Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 30 appeal to supreme court Court: kerala Page 6 of about 306 results (0.171 seconds)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Annamma Babu and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1990ACJ909

..... . there is a rider added to the above direction, namely, that execution for realisation of the compensation shall be taken against the appellant in the first instance. the tribunal has also apportioned the compensation amount among the various claimants. it is this award that is under challenge in the appeal.5. the point urged by the learned counsel ..... the deceased, who was the owner of the vehicle, could not claim the benefits of the policy because it was issued to cover only third party risks.4. the tribunal after evaluating the evidence produced by the parties held that the claimants were entitled to get an amount of rs. 2,54,000/- as compensation with interest at 6 ..... third party risk and forbids use of a motor vehicle at a public place unless there is in force in relation to the use of the vehicle a policy of insurance complying with the requirements of chapter viii of the motor vehicles act. in order to say that an insurance policy is one issued under chapter viii, the same shall .....

State Bank of Travancore and ors. Vs. C.K. Leela

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1999)IILLJ522Ker

..... result of quasi-judicial adjudicatory process. even otherwise, according to the learned senior standing counsel, orders of authorities and the tribunal cannot be equated to precedent. further, one order cannot be judged with reference to earlier or later order. it will ..... wrong, but each order has to be judged according to its own facts and circumstances and the provision of law in force at that time. it is the specific case of the respondents that the earlier order is bad. for the above ..... senior standing counsel for the customs and contended that reliance placed by the appellant upon the earlier order by which fire arms brought by him were released, can be of no help to the appellant since the earlier orders of release were ..... learned judge should have found that the respondent cannot claim as right the benefit arising out of an irregular or illegal act. learned counsel for the respondent submitted that since there is discrimination in the matter of appointment in appointing one alikutty, .....

Ayisha Beevi Subaida Beevi Vs. Ibrahim Kunju Shamsudeen and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ163

..... further question of law as to the propriety of the decision regarding the kudikidappu entered into by the appellate court without referring the claim to the land tribunal is also raised. the appellant raises yet another question, as to whether the court below was justified in reducing the value of improvements on the ground that ..... consideration and the answer is in the negative.7. section 125(3) of the kerala land reforms act enjoins on a civil court whenever a dispute as to the tenancy arises to refer that matter to the land tribunal. but every case, where the defendant raises the case of tenancy or kudikidappu, need not be referred ..... right of redemption, the suit was decreed. the value of improvements was also computed applying the provisions contained in section 16 in the compensation for tenants improvements act, finding that the property was over cultivated. this appellate decree is under challenge mainly raising the question of law centered around whether the second suit was barred .....

M/S. Tropical Farms, Maramon, Kozenchery, Represented by Its Managing ...

Court : Kerala

..... or under sub-section (4) of section 59 of the kerala general sales tax act 1963 (15 of 1963) had been paid and which are held as opening stock on the date of coming into force of the act." (emphasis supplied) 5. the tribunal held against the petitioners by relying on the decision of the supreme court in indian ..... since the petitioners are first taxable sellers of full grown birds they are not entitled to the benefit of section 6(5) of the act. it is against these orders of the tribunal, the petitioners have approached this court with these revision petitions. 4. in order to consider the controversy we have to refer to the relevant ..... provisions of the act, which are extracted hereunder:- "6(5) notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (1), but subject to sub-section (2), any registered dealer not .....

S.Hariharan. Vs. Shri.O.J.Shibu.

Court : Kerala

..... dispute is pending before the election tribunal. we do not intend to express any opinion in this regard. we find that there is no merit in the contempt petition and no further steps are to be ..... by this court, to grant police protection, has been complied with in toto and there was no untoward incident in connection with the election. the deployment of the police force with sufficient number of police personnel has been explained in paragraph 4, while the events and developments have been explained in paragraphs 5 and 6 as well, which are as ..... to the polling. police maintained law and order in and around the polling station." 8. on going through the materials on record we find that, there is no contumacious act on the part of the respondent and no further proceedings are to be pursued by this court. it is also brought to the notice of this court that, the election .....

V. Ramachandran and Another Vs. Narendra Sinh and Others

Court : Kerala

..... on the spot of accident. claiming a total compensation of 50,00,000/- under different heads, the appellants filed claim petition before the tribunal, under section 166 of the act. 2. before the tribunal, respondents 1 and 2, namely, the owner and driver of the lorry remained ex parte. the 3rd respondent insurer filed a written statement ..... respondents through paper publication they have not chosen to enter appearance. 6. the sole issue that arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the tribunal was justified in dismissing the claim petition as not maintainable, concluding that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the deceased himself ..... regulations for the driving of motor vehicles. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 118 of the act, the government made the rules of the road regulations, 1989, for the driving of motor vehicles, which came into force on 1.7.1989. regulation 15 deals with parking of the vehicle. regulation 15(1) provides that .....

Murukankutty Vs. Amarnath Shetty

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT971

..... :(1) notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, or in any judgment, decree, or order of any court or tribunal in any custom, contract or other documents, with effect from the date of commencement of this act, the ownership and possession of all ecologically fragile lands held by any person ..... for restoration. that restoration was, as is discernible from the reported decision, a developed plantation. taking into account that fact and the wording in the ordinance then in force, the division bench said that such a plantation could not have vested. this was so because of sub-section (2) to section (3) of the ordinance. ..... cannot, at present, be restored. necessarily, there arises no question of any contumacious conduct on the part of the respondent. the vesting in terms of the said act comes, notwithstanding any judgment. the non-obstante clause affects annexure a judgment as well. the respondent did not have any liability in terms of annexure a judgment, .....

Rafeeque Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... same day delivered the following:- w.a.no.1230 of 201.appendix appellants' annexure:- ---------------------------------------- annexure a - copy of application submitted u/s.17(1) with exhibits before the debt recovery tribunal, which is pending. respondent's annexures:- -------------------------------------------- nil. - true copy - manjula chellur, c.j.& k.vinod chandran, j.---------------------------------------- w.a.no.1230 of 2013 ----------------------------------------- dated this, the 14th day of august ..... ), the chief metropolitan magistrate or the district magistrate may take or cause to be taken such steps and use, or cause to be used, such force, as may, in his opinion, be necessary. (3) no act of the chief metropolitan magistrate or the district magistrate done in pursuance of this section shall be called in question in any court or before any .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Annamma

Court : Kerala

Reported in : II(1990)ACC101

..... compensation. there is a rider added to the above direction namely that execution for realisation of the compensation shall be taken against the appellant in the first instance. the tribunal has also apportioned the compensation amount among the various claimants. it is this award that is under challenge in the appeal.5. the point urged by the learned counsel ..... the deceased, who was the owner of the vehicle, could not claim the benefits of the policy because it was issued to cover only third party risks.4. the tribunal after evaluating the evidence produced by the parties held that the claimants were entitled to get an amount of rs. 2, 54,000/- as compensation with interest at 6 ..... third party risk and forbids use of a motor vehicle at a public place unless there is in force in relation to the use of the vehicle a policy of insurance complying the requirements of chapter viii of the motor vehicles act. in order to say that an insurance policy is one issued under chapter viii, the same shall .....

Mini Muthoottu Mutual Funds Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Centr ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2009]180TAXMAN444(Ker)

..... the show-cause notice against any order or notice giving rise to the tax arrear before any authority or tribunal or court, then, notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of any law for the time being in force, such appeal or reference or reply shall be deemed to have been withdrawn on the day on which the ..... so far as before making the adjustment of the refund no prior intimation as stipulated in section 245 of the income-tax act was issued to the petitioner.2. after passing of ext.p3 order, the tribunal without reference to ext.p3 order, allowed the petitioner's appeal against the assessment made which was the subject-matter of ..... ]245itr457(cal) and (5) shiv narain shivhare v. asstt. cit (inv.) : [1996]222itr620(mp) .10. since there has been no intimation in terms of section 245 of the act, therefore, the petitioner has been deprived of his right to raise any objections to the order of adjustment. therefore, the intimation to the extent of adjusting the amount is quashed .....