Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: old Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 2,958 results (0.101 seconds)

Feb 25 2010 (HC)

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... conditions;(ii) mitigate the punishment awarded;(iii) commute such punishment to any lesser punishment or punishments mentioned in the army act, 1950, (46 of 1950) the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the air force act, 1950, (45 of 1950) as the case may be;(c) enhance the sentence awarded by a court martial:provided that no such sentence shall be ..... more of the original charges, no fresh investigation or other action shall be taken under the relevant provision of the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the air force act, 1950 (45of 1950) as the case may be, or rules and regulations made there under, in relation to the said charge or ..... admit an application unless it is satisfied that the applicant had availed of the remedies available to him under the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950) as the case may be, and respective rules and regulations made thereunder.(2) for the purposes of sub-section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1956 (HC)

Anand Kumar Bindal Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation and Ors. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1957All136

..... . see state of west bengal v. subodh gopal bose : [1954]1scr587 and dwarkadas srinivas of bombay v. skelapur spinning and weaving co. ltd., 1954 scr 674: (air 1954 so 119) (k) (known as the second sholapur case).so even if it were a case of deprivation of property, as contemplated by article 31(1) and ..... different provinces. by a notification of the central government, chapters i, ii, iii and viii of the act were brought into force throughout india with effect from september 1, 1948. by another notification of april, 1, 1950, the provisions of sections 44 and 45 of chapter iv and the whole of chapter vii were applied to all ..... is not a payment for services rendered,'a definition which the supreme court in commissioner, hindu religious endowments, madras v. sri lakshmindra thirtha swamiar, 1954 scr 1005: (air 1954 3c 282) (e), considered brought out the essential characteristics 'of a tax as distinguished from other forms of imposition.the employer's special contribution under the employees .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1914 (PC)

C. Raghunatha Row Sahib Avergal Vs. Vellamoonji Goukden

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 25Ind.Cas.941

..... nothing similar to section 53 (2). those decisions, therefore, do not seem to be material. i observe, however, that up to 1908, when the estates land act came into force, there was authority for and against claims similar to that of appellant and that those cases, therefore, afford no reason for a decision against him.6. in these ..... is against the importation of that restriction. and finally such importation is, in my opinion, negatived by the fact that exchange of pattah and muchilika is not under the act a necessary preliminary to the institution of a suit, and a provision regarding errors in the former could, therefore, have no effect in connection with one.5. we ..... the decree setting aside the distraint on the ground that it was for an excessive amount. it is contended here with reference to section 53 (2), estates land act, that the amount, in respect of which the distraint was excessive, should have been ascertained and that the distraint should have been set aside in respect of that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 1918 (PC)

Musammat Ajnasi Kuar and ors. Vs. Payag Singh

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1918All264; 45Ind.Cas.534

..... of chapters or descriptions given of sections in the margin of the same. i think this applies with peculiar force to such headings, etc., in an act such as local act no. ii of 1901, which cannot be held to be a model of good drafting. the matter in ..... had been clearly put and clearly met and does not seem to be beyond the provisions of section 156 as they stand in the act. the subject-matter of the suit was land not liable to resumption under section 154 or land to which the provisions of section ..... for an alternative relief, she asked that revenue might be assessed on the plots of land in dispute under section 150/156 of act no. ii of 1901. there can be no doubt that, what the plaintiff intended and aimed at was relief to be granted her ..... under section 156 or section 158 of act no. ii of 1901. in the written statement the defendant, as his written statement shows, fully realized this and contended that he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1921 (PC)

Kalka Das Vs. Gajju Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1921All13; (1921)ILR43All510; 62Ind.Cas.897

..... of civil procedure, section 341(e) and chapter xx (sections 344 to 360a). clause 2 of section 56 of act iii of 1907 goes on to say that where in any enactment in force at the date of the commencement of this act reference is made to chapter xx of the code of civil procedure, 1877, or of the code of civil procedure ..... xxxiii, xxxix, xl, xliii and xliv of the code of civil procedure shall not apply to any such suit or proceeding.5. the code of civil procedure then in force was act xiv of 1882. the provincial law of insolvency when the tenancy act was enacted was embodied in chapter xx of the code of civil procedure. section 193(a) of the tenancy ..... arrears of rent against a tenant declared an insolvent, and as against whom such declaration was in full force and effect at the date of the suit, was not maintainable.3. that decision was based on section 16(2) of the provincial insolvency act and the learned judges say that that section expressly provides that save as therein provided no suit shall .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 1923 (PC)

Jokhu Rai and ors. Vs. Bhabhuti Rai and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1923All559; 77Ind.Cas.760

..... there has been no formal partiti on carried out under the provisions of chapter vii of the land revenue act; but a phatbandi of this kind which has been in force for over forty years (the wajib-ul-arz is dated 1881) is quite sufficient to entitle the ..... the trial court is formally recorded in the wajib-ul-arz which says:each co-sharer by a verbal phatbandi which is in force for a long time collects rent of his own share separately from the tenants.' when the learned judge says that there has been ..... dismissed the suit mainly on the ground that in his opinion the plaintiffs alone were not entitled to sue under section 194 of the tenancy act. he also holds, however; that the defendants took possession of the land as co-sharers. if this latter finding is ore of ..... an appeal by the plaintiffs in a suit for ejectment of non-occupancy tenants under sections 58 and 63 of the tenancy act. the suit was decreed by the trial court but has been dismissed by the lower appellate court. it is common ground .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1925 (PC)

Chunni Lal and ors. Vs. Sheo Charan Lal Lalman and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1925All787

..... the valuation by the plaintiff in his plaint and by the defendant in appeal ought to be the same where the subject-matter in dispute is identical has certainly some force. after all it is the plaintiff who puts forward a claim, whether it is a true one, a false one or an exaggerated one. the subject-matter in dispute is ..... not kept pace with the amendments of the code of civil procedure. in 1870, when the court-fees act was passed, act no. viii of 1859 as amended by the act of 1860 was in force. under those acts there was no such thing as a preliminary decree distinct and separate from a final decree. thus although in a suit disputes might arise as regards ..... itself that some of the sections at any rate do so apply; and of course, the headings have no binding force in interpreting the sections. the case is admittedly governed by section 7, sub-section 4, clause (f) of the court-fees act. that section runs as follows, so far as is material for the present purposes:the amount of fee payable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1936 (PC)

Ram Ghulam Vs. Bandhu Singh

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1936All434; 163Ind.Cas.564

..... had no existence as an agriculturist in so far as this transaction is concerned because the money was not advanced to. him. this argument has in my opinion no force. we cannot go beyond the plain meaning of the section. bandhu singh claims to be an agriculturist for the purposes of section 5 and therefore all that can be ..... shall not exceed four years.5. there may be one further difficulty in applying a meaning to the term decree in the proviso to section 3(1) of the act. the act says that the period of such instalments shall not extend beyond four years from the date of the decree. section 3 refers to those cases in which an instalment ..... 1935 and then bandhu singh put in an application that the decree might be converted into a decree for payment by instalments under the provisions of section 5, agriculturists' belief act. the learned munsif accepted his contention, reduced the interest and directed that payment should be made by annual instalments of rs. 150.2. two points are raised by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 1939 (PC)

Magan Behari Lal Vs. Ram Partap Singh

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1939All535

..... , which shall come into force on 1st october 1933.8. now, section 69 in sub-section (1) refers to a right arising from contract or conferred by the act and provides that no person can sue as a partner against the ..... impose some penalty for want of registration. the act provided a period of one year after the passing of the act during which the public could take measures for the registration of firms, and it was only after the expiry of that year that these penal provisions for unregistered firms came into force. this is provided in section 1(3) which ..... states:it shall come into force on 1st october 1932, except section 69 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 1948 (PC)

Ram Bharosey and ors. Vs. Bishwanath Rao Peshwa

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1948All301

..... support of the view i have expressed above. the first case is in seshayyanagar v. jaimulavadin ('81) 3 mad. 66. it was decided in 1880 when civil procedure code, act x of 1877, was in force. its provisions were similar to the provisions of the earlier civil procedure code of 1859. it is observed:we are not prepared to follow the ruling cited in nusseroodddeen biswas ..... is one reported in nusseroodddeen biswas v. ujjul biswas ('72) 17 w.r. 68. it was a case decided with reference to the provisions of the civil procedure code, act 8 (viil) of 1859 then in force. section 376 in chap, ix, civil p.c., was:any party to a suit who may be unable to pay for the stamps required for the prosecution .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //