Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 2,942 results (0.604 seconds)

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... conditions;(ii) mitigate the punishment awarded;(iii) commute such punishment to any lesser punishment or punishments mentioned in the army act, 1950, (46 of 1950) the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the air force act, 1950, (45 of 1950) as the case may be;(c) enhance the sentence awarded by a court martial:provided that no such sentence shall be ..... more of the original charges, no fresh investigation or other action shall be taken under the relevant provision of the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the air force act, 1950 (45of 1950) as the case may be, or rules and regulations made there under, in relation to the said charge or ..... admit an application unless it is satisfied that the applicant had availed of the remedies available to him under the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950) as the case may be, and respective rules and regulations made thereunder.(2) for the purposes of sub-section .....

Anand Kumar Bindal Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation and Ors. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1957All136

..... . see state of west bengal v. subodh gopal bose : [1954]1scr587 and dwarkadas srinivas of bombay v. skelapur spinning and weaving co. ltd., 1954 scr 674: (air 1954 so 119) (k) (known as the second sholapur case).so even if it were a case of deprivation of property, as contemplated by article 31(1) and ..... different provinces. by a notification of the central government, chapters i, ii, iii and viii of the act were brought into force throughout india with effect from september 1, 1948. by another notification of april, 1, 1950, the provisions of sections 44 and 45 of chapter iv and the whole of chapter vii were applied to all ..... is not a payment for services rendered,'a definition which the supreme court in commissioner, hindu religious endowments, madras v. sri lakshmindra thirtha swamiar, 1954 scr 1005: (air 1954 3c 282) (e), considered brought out the essential characteristics 'of a tax as distinguished from other forms of imposition.the employer's special contribution under the employees .....

Mohd. Shameem Vs. Pradeep Kumar and Another

Court : Allahabad

..... 881 of 2013, between mohd. shameem versus pradeep kumar and another whereby learned single judge has refused to draw contempt proceedings against the respondents u/s 12 of the act, who are up nagar ayukta, nagar nigam, allahabad and encroachment- in-charge, nagar nigam, allahabad and has dismissed aforementioned contempt application moved by the appellant/ applicant/ ..... and consequently, we benefittigly recapitulate some of those binding precedents as under- in midnapore peoples' co-op. bank ltd. and ors. vs. chunilal nanda and ors.:air 2006 sc 2190 it has been held by the apex court as under:- "11. the position emerging from these decisions, in regard to appeals against orders in contempt ..... contempt against the chief justice and other judge was not appealable under section 19, sub-section (1)." in j. s. parihar vs. ganpat duggar and others: (air 1997 sc 113) a full bench of hon'ble supreme court has held as under:- "4. the question is : whether an appeal against the directions issued by .....

Saiyad Mustaq Ali and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

..... facie evidence and material adduced by the complainant has applied his judicial mind to the facts of the case and legal provisions relating thereto. the revision has no force and accordingly liable to be dismissed. 10. the only question involved in this revision is-whether the impugned order of the learned chief judicial magistrate, mahoba issuing ..... precedent for issuing process under section 204 is the satisfaction of the magistrate that there is sufficient ground. 13. in shievjee singh vs. nagrendra tiwary and others, air 2010 sc 2261 the apex court held thus:- "the object of examining the complainant and the witnesses is to ascertain the truth or falsehood of the compliant and ..... and illegal as from the facts and material produced before him by the complainant, prima facie no offence under section 420 i.p.c. and dowry prohibition act have been committed. 11. chapter xv of the code relates to the complaint to the magistrates and covers cases of actual commencing of proceedings in a court .....

Gopal singh visharad and ors Vs. jahoor ahmad and others

Court : Allahabad

..... with legal maxims, latin terms, words and phrases" 2 nd edition reprint 2007 at page 687: "expression. a word, phrase or form of speech; the act of manifesting by action or language."37. the distinction between the "judgment" and "decree", therefore, is that the judgment contains reasons as well as the conclusions ..... with legal maxims, latin terms, words and phrases" nd edition reprint 2007 at page 11 the term "adjudication" has been defined as under: "adjudication. the act of adjudicating; the process of trying and determining a case judicially. the application of the law to the facts and an authoritative declaration of the result."28. ..... from the decisions in ventataraya v. mallappa, air 1946 madras 348; sri ram chandra mardaray deo v. bhalu patnaik, air 1950 orissa 125 (fb); dagduba v. abdul gafoor, air 1954 hyderabad 104; lalchand v. kanhaiyalal, air 1961 mp 223; rajeshwar rai v. shankar rai, air 1962 patna 398; bai vasanti v. suryaprasad, air 1969 gujarat 152; and, west bengal .....

(Ayodhya Dispute) Gopal Singh Visharad (Now Dead) and ors. Vs. Zahoor ...

Court : Allahabad

..... -50)sri gopal singh visharad v. zahoor ahmad and others the instant suit has been filed on the assertion that the father of the plaintiff on 14.1.1950 was not allowed to touch the deity. accordingly the injunction has been sought on behalf of the defendants including the state government to not disallow the plaintiff to ..... the disputed structure within inner courtyard in the night of 22nd/23rd december, 1949 and prior thereto the same existed in the outer courtyard. therefore, on 16.01.1950 when suit-1 was filed the said idol existed in the inner courtyard under the central dome of the disputed structure, i.e., prior to the filing of ..... massive structure of religious nature is required to be maintained as national monument under the ancient monument archeological site and remains act, 1958. the apex court in rajiv mankotia v. secretary to the president of india and others, air 1997 supreme court page 2766 at para 21 directed the government of india to maintain such national monuments. thus, .....

Prof. Ramesh Chandra, Vice Chancellor Bundelkhand University Vs. State ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC3181

..... inquiry officer appointed under section 8(1) and hence he could not be asked to submit the comment on the said enquiry report, was without any force because it was merely a technical objection.(3) in respect of test conducted for the cpmt, the petitioner was held responsible accepting the finding recorded by ..... [1975]2scr674 , the supreme court observed that where government activity involves public element, the 'citizen has a right to gain equal treatment', and when 'the state acts to the prejudice of a person, it has to be supported by legality.' functioning of 'democratic form of government demands vequallty and absence of arbitrariness and discrimination.'30. ..... kumar jain and ors. : (1995)1scc638 ; and bahadursinh lakhubhai gohil v. jagdishbhai m. kamalia and ors. air 2004 sc 1159.51. the inquiry officer appointed by the state government under section 8(1) of the act submitted the report recording the following findings of fact:(1) there had been some errors in evaluation of the answer .....

Ajai Kumar Kashyap Vs. District and Sessions Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2954

..... peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the central government including para-military forces or armed forces as is empowered in this behalf by general or special order by the central government, or any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to ..... any person and taken down in writing that any narcotic drug, or psychotropic substance, or controlled substance in respect of which an offence punishable under this act has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of the commission of such offence or any illegally acquired property or any ..... or other article which may furnish evidence of holding any illegally acquired property which is liable for seizure or freezing or forfeiture under chapter v-a of this act is kept or concealed in any building, conveyance enclosed place, may between sunrise and sunset, - '(a) enter into and search any such building, conveyance .....

Gajraj Singh Son of Sri Attar Singh and Meerut-rohata-barnava-binauli- ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2915

..... ;(c) belonging to the cantonment board meerut;(d) carrying solely funeral parties;(e) belong to persons and properties exempted under section 3 of indian tolls (army and air force) act, 1901 (2 of 1901);(f) belong/deployed in election;(g) tractor of agriculturists used solely for agriculture purposes;(h) buses carrying school students;(i) ambulance carrying ..... code of civil procedure, 1908'. now at the date when section 55 was enacted, namely, december 27, 1969, being the date of coming into force of the act, section 100 of the code of civil procedure specified three grounds on which a second appeal could be brought to the high court and one of these ..... laws for the time being in force relating to intestate succession including the travancore christian succession act, 1092 so far as indian christians in tranvancore are concerned. this contention was sought to be supported by reference to the decision of the travancore-cochin high court in 'kurian augusty v. devassy aley air 1957 trav co. 1. .....

Mohd. Arif S/O Saleem Qureshi Vs. Mirza Glass Works Through Its Princi ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR129]

..... . thus the said authority has trapping of court and is a tribunal. any order, thus, passed by authority under section 15 of the payment of wages act, 1936 is an order passed by tribunal. the special appeal being barred against an order of one judge exercising jurisdiction under article 226/227 of the constitution ..... a) of a tribunal court or statutory arbitrator made or purported to be made in the exercise or purported exercise of jurisdiction under any uttar pradesh act or under any central act, with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the state list or the concurrent list in the seventh schedule to the constitution, or (b ..... gazette, appoint [a presiding officer of any labour court or industrial tribunal, constituted under the industrial disputes act, 1947 (14 of 1947), or under any corresponding taw relating to the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes in force in the state or] any commissioner for workmen's compensation or other office with experience as a judge .....