And 24 - Judgment Search Results

Collector of 24 Parganas and ors. Vs. Lalith Mohan Mullick and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC2121; JT1988(1)SC598; 1988Supp(1)SCC578

Matched in: Parties Collector of 24 Parganas and ors. Vs. Lalith Mohan Mullick and ors.

Collectors of 24 Parganas and ors. Vs. Lalit Mohan Mullick and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC622; 1986(1)SCALE177; (1986)2SCC138; [1986]1SCR271; 1986(1)LC499(SC)

reversing the Judgment of a learned Single Judge. The matter relates to land acquisition proceedings. The Collector of 24 Parganas and others are the appellants. 2. Under Section 4 of the West Bengal Land Development and Planning

E 24 Glamoru Limited vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

Court: Delhi

others, it takes the form of a general prohibition against the State as well as others: Articles 17,23 and 24. The enunciation of rights eitherSigned By:JAI (2017) 10 SCC 1 Signing Date:29.05.2026 Page 57 of 68express or by

KARTHIKEYAN, (Male/24 years), (A2), Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector ...

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. KARTHIKEYAN, (Male/24 years), (A2), No.2/121, Parainagar,Gummidigampatti Village,Tirupattur District 635 9012. Prabu(a3) Son of Mr. Senthilkumar, G,1-135, Thannikinaru Vattam,Narsampatti Village, Tirupattur Taluk District 635 901..Petitioner(s)...

M/s. 24 HRS Productions Vs The Superintendent of GST and Central Excis ...

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.12087 and 12089 of 2026 M/s. 24 HRS Productions rep. By its Proprietor Mr.Kaliamoorthy

24 X 7 Learning Private Limited. Vs. ZaIn Family Trust a Private Trust ...

Court: Karnataka

Matched in: Parties 24 X 7 Learning Private Limited. Vs. ZaIn Family Trust a Private Trust, and anr.

Decided on 24.09.2013 Vs. General Public

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Chandigarh FAO No.1358 OF20063 FAO No.1358 OF2006-3- rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed as such. (S.S.SARON) JUDGE (S.P.BANGARH) 24.09.2013 JUDGE mamta Mamta 2013.09.26 13:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

“24. Now Coming to the Legal Aspect of the Matter Vs. Central Admini ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

against respondent No.2 and the charge-sheet too was cryptic. The observations in this behalf are contained in paras 24 and 25 of the impugned order, which read as under :- “24. Now coming to the legal aspect

“24. Initiating the Argument Shri N.K. Tanwar Vs. M/S Goodyear India ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

this regard by the Government of Punjab in favour of the respondent- Company, which was duly registered on 24.04.1962 before the office of Sub-Registrar of Assurances, Ballabhgarh. Possession of the suit land was handed over to the

24 Manai thelungu Chetty Community of Uraiyur, Represented by Managing ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1997)2MLJ235

Matched in: Parties 24 Manai thelungu Chetty Community of Uraiyur, Represented by Managing Trustee Madurai Chettiar Vs. Arulmigu Ranganathaswamy at Sri Ranganatha Swamy Devasthanam, Represented by Its Executive Officer