws') as ultra vires to the provisions of the haryana municipal act, 1973 (for brevity '1973 act') and further to quash the ..... choice. accordingly, the election of the present petitioner as president of m.c. panchkula were declared illegal, null and void and the same was set aside. learned tribunal further ordered that respondent nos. 2 & 3 i.e deputy commissioner, panchkula and sdo (civil), panchkula respectively shall be at liberty to conduct fresh elections.4. ..... the same was disposed of without notice to even the official respondents (who have also filed writ petition before this court challenging orders of the learned election tribunal and the district judge) and on the very first date of hearing itself without the appeal being numbered.17. per contra, learned counsel for respondent no. .....

Baljit Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)152PLR193

..... municipalities and not to the office bearers, whereas rule 50 of the panchayat election rules specifically provides that election petition under section 76 of the election commission act shall be presented to the election tribunal. further, in para 6 of the said judgment, it has been noticed that counsel for the petitioner in that case, to strengthen his argument that there is ..... part and parcel of the election of the gram panchayat. thereafter, it cannot be said that the provisions of the election commission act are not applicable to the election of the sarpanch. hence, we do not find any force in the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that since the election of sarpanch is indirectly conducted from amongst the members of .....

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited Vs. Presiding Officer and Anothe ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... good and sufficient reason. 7. this court finds no error apparent on the face of the record warranting interference in the writ jurisdiction while reviewing awards of tribunals as there is neither perversity nor irrationality nor is there found any gross misreading of evidence adduced by the parties on record and findings arrived therefrom. 8. consequently ..... length on the merits of the case, this court has turned around to the view that interference with the impugned award passed by the presiding officer, industrial tribunal, gurdaspur in reference no. 69 of 2008 is not called for. of the several reasons why this court would not like to interfere with the award is ..... service in the preceding 12 calendar months from the date of termination and absence of meeting prerequisites in the provisions of section 25-f of the industrial disputes act, 1947 when neither notice nor wages in lieu of notice and retrenchment compensation were paid to the workman on the fateful day i.e. on october 30, .....

Bansal India (Pvt.) Limited Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)2PLR656

..... the petitioner for issuance of permission for change of land use has been declined. the petitioner has also prayed that notifications under sections 4 and 6 of the land acquisition act, 1894, leading to passing of award on 22.7.2003, passed by the land acquisition collector, gurgaon, be also quashed.2. the case of the petitioner in ..... by the director, town and country planning-respondent no. 3 and it was advised to apply for change of land use in accordance with the provisions of the 1963 act and the rules framed thereunder. the petitioner accordingly applied for grant of permission for change of land use on 6.4.1994 and submitted 'no objection certificate' from ..... the controlled area and change of land use is required as per provision of section 7 of the punjab scheduled roads and controlled area restriction of unregulated development act, 1963 (hereinafter referred as act no. 41 of 1963) the non-publication of the plan can not be a excuse to grant change of land use. noc was granted by the .....

Kesar Singh Vs. State Transport Commissioner and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)151PLR714

..... against the aforesaid order, the pepsu road transport corporation, patiala (respondent no. 3 herein) filed a revision petition under section 90 of the motor vehicles act (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') before the appellate tribunal. the appellate tribunal vide order dated 29.1.2007 allowed the revision petition and set aside the order of grant of regular extension while observing as under:13 ..... ) of the modified transport scheme dated 21.10.1997. the supreme court in mysore state road transport corporation v. mysore state transport appellate tribunal : [1975]1scr615 , observed that if any transport scheme published, approved and notified under the act, prohibits private transport operators to operate on the notified area or route or any portion thereof, the regional transport authority can not either .....

Tehsildar (Sales), Gurgaon and Another Vs. Roshan Lal and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2012AIR(PandH)42

..... act has not come into force. 13. now coming to the facts of the present case, it is an admitted fact ..... instituted or commenced in a civil court under sub-section (1) of section 6, before the commencement of this act, i.e., if any suit has been instituted in any civil court prior to coming into force of the wakf act, 1995, then the tribunal will have no jurisdiction to decide such matter and it will be continued and concluded as if ..... on 7.11.1983, and the wakf act, 1995 came into force from 1.1.1996. that under the provisions of the said act, it is specifically provide that any proceedings which are pending before the civil court or which are the subject matter of any appeal before the commencement of this act, the tribunal shall not have jurisdiction to determine the subject .....