Appear - Year 1997 - Judgments

Jan 01 1997 (TRI)

Torrent Gujarat Bio-tech. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-01-1997

Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT305Tri(Mum.)bai

..... antifoam storage and like materials have similarly been denied modvat credit the issue to us appears arguable and it cannot be held that prima facie case for totally dispensing with the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 1997 (TRI)

Shah and Mahajan Chem. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-04-1997

Reported in: (1997)LC626Tri(Delhi)

..... present appeal has been filed 3 shri j b shah managing director of the appellant appeared before us and made submission against the impugned orders he contended that the restriction in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 1997 (TRI)

Jagatjit Industries Limited Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-08-1997

Reported in: (1998)(99)ELT509TriDel

..... finding the appellants have filed these seven appeals 3 shri p n puri learned advocate appearing for the appellants submits that when the department issued a show cause notice for the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 1997 (TRI)

Mount Conductors Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-08-1997

Reported in: (1997)(94)ELT260TriDel

..... by any of the processes like extrusion rolling drawing or forging 8 the lower authorities appear to have focussed attention more on the aspect of the differences existing between the various .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 1997 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Madras Motors Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-07-1997

Reported in: (1997)(94)ELT526TriDel

..... challenged the classification of the goods in question as machinery parts in fact the consultant appearing before the collector of central excise appeals had stated that for the subsequent period to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 1997 (TRI)

Ashok Leyland Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-08-1997

Reported in: (1997)(94)ELT371TriDel

..... allowed to be cleared under chapter x procedure are not i c engine parts 4 appearing for the appellants shri t vishwanathan ld counsel referred to the condition no i of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 1997 (TRI)

Thacker Pulversing Co. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-07-1997

Reported in: (1997)(94)ELT359TriDel

..... was busy and the personal hearing was refixed on 23 9 1985 however instead of appearing the appellants sent a written request dated 14 9 1995 for cross examination of chief .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 1997 (TRI)

C.C.E. Vs. Universal Information Commn.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-07-1997

Reported in: (1997)(94)ELT543TriDel

..... the matter was posted for hearing on 7 7 1997 when shri m jayaraman jdr appeared for the appellants revenue the respondents have prayed for decision on merits 4 shri m .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 1997 (TRI)

S.S. Bhatia Importers and Traders Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-02-1997

Reported in: (1998)(98)ELT705TriDel

..... the bottom of this document is an endorsement which is not very clear and which appears to refer to bill of entry number thereby suggesting that the proforma invoice was acted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 09 1997 (TRI)

Eagle Flask Industries (India) Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-09-1997

Reported in: (1997)LC299Tri(Delhi)

..... that stage 4 example of pressure cooker is cited in the memorandum of appeal it appears that board has instructed that where utensils are placed inside pressure cooker for purpose of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Appear - Judgment Search Results