Appear - Year 1998 - Judgments

Jan 02 1998 (TRI)

Atlas Copco Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-02-1998

Reported in: (1998)(59)ECC596

..... order to ensure smooth proper and safe operation of the motor in these circumstances it appears clear that control panel cannot be regarded as a component part of compressor 9 shri .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 19 1998 (TRI)

National Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-19-1998

Reported in: (1998)(61)ECC269

..... hearing before the collector held on 27 1 92 the managing director and their consultant appeared including j b gupta they did not stress the above point and stated that certain .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 1998 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Shri Ram Vinyl and Chemical

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-25-1998

Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT871TriDel

..... purportedly containing the appeal was received by them on 10 10 1996 3 shri sharma appearing for the respondents submits that this was letter addressed to the superintendent and not to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 1998 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. High Energy Batteries (India)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-22-1998

Reported in: (1998)(61)ECC289

..... dates of delivery of such goods and of the excisable goods under assessment as may appear reasonable to the proper officer in terms of this rule it is seen that 7 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 1998 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Amrit Petrochemical Industries

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-22-1998

Reported in: (1998)(104)ELT438TriDel

..... 00 as claimed by the assessees for their product oil saver of engine does not appear to be correct in terms of explanatory notes to hsn page 533 because the sub .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 21 1998 (TRI)

Yalif Lam Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-21-1998

Reported in: (1998)LC628Tri(Delhi)

..... the goods and redemption thereof was not warranted 5 shri l b attar ld advocate appears for the appellants the revenue is represented by shri satnam singh ld sdr 6 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 21 1998 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Raj Iron Foundry

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-21-1998

Reported in: (1999)(110)ELT537TriDel

..... in the rg 23a part ii as per s r p procedure as such there appear no violation of central excise rules as per s r p procedure the assessee are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 20 1998 (TRI)

Cnm Impex Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-20-1998

Reported in: (1998)(104)ELT417TriDel

..... only after affording an opportunity of hearing to them the appellants are also directed to appear before the commissioner appeals as and when the hearing is fixed without seeking adjournment both .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 19 1998 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Ferro Alloys Corpn. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-19-1998

Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT224Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the ground of appeal taken by the department in the present appeal before us it appears that against the impugned order of the commissioner appeals is totally with reference to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 1998 (TRI)

Waghji Lakhmidas and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-22-1998

Reported in: (1998)(61)ECC652

..... cause notice the party was not treated as owner of the goods and accordingly it appeared that the department could not take any action whereas subsequent to the issue of show .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Appear - Judgment Search Results