Skip to content


Allowance - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: allowance Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.128 seconds)
Jan 24 2002 (HC)

Tiruchirapalli District Amaravathi Consumer Co-operative Societies Who ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2002

Reported in: [2002(94)FLR185]; (2002)IIILLJ230Mad

..... has been filed against the order of theappellate authority under the tamil nadu subsistance allowance act deputycommissioner of labour tiruchirapalli 2 the brief facts are the workman was an ..... petition has been filed 3 the counsel for the writ petitioner argued that thesubsistance allowance is payable only if the petitioner approaches theauthorities within the period prescribed under the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 2002 (TRI)

KinjIn Food Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Mumbai-vi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-25-2002

Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT203Tri(Mum.)bai

..... not as a result of the manufacture and no duty was payable on it and allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 2002 (TRI)

Bajaj Oil Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Feb-26-2002

Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT124Tri(Kol.)kata

..... engaged in clandestine removal of their goods accordingly i set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal with consequential relief to the appellants stay petition also gets disposed of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 2002 (TRI)

Babcok Borsig Power Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Feb-25-2002

Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT628Tri(Chennai)

..... invoking larger period confirming demands and imposing penalty is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief if any

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 2002 (TRI)

Future Innovations Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus., New Delhi (icd)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2002

Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT98TriDel

..... assembly and alarm 7 in view of our findings above the appeal succeeds and is allowed with consequential relief to the appellants

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 2002 (TRI)

Nilmac Packaging Industries Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex., Mumbai-iii

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-25-2002

Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC112

..... under heading 96 08 exemption contained in notification 83 90 5 the appeal is accordingly allowed the order of the commissioner appeals set aside the assistant commissioner shall after receiving the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 2002 (TRI)

Premier Aryco India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Bangalore

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Feb-25-2002

Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT595Tri(Bang.)

..... prima fade case as urged by the party accord ingly these two stay applications are allowed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Nirma Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-25-2002

Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC831

..... in clause a then in terms of sub rule 1 the assessee shall not be allowed credit on such quantity which is used in the manufacture of exempted goods consequently where .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 22 2002 (TRI)

Roy Francis Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Feb-22-2002

Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT112Tri(Bang.)

..... determined in the de novo proceedings 4 in view of our findings the appeals are allowed as remand in the above terms

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 2002 (TRI)

Bhairav Printers Vs. Commissioner of Customs (i)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-26-2002

Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT560Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the appellant as two separate individual legal entities therefore the appeal of bhairav printers is allowed as far as the appeal of ranjit sanghvi is concerned there has been a violation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //