Application - Judgment Search Results

The Application No.1042 of 2012. Vs. Unknown

Court: Chennai

..... the inspector of police rajapalayam north police station has registered a case against the applicant at the instigation of the respondent therefore they both are liable to be punished ..... deputy superintendent of police virudhunagar is further directed to release the vehicle immediately to the applicant and c the petitioner is at liberty to initiate criminal proceedings against the respondent .....

Suo Motu Contempt Application No. 426 of 1994 Vs. Mrs. Manonmani Muthu ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1995)1MLJ375

..... the appellant before the supreme court a senior advocate of long standing made a written application to the special judge couched in scurrilous language making imputation that the judge was a .....

T.K.Srinivasan Vs. Not Applicable

Court: Chennai

..... properly appreciated by the learned trial judge who blind foldedly declined the permission without proper application of mind and without assigning sustainable reasons 6 this court paid its anxious consideration to ..... judge committed a grave error in passing such a crippled and non speaking order without application of mind rejecting the permission sought for this court is of the considered view that .....

In Re: Application of Mr. Aruna Chala Aiyar, Attorney, High Court

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 81Ind.Cas.732

..... counter petitioner having engaged him for the purpose of appearing in the application to set aside the sale of the property wherein he was ..... appear for him and get the sale confirmed and oppose the application for setting aside the sale and that he agreed to pay ..... learned judge held that the english cases on the subject are applicable and pointed out the difference between the special lien over the .....

T.V.Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Ltd Vs. Not Applicable

Court: Chennai

..... and if thought fit approving with or without modification a scheme of arrangement of the applicant company with m s tvs interconnect systems limited demerged company and their respective shareholders 2 ..... the applicant company hereinafter referred to as the resulting company was incorporated on 11 10 1929 as .....

Vanavil Dyes and Chemicals Ltd., Rep. by the Manager Commercial Operat ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003LC299(Madras)

..... forth his objection on the question of maintainability of the application under section 35ee 4 cannot be countenanced that the ..... fresh consideration on the question of maintainability of the revision application and also on merits the first respondent shall return ..... therefore the first respondent lacked jurisdiction even to entertain the application for condonation of delay it was then contended that .....

K. Arumugam, Vs. the Presiding Officer, I Addl. Labour Court and the M ...

Court: Chennai

..... not been sufficiently explained the labour court heard all the interim applications together and passed a common order dated 20 6 2008 ..... the labour court by the common order dismissed all the applications stating that the delay in moving the court was not sufficiently ..... have stated the very same reasons which were stated in the applications to condone the delay though it was stated that they were .....

Review Applicant: Mrs. Farida Shaukath Vs. Unit Trust of India, Madras ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1999(2)CTC736

..... decision of the 1st respondent though it defeats the substantive legitimate expectation of the review applicant is well justified on wednesbury principle of reasonableness and the same cannot be said ..... decision of the 1st respondent though it defeats the substantive legitimate expectation of the review applicant is well justified on wednesbury principle of reasonableness and the same cannot be said .....

Vanavil Dyes and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Joint Secretary (Revision Applicat ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003(158)ELT432(Mad)

..... forth his objection on the question of maintainability of the application under section 35ff 4 cannot be countenanced that the ..... fresh consideration on the question of maintainability of the revision application and also on merits the first respondent shall return ..... therefore the first respondent lacked jurisdiction even to entertain the application for condonation of delay it was then contended that .....

C.E.Sathyanarayana Reddi Vs. C.E.Sulochana and Others

Court: Chennai

..... property in the said suit the respondents herein filed an application for rejecting the suit under order vii rule 11 of ..... mandatory injunction various issues were framed in which the review applicant participated and obtained a decree against him which has become ..... title and partition is concerned the learned counsel for the applicant would also rely upon the following decisions i st aleysiusanglo .....