Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 7,983 results (0.490 seconds)

Office Of The Odisha Lokayukta Vs. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in respect of whom the jurisdiction is exercisable by any court or other authority under the army act, 1950, the air force act, 1950, the navy act, 1957 and the coast guard act, 1978 or the procedure is applicable to such public servant under those acts; 10 . .18. chapter vii prescribes the procedure in respect of preliminary inquiry and investigation ..... upon the lokayukta to afford an opportunity of hearing to the public servant as referred to under sections 20(2) and 20(3) of the act, 2014. a complete inbuilt procedure has been prescribed under chapter vii for conducting preliminary inquiry and investigation within the powers of the lokayukta. chapter viii ..... after taking into consideration the contents of the complaint and the supporting documents annexed thereto, in exercise of power conferred under section 20(1) of the act, 2014 directed the directorate of vigilance, odisha, cuttack to conduct a preliminary inquiry against respondent no.1 and submit a report within two months with .....

State Of A.p. Vs. A.p.state Wakf Board .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... government headed by mr. m.k. vellodi and an act known as hyderabad tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950 was passed. this act was described by some economists and policymakers as having taken the lead in land reforms in independent india .15. the abolition regulation came into force on 15.8.1949 when it was published in the ..... thus, the aboli- tion regulation and the commutation regulation are statutory, having been issued under the farman of the sovereign before the constitution came into force on 26.1.1950.11. a constitution bench of this court in a judgment reported as sikander jehan begum v. a.p. state govt.12 held that military governor ..... down in the judicial decisions. the principles deducible from the various judicial decisions considered by this court in khushaldas s. advani [air1950sc222:1950. scr621 at p. 725 (of scr) : (at p. 260 of air) were thus formulated .143. this court in a judgment reported at kranti associates held as under: 47. summarising the above discussion, .....

L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC1125; 1997(1)BLJR735; (1997)1CALLT55(SC); 83(1997)CLT815(SC); 1997(92)ELT318(SC); [1997]228ITR725(SC); JT1997(3)SC589; 1997(1)MPLJ621; 1997(I)OLR(SC)408; 1997(3)SC

..... or post, no court except-- (a) the supreme court; or (b) any industrial tribunal, labour court or other authority constituted under the industrial disputes act, 1947 or any other corresponding law for the time being in force, shall have, or be entitled to exercise any jurisdiction, powers or authority in relation to such recruitment or matters concerning such recruitment or such service ..... an effective substitute and, to that end, suggested several amendments to the provisions governing the form and content of the tribunal. the suggested amendments were given the force of law by an amending act (act 51 of 1987) after the conclusion of the case and the act has since remained unaltered. 10. we may now analyse the scheme and the salient features of the .....

Ksl and Industries Ltd. Vs. Arihant Threads Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : IV(2008)BC421(SC); 153(2008)DLT27(SC); 2008(12)SCALE42; (2008)9SCC763

..... by the central government or by a local authority. the conferment of the right was 'notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this act or in any other law for the time being in force'. section 25b laid down special procedure for enforcement of right conferred by section 14a. section 25a stated that the provisions ..... thereunder shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force whereas section 32(1) of the 1985 act also provides that the provisions of the said act and of any rules or schemes made thereunder shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any ..... beginning with non-obstante clause ('notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained therein in any other law for the time being in force'') must be enforced and implemented by giving effect to the provisions of the act and by limiting the provisions of other laws. but, it cannot be gainsaid that sometimes one may come across .....

Lilawati H. Hiranandani Vs. Usha Tandon

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1996SC441; JT1995(7)SC386; 1995(6)SCALE115; 1995Supp(4)SCC158; [1995]Supp4SCR505

..... should go into difficult questions of title. the said decision was rendered before the amendment inserted by maharashtra amendment act (act 41 of 1963) whereby section 42a was brought into force from 1.1.1964. section 42a of the act mandates that if in an application (filed under section 41) pending in the small cause court, the occupant ..... first respondent and the licence granted to the appellant also came to an end: the appellant-licensee obstructed when the second respondent landlord initiated execution. on 13.9.1950, the appellant and second respondent- landlord came to an agreement wherein the appellant was recognised as a tenant. thereafter, the first respondent - subtenant filed an ..... not determined.7. the appellant's counsel placed considerable reliance on the decision of the bombay high court in k.m. motwani v. albert sequeira and anr. air (1960) bom 18 to contend that the title of the original applicant was determined when she became a part-owner of the society. in that case, .....

Srinivasa Rice Mill Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR233]; JT2006(10)SC305; 2006(11)SCALE694; 2006(2)LC1485(SC)

..... establishment or any person engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the apprentices act, 1961 (52 of 1961), or under the standing orders of the establishment; but does not include- (a) any member of the indian naval, military or air forces; or(b) any person so employed whose wages (excluding remuneration for overtime work) exceed rs ..... only possible answer to the question why this phrase was used is that it was intended to apply upon the date upon which the act came into force. the act when it came into force was intended to apply to those factories in which 10 or more persons were employed on that day or had been employed on any ..... against them is void ab initio. (iii) having regard to the provisions contained in regulation 10b of the employees' state insurance (general) regulations, 1950 (for short 'the regulations') framed under the act, it was obligatory on the part of the inspector to disclose the details of the employees as also the wages drawn by them and the .....

Transport Corporation of India Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corpn. a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC238; JT1999(9)SC12; (2000)ILLJ1SC; (2000)1MLJ128(SC); 2000(2)MPHT295; 1999(7)SCALE63; (2000)1SCC332; [1999]Supp4SCR393; 2000(1)LC287(SC); (2000)1UPLBEC1

..... materials for or distribution or sale of the products of the factory or establishment; but does not include:(a) any member of the indian naval, military or air force, or(b) any person so employed whose wages (excluding remuneration for over-time work) exceeds one thousand six hundred rupees a month.regulation 26 deals with ..... its power under section 97 of the act. the terms 'employer' and 'employer's code number' are defined by sections 2(g) and (h) of the regulation ..... working in factories and establishments covered by the sweep of the act. apart from the scheme of the act and the relevant statutory provisions of the act to which we have referred to until now, we may also turn to the employees' state insurance (general) regulations, 1950 framed by the employees' state insurance corporation in exercise of .....

Ahuja Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3519; JT2003(3)SC566; 2003(3)SCALE623; (2003)5SCC365; [2003]3SCR351

..... of proprietary rights to the prescribed officer of the village within three months of the acquisition of the said right and the said section 1(3) bringing into force chapter vii of the act was issued on 20th october, 1997 (published in the gazette on 30th october, 1997) was post facto to the date of preliminary notification and therefore, the ..... view of the mandate of section 27, the acquisition proceedings under section 28 could only be initiated after 'chapter vii comes into force' which can only be by way of a notification under section 1(3) of the act. in this case the notification under section 1(3) being subsequent to the date of the notification under section 28(1) ..... prepared on 3rd october, 1997 (published in the gazette on 30th october, 1997), the notification under section 1(3) bringing into force chapter vii of the act was issued on 20th october, 1997 (published in the gazette on 30th october, 1997) was post facto to the date of preliminary notification and therefore, the entire .....

S.B.P. and Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC450; 2006(1)ALD10(SC); 2005(3)ARBLR285(SC); 2006(1)AWC538(SC); 2006(1)BomCR585; [2005]128CompCas465(SC); (2006)2CompLJ7(SC); 2005(5)CTC302; (2006)3GLR2097; [2006(1

..... intervention. the said section is material and reads thus ;'5. extent of judicial intervention. -notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, in matters governed by this part, no judicial authority shall intervene except where so provided in this part.'chapter ii deals with 'arbitration agreement'. section 7 declares ..... the section, without undue delay. section 5 indicates the extent of judicial intervention. it says that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, in matters governed by part i, no judicial authority shall intervene except where so provided in part i. the expression 'judicial authority' is not defined. so ..... would certainly include the court as defined in section 2(e) of the act and would also, in our opinion, include other courts and may even include a special tribunal like the consumer forum (see fair air engineers (p) ltd. and anr. v. n.k. modi : air1997sc533. when the defendant to an action before a .....

Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui Etc, Mohd. Aslam, Hargyan Singh, Thakur Vijay Ra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1995SC605A

..... maps, plans, drawings and other documents of whatever nature relating thereto.(2) all properties aforesaid which have vested in the central government under section 3 shall, by force of such vesting, be freed and discharged from any trust, obligation, mortgage, charge, lien and all other encumbrances affecting them and any attachment, injunction decree or ..... sovereign power of the state to acquire property. b. k. mukherjee, j. (as he then was) held in chiranjitlal chowdhuri v. union of india : [1950]1scr869 as under:it is a right inherent in every sovereign to take and appropriate private property belonging to individual citizens for public use. this right, which is described ..... , in other words maintains neutrality in matters of religion and provides equal protection to all religions subject to regulation and actively acts on secular part.' (at page 168) (of scc) : (at p. 3085 of air).b. p. jeevan reddy, j. in the same context in the decision stated thus:.while the citizens of this country .....