Skip to content


Mohd. Arif S/O Saleem Qureshi Vs. Mirza Glass Works Through Its Principal Employer/Manager and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Civil

Court

Allahabad High Court

Decided On

Case Number

Special Appeal No. 884 of 2005

Judge

Reported in

[2005(107)FLR129]

Acts

Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15(1) and 18; Court Rules - Rule 5; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 15(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Appellant

Mohd. Arif S/O Saleem Qureshi

Respondent

Mirza Glass Works Through Its Principal Employer/Manager and ors.

Appellant Advocate

Y.S. Saxena and ;D.K. Kulshreshtha, Advs.

Respondent Advocate

V. Sahai, Adv. and ;C.S.C.

Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Excerpt:


.....court under article 226 must necessarily stop at that. thereafter, if the decision taken by the executive is capable of challenge and, there exist appropriate legal grounds for such challenge, it may also be open to the court to quash the decision and to require reconsideration. but no direction in the nature of mandamus whether interim or final can be issued by the court under article 226 to the executive to necessarily acquire a particular area of a particular piece of land for a particular public purpose. section 4; compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held, renewal of lease in favour of petitioners would not take away power of state government of compulsory acquisition of land. renewal of lease would at best be taken into consideration for determining quantum of compensation. .....a conjoint reading of section 15(1) with section 18 of the payment of wages act, t936, it is clear that the authority empowered to decide claims arising out of deduction from wages is entrusted all the powers of civil court under the code of civil procedure for the purposes of taking evidence and for attendance and compelling the protection of documents. thus the said authority has trapping of court and is a tribunal. any order, thus, passed by authority under section 15 of the payment of wages act, 1936 is an order passed by tribunal. the special appeal being barred against an order of one judge exercising jurisdiction under article 226/227 of the constitution arising out of a writ petition from an order of tribunal, the preliminary objection raised by counsel for the respondents has substance.6. the appeal is barred under chapter viii rule 5 of the rules of the curt and is dismissed as not maintainable.

Judgment:


Ajoy Nath Ray, C.J. and Ashok Bhushan, J.

1. A preliminary objection has been raised by counsel for the respondents that this special appeal is not maintainable in view of the fact that writ petition was filed against an order passed by Prescribed Authority against the appellant under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936.

2. Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court provides that special appeal shall not lie from a judgment of learned single Judge passed in exercise of jurisdiction conferred by Article 226/227 of the Constitution in respect of any judgment, or order or award of a tribunal, Court or statutory arbitrator.. Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court is extracted below:-

[5. Special appeal.- An appeal shall lie to the Court from a judgment (not being a judgment passed in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction in respect of a decree or order made by a Court subject to the Superintendence of the Court and not being] an order made in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction or in the exercise of its of Superintendence or in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction [or in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred by Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution in respect of any judgment, order or award (a) of a tribunal Court or statutory arbitrator made or purported to be made in the exercise or purported exercise of jurisdiction under any Uttar Pradesh Act or under any Central Act, with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the State List or the Concurrent List in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, or (b) of the Government or any Officer or authority, made or purported to be made in the exercise or purported exercise of appellate or revisional jurisdiction under any such Act of one Judge.]'

3. The question for consideration is as to whether the Prescribed Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is a tribunal. Section 15(1) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 provides that the State government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint the Presiding Officer of any Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal, or under any corresponding law relating to the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes or any Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation or other officer with experience as a Judge of a Civil Court to be authority to hear and decide all claims. Section 15(1) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is extracted below:-

15. Claims arising out of deductions from wages or delay In payment of wages and penalty for malicious or vexatious claims.- (1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint [a presiding officer of any Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal, constituted under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), or under any corresponding taw relating to the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes in force in the State or] any Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation or other office with experience as a Judge of a Civil Court or as a stipendiary Magistrate to be the authority to hear and decide for any specified area all claims arising out of deductions from the wages, or delay in payment of wages, [of persons employed or paid in that area, including all matters, incidental to such claims:

4. Section 18 provides for powers of authorities appointed under Section 15 which is extracted be low:-

'18. Powers of authorities appointed under Section 15.- Every authority appointed under sub-section (1) of Section 15 shall have all the powers of a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure; 1908 (5 of 1908), for the purpose of taking evidence and of enforcing the attendance of witnesses and compelling the production of documents, and every such authority shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for all the purposes of Section 195 and of [Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974).]'

5. From a conjoint reading of Section 15(1) with Section 18 of the Payment of Wages Act, T936, it is clear that the authority empowered to decide claims arising out of deduction from wages is entrusted all the powers of Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure for the purposes of taking evidence and for attendance and compelling the protection of documents. Thus the said authority has trapping of Court and is a tribunal. Any order, thus, passed by authority under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is an order passed by tribunal. The special appeal being barred against an order of one Judge exercising jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution arising out of a writ petition from an order of tribunal, the preliminary objection raised by counsel for the respondents has substance.

6. The appeal is barred under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Curt and is dismissed as not maintainable.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //