Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: us supreme court Page 1 of about 4,998 results (0.165 seconds)

Office Of The Odisha Lokayukta Vs. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in respect of whom the jurisdiction is exercisable by any court or other authority under the army act, 1950, the air force act, 1950, the navy act, 1957 and the coast guard act, 1978 or the procedure is applicable to such public servant under those acts; 10 . .18. chapter vii prescribes the procedure in respect of preliminary inquiry and investigation ..... upon the lokayukta to afford an opportunity of hearing to the public servant as referred to under sections 20(2) and 20(3) of the act, 2014. a complete inbuilt procedure has been prescribed under chapter vii for conducting preliminary inquiry and investigation within the powers of the lokayukta. chapter viii ..... after taking into consideration the contents of the complaint and the supporting documents annexed thereto, in exercise of power conferred under section 20(1) of the act, 2014 directed the directorate of vigilance, odisha, cuttack to conduct a preliminary inquiry against respondent no.1 and submit a report within two months with .....

Mclucas Vs. Dechamplain

Court : US Supreme Court

..... s. 34 . mr. justice powell delivered the opinion of the court. the district court for the district of columbia preliminarily enjoined appellants, the secretary of the air force and five air force officers, [ footnote 1 ] from proceeding with page 421 u. s. 23 appellee dechamplain's court-martial (i) on charges based upon art. 134 of ..... as allowing a direct appeal from an injunctive order erroneously entered by a single district judge, and instead appeal should be allowed only when the district court acted within its jurisdiction. [ footnote 11 ] such a gloss on 1252 perhaps would be "consonant with the overriding policy, historically encouraged by congress, of minimizing ..... 363 u. s. 603 (1960). [ footnote 12 ] we follow these cases and hold that, whether the district court did or did not have jurisdiction to act, this case is properly here under 1252. iii proper disposition of the case does not require extended discussion. appellants argue that, in fact, dechamplain's constitutional claim .....

Sizemore Vs. Brady

Court : US Supreme Court

..... distributing what remained, for issuing deeds transferring the title to the allotted lands to the several allottees, and for ultimately terminating the tribal relation. in 28, this act directed that the enrollment, except as to children, should include "all citizens who were living" on april 1, 1899, and entitled to enrollment under the earlier ..... the act of june 30, 1902, 32 stat. 500, c. 1323, called the "supplemental creek agreement," which went into ..... which also provided: "and the descent and distribution of lands and moneys provided for in said act [march 1, 1901] shall be in accordance with the provisions of chapter forty-nine of mansfield's digest of the statutes of arkansas in force in indian territory." this was repeated, with a qualification not material here, in 6 of .....

Houck Vs. Little River Drainage Dist.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... prescribed rate, and it not being necessary to base such a tax upon special benefits. the statute of missouri authorizing the imposition of the tax being in force prior to the formation of the taxing district, the tax cannot be considered as retrospective and violative of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment on that ..... paying its preliminary expenses. the district was organized in 1907 under the provisions of article 3, chapter 122, revised statutes of missouri, 1899, as amended by the act of april 8, 1905. its board of supervisors appointed engineers, who made surveys and recommended a plan of drainage. upon the adoption of this plan, in november, ..... organized, it had the same footing as if it had been created by the legislature directly, and if the legislature could have established this district by direct act, and then constitutionally imposed upon the lands within the district the ratable tax in question to pay the expenses of organization and for preliminary work, it cannot .....

Ex Parte Young

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and a proper allowance for the property employed, and, for those reasons, that question had not been considered; but inasmuch as the rates fixed by the act of april 18, 1907, had not gone into force, the court observed: "it seems to me, upon this evidence of the conditions before either of those new rates were put into effect (that is ..... unconstitutional and void. the bill also contained an averment that, if the railway company should fail to continue to observe and keep in force, or to observe and put in force, the orders of the commission and the acts of april 4, 1907, and april 18, 1907, such failure might result in an action against the company or criminal proceedings against ..... , the order of the commission of september, 1906, or the act of april 4, 1907) and the reductions made by those rates, that, if there is .....

Smith Vs. Cahoon

Court : US Supreme Court

..... arbitrary, and constituted a violation of the appellant's constitutional right. "such a classification is not based on anything having relation to the purpose for which it is made." air-way electric appliance corp. v. day, 266 u. s. 71 , 266 u. s. 85 ; connolly v. union sewer pipe co., 184 u. s. 540 ..... the state railroad commission, of "auto transportation companies." these companies are thus defined in 1(h): "the term 'auto transportation company,' when used in this act, means every corporation or person, their lessees, trustees or receivers, owning, controlling, operating or managing any motor propelled vehicle not usually operated on or over rails ..... person or corporation operating said freight carrying vehicle. . . . the said bonds shall be conditioned to indemnify passengers and the public receiving personal injuries by any act of negligence, and for damages to property of any person other than the assured, and such bonds shall contain such conditions, provisions, and limitations as the .....

Dan’s City Used Cars, Inc. Vs. Pelkey

Court : US Supreme Court

..... faaaa 601(a), 108stat. 1605 (emphasis added). the target at which it aimed was a state s direct substitution of its own governmental commands for competitive market forces in determining (to a signifi- cant degree) the services that motor carriers will pro- vide. rowe, 552 u. s., at 372 (internal quotation marks omitted ..... in full accord with congress purpose in enacting 14501(c)(1), which was to displace a state s direct substitution of its own governmental commands for competitive market forces in determining . . . the services that motor carriers will provide. id., at 372. the new hampshire prescriptions pelkey invokes hardly constrain participation in interstate ..... . s. c. 41713(b)(1), prohibiting states from enacting or enforcing any law related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier. two years later, the motor carrier act of 1980, 94 stat. 793, extended deregulation to the trucking industry. congress completed the deregulation 14 years thereafter, in 1994, by expressly .....

County of Wilson Vs. National Bank

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , it is not essential that it should in terms be payable to bearer or order. any other equivalent expressions demonstrating the intention to make it negotiable will be of equal force and validity. com.dig., merchant, f. 5; 3 kent, com., lect. 44, p. 77; chitty, bills, c. 5, p. 180 (8th ed.); bayley, bills, 120 (5th ed.); ..... interest payable semiannually, and upon said application being made in writing the county courts and corporate authorities shall cause an election to be held under the laws now in force regulating elections for county and corporate officers, first causing thirty days' notice of the day of such election, the amount of stock to be subscribed, for what ..... sec. 35 declared "that the provisions of chapter 3, article 3, of the code [of tennessee] shall be in force, and said company shall have the benefit of the same except so far as modified or changed by this act. " page 103 u. s. 772 these provisions were by sec. 40 extended to the tennessee and pacific railroad company. .....

R (on the Application of Gc) (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. the Commissioner of ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... november 2009 and receiving royal assent on 8 april 2010. following a change of government in may 2010, however, rather than bringing the crime and security act into force, the incoming government instead announced its proposal for new legislation designed essentially to mirror the scottish system and this finally, by the protection of freedoms bill 2011 ..... to ask whether realistically it could be construed for all the world as if, in enacting it, the government was leaving it to individual police forces or even to acpo acting on their joint behalf to decide upon just what sort of scheme should be implemented for the future retention of biometric data. is it ..... they have fulfilled the purpose for which they were taken." section 64(1a) of pace was enacted by section 82 of the criminal justice and police act 2001. it is still in force. it provides: "(1a) where(a) fingerprints, impressions of footwear or samples are taken from a person in connection with the investigation of an offence .....

Union of India and Others Vs. Corporal A.K. Bakshi and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996IIAD(SC)422; AIR1996SC1368; JT1996(3)SC310; 1996(2)SCALE394; (1996)3SCC65; [1996]2SCR986; 1996(1)LC705(SC); (1996)2UPLBEC1273

..... referred to as 'the policy for discharge'] amounts to removal by way of punishment falling under rule 18 of the air force rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules').2. the air force act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to 'the act'), in chapter iv, makes provisions for conditions of service of every person subject to the ..... act. section 18 prescribes that the every person subject to the act shall hold office during the pleasure of the president. section 19 ..... of discharge tocompetent authority authorisedspecial instructionspersons enrolled under the act who have been arrested.(a)xxx .xxxxx(b)xxxxxxxx(c)xxxxxxxx(d)xxxxx..xxx(e)xxxxxxx(f)xxxxxxxx(g)his services no longer required.(i)xxxxxxxx(ii)unsuitable for retention in the air force.air officer i/c administration3. rule 16 deals with .....