Allowance - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: allowance Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.124 seconds)M. Shantilal Vs. Kasturchand Parshottamdas and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-21-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Guj38; (1995)2GLR1706
order1 this civil revision application is filed under section 115 of the code of civil procedure is directed against the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSarpIn Pharmacal Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-1995
Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT330TriDel
..... s sarpin pharmacal under which the brand names owned by m s mercury laboratories were allowed to be used by m s sarpin pharmacal on certain terms and conditions incorporated in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise Vs. Tarapur Cables (i) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-15-1995
Reported in: (1996)(85)ELT125Tri(Mum.)bai
..... against the order in appeal no sdk 257 b ii 91 dated 30 7 1991 allowing the appeal of the respondent the revenue is aggrieved by this order the respondents are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollr. of Central Excise Vs. Assam Timber Treating Works
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-1995
Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT443TriDel
..... the goods based on profits that other sellers of this product had earned we therefore allow this appeal by remand 4 the collector appeals shall determine afresh the actual margin of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKhanna Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-1995
Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT109TriDel
..... related matters concerning time bar and shall thereafter pass orders in accordance with law appeals allowed by way of remand
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCc Vs. Shah Trading Co.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Dec-13-1995
Reported in: (1996)(64)LC613Tri(Chennai)
..... not sustainable in law and the same is set aside and the department s appeal allowed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKwality Ice Cream Co. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-1995
Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT445TriDel
..... modvat credit following the decision of the tribunal i set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVazir Sultan Tobacco Inds. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-1995
Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT260TriDel
..... in the result we set aside the impugned order passed by the authorities below and allow both the appeals
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSafari Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-1995
Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT298TriDel
..... erroneous 8 in the result the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBpl Sanyo Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Dec-15-1995
Reported in: (1996)(63)LC255Tri(Bang.)alore
..... the madurai bombay i and madhya pradesh collectorate that it had been decided not to allow modvat credit on dry battery cells used in the manufacture of electronic quartz clocks he .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial