Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: us supreme court Page 11 of about 4,998 results (0.245 seconds)

May 15 1959 (SC)

Guest, Keen, Williams Private Ltd. Vs. P.J. Sterling and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1959SC1279; (1959)IILLJ405SC; [1960]1SCR348

..... labour appellate tribunal was incompetent and should not have been entertained by it. under s. 7(1)(a) of the industrial disputes (appellate tribunal) act, 1950 (48 of 1950), an appeal lies to the appellate tribunal from any award or decision of an industrial tribunal inter alia if the appeal involves any substantial question of ..... engineering products. it has a factory at howrah where about 5000 workmen are employed. 3. after the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946 (act 20 of 1946) (hereafter called the act) came into force on april 23, 1946, the appellant submitted its draft standing orders for certification to the certifying officer. on december 19, 1953, ..... of the reference is unsound. 12. it is relevant at this stage to consider the scheme and effect of the relevant provisions of the act. the act came into force on april 23, 1946, and it was intended to require employers in industrial establishments to define with sufficient precision the conditions of employment under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1967 (SC)

Chief Mining Engineer East India Coal Co. Ltd. Vs. Rameswar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC218; [1967(15)FLR457]; 1968LabIC197; (1968)ILLJ6SC; [1968]1SCR140

..... under s. 33c; (3) section 33c which is in terms similar to those in s. 20 of the industrial disputes (appellate tribunal) act, 1950 is a provision in the nature of an executing provision; (4) section 33c(1) applies to cases where money is due to a ..... s right rests. (6) the fact that the words of limitation used in s. 20(2) of the industrial disputes (appellate tribunal) act, 1950 are omitted in s. 33c(2) shows that the scope of s. 33c(2) is wider than that of s. 33c(1). ..... they would at best be entitled to bonus for the period during which they were so employed. this contention has, however, no force in view of the company not having disputed the quantum of relief claimed by the workmen both as regards bonus as also the ..... , recognised the need of individual workmen of a speedy remedy to enforce their existing individual rights and therefore inserted s. 33a in 1950 and s. 33c in 1956. these two sections illustrate cases in which individual workmen can enforce their rights without having to take .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 1967 (SC)

Pritam Singh Chahil Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC930; (1967)69PLR405; [1967]2SCR536

..... against the petitioner on the question raised by him may be noticed. in that case one of the contentions raised was that the bihar land reforms act, 1950 (xxx of 1950) and other acts were ultra vires the constitution for want of legislative competency, as law made under entry 36 of list ii of the seventh schedule to the ..... or 31, but complains that the state is infringing his fundamental right under article 19 without any valid law to support its action. so stated there is considerable force in the argument. but the whole edifice would be brought down if the rules prescribing the compensation are valid, for, in that event, the petitioner's fundamental ..... in the aggregate the permissible limits.' section 32-e provides : 'notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law, custom or usage for the time being in force, and subject to the provisions of chapter iv, after the date on which the final statement in respect of a landowner or tenant is published in the official gazette .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1975 (SC)

The State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. the Salvation Army, Western Indi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC846; (1975)1SCC509; [1975]3SCR475

..... licence to carry on its activities without suffixing the word 'limited' after its name. it is also registered under the bombay public trusts act, 1950 (hereinafter called the 'act') and carries on various charitable activities. the company has its headquarters in bombay. the funds of the company are administered under the articles ..... this judgment that this appeal has been filed on the basis of certificate granted by the high court.4. the act was brought into force from 14-8-1950. the object of the act is to regulate and make better provision for the administration of public religious and charitable trusts in the state of bombay ..... . section 57(1) states that there shall be established a fund to be called the public trusts administration fund and that the fund shall vest in the charity commissioner appointed under the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 1998 (SC)

Union of India and ors. Vs. Subedar Ram Narain

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC3225; JT1998(6)SC383; 1998LabIC3530; (1999)ILLJ77SC; 1998(5)SCALE278; (1998)8SCC52; [1998]Supp1SCR616

..... close arrest with effect from 17.11.1988 and was then court-martialed under the provisions of the army act. he was charged under section 40(a), using criminal force to his superior officer, and section 48 of the army act, 1950 for being in a state of intoxication while on duty.3. the general court martial found the respondent ..... regulation 16(a) are clearly different from regulation 113(a). according to regulation 16(a) when an officer, as defined in section 3(xviii) of the army act, 1950, is cashiered or dismissed or removed from service then the president has the discretion of either forfeiting his pension or ordering that he be granted pension at a lesser ..... whether the respondent who was junior commissioned officer, would be ineligible for pension or gratuity in respect of all his previous service on his being dismissed under the army act, 1950.2. the respondent was enrolled in the indian army on 17.03.1962. he was promoted to the rank of subedar major with effect from 1st march, 1984 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2007 (SC)

Boddam Narsimha Vs. Hasan Ali Khan (Dead) by L.R. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC1145; 2007(3)ALT50(SC); JT2007(2)SC629; 2007(2)SCALE274; 2007AIRSCW1150

..... dated 23.11.1959 in favour of bala stood executed after the vendor hamid ali khan obtained permission under sections 47 and 48 of the hyderabad tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950. the permission was obtained from deputy collector on 13.11.1959. accordingly, bala became a pattedar in place of hamid ali khan in respect of the suit land. ..... lapse of more than 40 years. no explanation was given in the application by the appellant for not invoking section 37-a for almost 40 years. the tenancy act came into force on 10.6.1950. at this point it may be stated that the appellant herein is not the l.r. of bala. the appellant is the nephew of bala, however, ..... p. (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950 ('the act') as amended from time to time. in other words, the appellant herein invoked the said act for the first time on 16.12.1998 though section 37-a stood incorporated in the tenancy law by way of an (amendment) act, 1955, which came into force on 12.3.1956.4. bala was the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2004 (SC)

Sopan Sukhdeo Sable and ors. Vs. Assistant Charity Commissioner and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC1801; 2004(2)ALD115(SC); 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)360; 2004(2)AWC1505(SC); (SCSuppl)2004(2)CHN152; 2004(2)SCALE82; (2004)3SCC137; 2004(2)LC817(SC)

..... rule 11 of the code. with reference to section 80 of the bombay public trusts act, 1950 (in short the 'act') it was urged that no civil court had jurisdiction to decide or deal with any question which by or under the ..... by due process of law, has been laid down in several cases. it was so held by this court in yashwant singh v. jagdish singh air 1968 sc 620 krishna ram mohate v. mrs. shobha venkata rao, : air1989sc2097 , ram rattan v. state of u.p. : 1977crilj433 , and ..... hands. they had tried to get relief from the high court by filing a petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, 1950 (in short the 'constitution'). they failed to comply with the interim directions given by the high court and before the date posted ..... , the term of tenancy are matters intermittently linked with these basic issues. such issues cannot be decided by the authorities under the act. therefore, the rejection of the plaint under order vii rule 11 of the code cannot be maintained in law. the plaintiffs were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 1973 (SC)

Abdul Sathar Haji Moosa Sait Dharmastapanam Vs. Commissioner of Agricu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC1795; [1973]91ITR5(SC); (1974)3SCC257

..... haji moosa by his will dated 25th day of kanni, 1099 m. e. is a public charitable trust within the meaning of section 4(b) of kerala agricultural income-tax act, 1950. the high court came to the conclusion that half of the income of the properties mentioned in schedule b to the will as well as l/4th of the income .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1960 (SC)

The Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Khalil-ul-rahman and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC143; [1961]1SCR564

..... a certificate which was granted; and that is how appeal no. 196 has come to this court. in the meantime, u. p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950 (u. p. i of 1951), (hereinafter called the act) came into force on july 1, 1953. the company thereupon instituted proceedings to recover actual possession of the land under s. 232 of the ..... act read with ss. 12 and 20 thereof. the sub-divisional officer decided in january 1954 in favour of the company and ordered delivery of possession to it ..... in 1356 f, its possession was not on its own behalf but on behalf of the landlords, whose thekadar it was. we are of opinion that there is no force in either of these contentions. so far as the first contention is concerned, all that had happened after november 3, 1948, is that the company got stay orders from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 1998 (SC)

Saiyad Mohammad Bakar El-edroos (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Abdulhabib Hasan Ar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)257; AIR1998SC1624; 1998(4)ALLMR(SC)82; (1998)2GLR1781; JT1998(3)SC76; (1998)IIIMLJ141(SC); 1998(2)SCALE621; (1998)4SCC343; [1998]2SCR648

..... having interest in the public trust make an application before him, in writing, in the prescribed manner. we find, the object of the aforesaid bombay public trust act, 1950 as revealed through its preamble is to regulate and make better provisions of the administration of public religious and charitable trust within the state of maharashtra. the charity commissioner ..... to the procedure or practice of the small cause court on or before the thirty-first day of december, 1894, in or under this act or any other enactment for the time being in force; and(a) empower the registrar to hear and dispose of undefended suits and interlocutory applications or matters, and(b) cancel or vary any ..... for the exercise by one or more of the judges of the small cause court of any powers conferred on the small cause court by this act or any other enactment for the time being in force.(2) the law, and any rules and declarations made, or purporting to be made, thereunder, with respect to procedure or practice, in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //