Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: appropriation no 2 act 2006 Sorted by: old Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 694 results (0.040 seconds)

Sep 19 2007 (HC)

Bhartiya Kishan Sangh and Uttam Singh Kushwah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)MPLJ548

..... and not improperly or mistakenly.supreme court has further held that -the location of headquarters by the government by the issue of the final notification under sub-section (5) of section 3 of the act was on a consideration by the cabinet sub-committee of the proposals submitted by the collectors concerned and the objections and suggestions received from the local authorities like gram panchayats and the general public, ..... : 1988(38)elt225(sc) , where the high court interfered on location of 12 revenue mandal headquarter and quashed the notification issued under section 3(5) on the ground that the government acted in breach of the guidelines in that one place or the other was more centrally located or that location at the other place would promote general public convenience, or that the headquarter should be fixed ..... in krishi upaj mandi samiti lahar district bhind and in this petition prayer has been made that the order of shifting the kvk from lahar to bhind by order dated 12.9.2006 (annexure p/1) be quashed and direction be given that the aforesaid kvk be established only at lahar district bhind.4. ..... and take appropriate decision in ..... body and funding body of the project, fully aware about the advantage, need and circumstances, to take an appropriate decision in the matter. ..... to take appropriate decision in the matter considering the dispute between the parties as well as the other facts and circumstances necessary for establishment of a particular centre and also considering the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2008 (HC)

Maa Sharda Wine Traders Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2009MP207; 2009(3)MPHT304; 2009[15]STR3; [2009]22STT105; (2009)22VST170(MP); 2009(5)AIRKarR498

..... supreme court or the high court declares the law on the question arising for consideration, it would not be appropriate for the court to direct that the circular should be given effect to and not the view expressed in a decision of this court ..... of such process should be emergence of excisable goods, which as per section 2(d) are the goods specified in the first and the second schedule of the central excise tariff act, 1985 as being subjected to duty of excise.therefore, 'manufacture' and 'excisable goods' are two independent concepts and that it is not necessary that a process amounting ..... 2006 circular is as under:the activities undertaken by the cbus is appropriately classifiable under clause (v) of the definition of 'business auxiliary service' which reads as under:(v) production or processing of goods for, on or behalf of the client ; this taxable service, however, excludes from its purview 'any activity' that amounts to 'manufacture' within the meaning of clause (f) of section 2 of the central excise act ..... , 2006, it was mentioned that as alcoholic beverages are not covered under central excise law, the production of beverages would not fall within the meaning of manufacture within the meaning of clause (f) of section 2 of the central excise act. ..... 2006 it was mentioned that as alcohol beverages are not covered under the central excise law the production of beverages would not fall within the meaning of manufacture as conceptualized under clause (f) of section 2 of the central excise act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 2009 (HC)

Vijay Choudhary Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2010(1)MPHT435

..... , produce it in reasonable time;(d) when the original is of such a nature as not to be easily movable;(e) when the original is a public document within the meaning of section 74;(f) when the original is a document of which a certified copy is permitted by this act, or by any other law in force in india, to be given in evidence;(g) when the originals consist of numerous accounts or other documents which cannot conveniently be examined in court, and the fact to be proved is the general result of the whole collections ..... -- no instrument chargeable with duty shall be admitted in evidence for any purpose by any person having by law or consent of parties authority to receive evidence, or shall be acted upon, registered or authenticated by any such person or by any public officer, unless such instrument is duly stamped:provided that,--(a) any such instrument not being an instrument chargeable with a duty not exceeding ten ..... evidence either by way of oral evidence of the contents of the unstamped document or the copy of it covered by section 63 of the indian evidence act would not fulfil the requirements of the proviso which enjoins upon the authority to receive nothing in evidence except the instrument itself. ..... it would be appropriate to enumerate the submissions of the learned senior counsel in seriatim as follows:(a) section 35 of the act and section 65 of the evidence act operate in two different fields and, hence, it would be inappropriate to compare ..... jamat mandal : (2006) 4 scc 98.13. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2010 (HC)

Bhartiya Alternative Medical Foundation and Others. Vs. the State of M ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... such institution for the time being in force shall make an application within 30 days from the date of commencement of the madhya pradesh chikitsiya shiksha sanstha (niyantran) sanshodhanadhiniyam, 2006 to the state government in such from and together with such fee as may be prescribed for grant of permission or for continuance of such institution of medical education thereafter: provided that nothing in this sub-section ..... section 7 (1) is quoted below :-7(1): where an institution of medical education established prior to the date of commencement of the madhya pradesh chikitsiya shiksha sanstha (niyantran) sanshodhan adhiniyam, 2006, which has not obtained permission of the state government, whether affiliated to any university or recognised by any board or not, is being administered or run on such date, the person responsible for establishing or administering or running ..... per section 7, in case any institution established prior to coming into the force of amendment act, 2006, which has not obtained permission of the state government to impart such course of instructions, it has to apply within 30 days from the date of commencement of amendment act. ..... the state government, thus it is the prerogative of the state government under adhiniyam, 1973 to give permission to the institutions to impart any other medical qualification in all other system of medicines, therapies or systems which may be considered appropriate. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2012 (HC)

Gahoi Food Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... impugned order annexure p/1 is illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and in accordance with the provisions of act of 2006, named as ''food safety and standard act, 2006'' and another act of 2003, named as ''the cigarettes and other tobacco products (prohibition of advertisement and regulation of trade and commerce, production, supply and distribution) act, 2003'', the appropriate authority has no power and jurisdiction to ban sale and use of gutka. ..... food safety and standards authority of india] vide notification dated 1st august, 2011, in exercise of the powers conferred to it by clause (1) of subsection (2) of section 92 read with section 26 of food safety and standards act, 2006 (34 of 2006), made the regulations, named as ''food safety and standards (prohibition and restrictions on sales) regulations, 2011''. ..... the petitioner has filed this petition with the following reliefs:- (a) that, a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be issued for quashing the impugned order/communication dated 31-03-2012 (annexure p/ 1) issued by the respondent no.3, with direction to the respondents in ..... hence, the authorities shall take appropriate steps that the food products contains tobacco and nicotine as gutka shall not be permitted to manufacture or sale in the areas and no licence can ..... of the petitioner, the petitioner can challenge the vires of regulations, 2011 because it is a statutory provision framed under the provisions of act of 2006. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 2002 (HC)

The Association of Punjab National Bank Employees Vs. the Deputy Gener ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2002(95)FLR923]; (2003)ILLJ706MP; 2002(4)MPHT221

..... this court under article 226 would give relief when the violation of fundamental right or some mandatory provisions has been violated or the act complied is contrary to law or without authority of law. ..... , 1964 (2) llj 105, had considered the question of entertaining a writ petition when certain notification issued under section 1(3) of the employees state insurance act, 1948 was challenged. ..... rohtas industrial staff union (t), (1976) i llj 274, the hon'ble supreme court had observed :--'if the industrial dispute relates to enforcement of a right or a obligation created under the act, then the only remedy available to the suitor is to get an adjudication under the act.'8. ..... act and as it effects the terms and conditions of the services of the employees, it would come within the provisions of schedule 3 which deals with the matter within the jurisdiction of industrial tribunal. ..... act. ..... act. ..... act. ..... act. ..... act. ..... act.4. ..... act, the petitioner should raise an industrial dispute and resolve the same in accordance with the procedure provided for it under the i.d. ..... act, 1947. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2006 (HC)

Rajendra Kumar JaIn Vs. Laxmi Bai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(4)MPLJ115

..... now another question arises that on the basis of subsequent event because of the death of landlord, decree under section 12(1)(f) of the act may be set aside by this court or the wife who is the sole legal heir of the respondent may continue with the aforesaid need ..... the case of appellant it will be appropriate to state one material fact that during the pendency of this appeal, plaintiff/respondent bhagwandas has died on 18-1-2006. ..... this order was passed by the trial court on an application filed by the landlord under section 13(6) of the act in which it is alleged that the tenant has not deposited the entire rent nor has furnished the receipts of deposit of ..... the appellate court considering the aforesaid aspect has granted decree under section 12(1)(a) of the act in which there is no infirmity nor any substantial question of law arises in this ..... the entire rent on 20-3-1998 and there was in fact no default on the part of the appellant, and on compliance of section 13(1) of the act the decree under section 12(1)(a) of the act could not have been passed against the appellant. ..... as the preamble shows the madhya pradesh accommodation control act, 1961 has been enacted for expeditious trial of eviction cases on the ground of bonafide requirement of landlords and generally to regulate and control ..... thereafter the landlord filed an application under section 13(6) of the act to strike out the defence of the appellant on the ground that the rent as directed by the trial court on 6-1-1998 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2006 (HC)

Purshottam Khatri Vs. Cit

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(MP)18; [2006]155TAXMAN520(MP)

..... as substantial questions of law of general importance relating to the interpretation of the proviso to section 5(1)(c) and section 10(4)(ii) of the income tax act, 1961 relating to the taxability of the income of a person who is not ordinarily resident in india arise for decision and it will be appropriate if the highest court of the country considers the questions and decides the same.8. ..... the foreign exchange regulations act that he had brought into ..... 114 of 2000 under section 260a of the act before this court and in the judgment dated 25-1-2006, we held that under the proviso to section 5(1)(c) of the act, the total income of previous year of a person not ordinarily resident in india, accruing or arising to him outside india is exempt from tax under the act and the assessee has been able to establish before the tribunal by furnishing declarations under the notifications issued under ..... by the assessee/applicant under section 261 of the income tax act, 1961 (for short the act) for a certificate from the high court that the appeal against the judgment of the honble high court dated 25-1-2006 in ma (it) no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2006 (HC)

Purshottam Khatri Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2007]290ITR277(MP)

..... 114 of 2000 inasmuch as substantial questions of law of general importance relating to the interpretation of the proviso to section 5(1)(c) and section 10(4)(ii) of the it act, 1961 relating to the taxability of the income of a person who is not ordinarily resident in india arise for decision and it will be appropriate if the highest court of the country considers the questions and decides the same.8. ..... remittances of foreign currency directly received from abroad, foreign currency which had been brought by the assessee from outside india after making declarations under the notifications issued under the foreign exchange regulations act and foreign currency within the limits beyond which the declarations had to be made at the time of visiting india and held remaining deposits of foreign currency in the nre accounts of the assessee totalling ..... , 2006, we held that under the proviso to section 5(1)(c) of the act, the total income of previous year of a person not ordinarily resident in india, accruing or arising to him outside india is exempt from tax under the act and the assessee has been able to establish before the tribunal by furnishing declarations under the notifications issued under the foreign exchange regulations act that he had brought into india foreign currencies in the form of pounds and dollars which ..... purshottam khatri (2006) 203 ctr (mp) 1. ..... , 2006 in ma (it) no. ..... , 2006 in ma (it) no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2007 (HC)

M.P. Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. and ors. Vs. Rudra Prasad Mishra

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ50MP

..... , learned senior counsel, for the appellant submits that the appellant is working only from 1989 and after 1999 only by virtue of interim order he is continuously working.in the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to modify the order of the learned single judge to the extent that the respondent shall continue in service and shall be regularized as and when vacancy arises. ..... otherwise as there has been change in law the same has to be appropriately understood and properly applied.14. ..... appropriate order in this regard be issued within one month ..... 6088/2006 is called in question by the appellants invoking the jurisdiction under section 2(1) of the madhya pradesh uchcha nayaiaya (khand nyaypeeth ko appeal) adhiniyam, 200s (for brevity 'the act').the facts which are essential to be exposited for disposal of the present appeal are that the respondent had preferred m.p. no. ..... the defensibility and legal acceptability of the order dated december 11, 2006 passed by the learned single judge in w.p. (s) no. ..... our attention was drawn to an order of a i division bench of this court date september 7, 2006 in state of punjab v. ..... after so stating their lordships in paragraph 44 have expressed the opinion as under 2006-ii-llj-722 at p. ..... ...the high court acting under article 226 of the constitution, should not ordinarily issue directions for absorption, regularization, or permanent continuance unless the recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms of the constitutional scheme .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //