Skip to content


Arbitrarily - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: arbitrarily Year: 1971 Page 1 of about 101 results (0.016 seconds)
Jan 13 1971 (FN)

U.S. Bulk Carriers, Inc. Vs. Arguelles

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-13-1971

u s bulk carriers inc v arguelles 400 u s 351 1971 u s supreme court u s bulk carriers...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 10 1971 (SC)

Keshavsinh Dwarkadas Kapadia, Etc. Vs. Indian Engineering Company

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-10-1971

Reported in: AIR1972SC1538; (1971)2SCC706; [1972]1SCR695; 1972(4)LC70(SC)

a n ray j 1 these two appeals are by special leave against the judgment dated 17 october 1968 of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 1971 (SC)

S.R.Y. Sivaram Prasad Bahadur Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Hyde ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-19-1971

Reported in: AIR1972SC260; [1971]82ITR527(SC); (1971)3SCC726; [1972]1SCR320

k s hegde j 1 the common question of law which arises for decision in these appeals by certificate is...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 06 1971 (FN)

NLRB Vs. Plasters' Local

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-06-1971

nlrb v plasters local 404 u s 116 1971 u s supreme court nlrb v plasters local 404 u s...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 07 1971 (SC)

Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Calcutta Vs. Associated Industri ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-07-1971

Reported in: AIR1972SC445; [1971]82ITR586(SC); (1972)4SCC447a

..... selection committee should be final but at the same time the selection committee cannot act arbitrarily and cannot change the criteria qualification in the selection process during its midstream in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 1971 (SC)

The Divisional Forest Officer Vs. Mool Chand Sarougi Jain

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-06-1971

Reported in: AIR1971SC694; (1971)1SCC272; [1971]3SCR298; 1971(III)LC233(SC)

..... examination was illegal by reason of the fact that it enables the interviewers to act arbitrarily and therefore it contravenes art 44 of the constitution lastly it was contended that unless .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 01 1971 (SC)

The Bank of Bihar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-01-1971

Reported in: AIR1971SC1210; [1971]41CompCas591(SC); (1972)3SCC196; [1971]SuppSCR299; 1971(III)LC638(SC)

..... the wide amplitude of such power does not empower the tribunal to determine the compensation arbitrarily or to ignore settled principles relating to determination of compensation similarly although the act is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 19 1971 (HC)

Vithalrao Ramchandra Ghorpade Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-19-1971

Reported in: (1972)74BOMLR523; 1972MhLJ841

..... material to infer that the order is passed capriciously or arbitrarily in fact the machinery evolved under the circulars and the ..... government to pick and choose between servants and servants and arbitrarily compulsorily retire one under rule 165a while apply the ..... choice is more imaginary than real as the question of arbitrarily choosing one of the rules for compulsory retirement cannot conceivably .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 15 1971 (HC)

Mahboobur Rahman Vs. Public Service Commission, West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-15-1971

Reported in: AIR1972Cal348

..... eligible and once called for an interview the respondent had wrongfully and arbitrarily excluded the petitioner from the interview and as such from an ..... have thought that it had been invested with powers to act arbitrarily or that it was above the law in any manner under ..... the commission fails to act bona fide or if it acts arbitrarily as was the ex parte allegation on the writ petition this court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 16 1971 (HC)

Collector, Cuttack Vs. Rajib Bhol

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Jul-16-1971

Reported in: AIR1972Ori200; 37(1971)CLT348

..... appellant is that the value of the acquired land has been arbitrarily fixed at rupees 1 200 per acre the respondent sought to ..... short as has been urged for appellant the value has been arbitrarily fixed at rs 1 200 per acre because the respondent asserted ..... state from consideration and fixed the valueof the land in question arbitrarily sucha finding cannot be maintained 10 in the result the appeal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //