Skip to content


Arbitrarily - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: arbitrarily Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 922 results (0.022 seconds)
Sep 13 2002 (HC)

Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Gujarat Mineral Development C ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Sep-13-2002

Reported in: (2003)2GLR956

..... cited to point out that the high court held that the municipal commissioner had acted arbitrarily in considering the bid of the highest bidder which did not fulfil the eligibility conditions ..... public authority falters and violates rule of law by exercising its power to make contracts arbitrarily and acts with unjustifiable differentiation denying equality of treatment as has happened in the present .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 2002 (HC)

Mahendrasinh H. Jadeja and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-16-2002

Reported in: (2002)2GLR1604

..... the administrative authority has to act in accordance with the statutory recruitment rule and not arbitrarily in this case the respondent state has violated the statutory rules and the judicial review ..... furthermore the government had not even cared to look at the number of vacancies and arbitrarily decided that they would give only 78 vacancies to the direct recruit irrespective of requirement .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 29 2002 (HC)

A. Ramanathan and Company, Rep. by Its Managing Partner R. Panneerselv ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-29-2002

Reported in: (2002)2MLJ622

..... or entering into contracts or otherwise and it cannot act arbitrarily and enter into relationship with any person it likes at ..... power without making of law the state cannot therefore act arbitrarily in entering into relationship contractual or otherwise with a third ..... that it is arbitrary one further the respondents cannot act arbitrarily and once if they fix particular norms they cannot depart .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 22 2002 (HC)

Kailash Nath Singhal S/O Late Shri Baij Nath Agarwal, R/O H/192, Shast ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-22-2002

Reported in: 2002VIAD(Delhi)38; 97(2002)DLT602; 2002(64)DRJ209; (2002)IILLJ1048Del

..... concluded that the date of 1st november 1993 had not been arbitrarily fixed by the bank and thereforee dismissed the writ petition ..... imagination be said that the date of 1st november 1993 was arbitrarily or whimsically arrived at or that it created an artificial ..... date could more plausibly be said to have been arrived at arbitrarily or whimsically 25 learned counsel for the appellant did contend that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 2002 (HC)

Tci Seaways Limited Vs. Food Corporation of India, Regional Officer Ha ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-07-2002

Reported in: 2002(6)ALD685; 2002(6)ALT760

..... not possible to agree with the finding of the high court that cial had acted arbitrarily and unreasonably and was also influenced by extraneous considerations during its decision making process 46 ..... same was challenged before the high court on the ground that the contract was awarded arbitrarily for collateral consideration and is actuated by mala fides and sought for criminal investigation and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 10 2002 (SC)

Nirmala Anand Vs. Advent Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-10-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC2290; 2002(4)ALD3(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)862; 2002(6)BomCR134; JT2002(Suppl1)SC522; 2003MPLJ285(SC); 2002(4)SCALE601; (2002)5SCC481; 2002(2)LC906(SC)

..... discretion of the court but the discretion should not be used arbitrarily the discretion should be exercised on sound principles of law capable ..... to be exercised guided by sound and reasonable judicial principles not arbitrarily it was also cautioned that the court has to also take ..... it is lawful to do so the discretion cannot be exercised arbitrarily it has to be exercised in a sound and reasonable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 2002 (HC)

Dilip Kumar Chatterjee Vs. Coal India Limited and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-20-2002

Reported in: (2003)1CALLT405(HC)

..... it is also indicated that subsequent promotion was also given to the above named persons arbitrarily denying the promotion to the writ petitioner of course it was pointed out that shri ..... were interpolations in the marks obtained by shri chakraborty and that the departmental promotion committee arbitrarily did not select him for the promotion accordingly a mandate was issued upon the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 18 2002 (HC)

Backbone Tarmat-ng Jv Vs. National Highways Authority of India and anr ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-18-2002

Reported in: 99(2002)DLT862

..... to the norms standards and procedures laid down by them and cannot depart from them arbitrarily though that decision is not amenable to judicial review the court can examine the decision ..... contract with citizens but the court may interfere where it acts arbitrarily or contrary to public interest ii the government cannot arbitrarily choose any person it likes for entering into such a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 2002 (HC)

Sri Rajesh Chandra Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-13-2002

Reported in: (2005)2CALLT44(HC)

..... post simpliciter if however it is shown that such abolition was made arbitrarily or malafide or that the true intention of such an order of ..... loose its effective character if it is established to have been made arbitrarily malafide or as a mask of some penal action within the ..... post by the man or men in authority was set in motion arbitrarily and with malafide intent to bring the service career of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 2002 (HC)

Mardia Chemicals Limited Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Mar-27-2002

Reported in: AIR2002Guj404; (2002)2GLR1480; (2002)2GLR569

..... substitute its own discretion except where the discretion has been shown to have been exercised arbitrarily or capriciously or perversely or where the court had ignored the settled principles of law ..... cost of repetition be it stated that the learned judge has not exercised the discretion arbitrarily or capriciously or perversely or ignored the settled principles of law regulating grant or refusal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //