Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: delhi Page 90 of about 5,616 results (0.093 seconds)

Mar 17 2017 (HC)

Metro Tyres Ltd vs.the Advertising Standards Council of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... section (1), a district court having jurisdiction shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the code of civil procedure, 1908 or any other law for the time being in force, include a district court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction, at the time of the institution of the suit or other proceeding, the person instituting the ..... regulation in advertising will not be carried on cable service; (v) that section 19 and section 2(a) of the cable television networks (regulations) act, 1995 (ctn act) make it clear that power to prohibit such transmission of advertisements in violation of advertisement code vests with an authorised officer who is either a district magistrate ..... the plaintiff, by pursuing this suit cannot prevent its advertising agency and the tv channels and other medium on which the advertisement of the plaintiff is airing from, if chose to abide by recommendation of asci with respect to said advertisement, doing so. however in the event of asci finding merit in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2017 (HC)

Court on Its Own Motion vs.mahender Singh Manan & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... -11-84 / 400 04-11-84 3 07 3.30 149 / 500 re: sc no.page 9 of 85 i 02- 11-84 i , i airforce central account office udc air force air force i (illegible) si 147/ ipc wa - 10 ( illegible) 149 436 / 427 / 302 / re: sc no.page 10 of 85 22- 12- 84 exhibits ( illegible) i si ( illegible) w /o ..... wishfully or pretend to be blissfully ignorant or oblivious to such serious pitfalls or dereliction of duty on the part of the prosecuting agency. the prosecutor who does not act fairly and acts more like a counsel for the defence is a liability to the fair judicial system, and courts could not also play into the hands of such prosecuting agency ..... primary evidence of any document, except in the cases hereinbefore excepted. (emphasis supplied) 31. we have noted above that the code of criminal procedure as well as indian evidence act, 1872 amply empowers the trial court to take action for ensuring the appearance of the witnesses. therefore, the judgment of the trial court dated 17th may, 1986 in sc no .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2017 (HC)

Rajesh Kumar Rai & Ors vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... of the direction issued by the bar council of india. further, the said direction was issued on 23rd august, 2016. however, the rules have been in force from the academic year of 2009-2010. another contention raised by the petitioners is that there are other universities which are offering evening courses in law. the bar ..... number of studies and most experts acknowledge the need to upgrade and improve standard of legal education. this desideratum is not new and was voiced as early as 1950s. more than half a century later, efforts to refine and improve legal education, correct deficiencies and faults to achieve better standards should not be abnegated and spurned ..... for discharging the aforesaid functions; the aforesaid functions have to be read in the light of the statement of objects and reasons for enacting the act i.e. the advocates act, 1961. this enactment was the result of the report of the law commission relating to the reforms in the judicial administration and the recommendations made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2017 (HC)

Narottam Mishra vs.the Election Commission of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... the impugned action is not an adjudication of any dispute but the automatic result flowing from the non- observance of the statutory provisions which stand incorporated in the act of the parliament. therefore, it is not the election commission which has disqualified the petitioner but the petitioner has himself incurred the disqualification under the statute. if ..... the apex court in (2002) 5 scc337a.v.g.p. chettiar & sons vs. t. palanisamy gounder wherein the apex court had quoted with approval a paragraph from air p. 240 trojan & co. vs. rm. n.n. nagappa chettiar wherein the court had held that the decision of a case cannot be based on the ..... question of imposition of any punishment or stigma on the basis of any disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner, as the disqualification contemplated by s.10a of the act is a necessary consequences flowing from the failure of the petitioner himself from lodging the account of election expenses within the stipulated period and in the prescribed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 2017 (HC)

Jai Kumar Arya & Ors. Vs.chhaya Devi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... bars the civil court from entertaining any suit or proceeding, in respect of any matter which the nclt is empowered to determine by or under this act or any other law for time being in force . 68.4 mr. sapra emphatically submits that words is empowered to determine are applicable only in a case where there is a specific statutory empowerment, ..... to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which the tribunal or the appellate tribunal is empowered to determine by or under this act or any other law for the time being in force and no injunction shall be granted by any court or other authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of ..... any power conferred by or under this act or any other law for the time being, in the appellate tribunal. the tribunal or force, by 68.2 parallelly, of course, section 9 of the cpc postulates that the courts shall (subject to the provisions herein .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2017 (HC)

Crossword Entertainment Private Limited vs.central Board of Film Certi ...

Court : Delhi

..... of court and the (xix) national symbols and emblems are not shown except in accordance with the provisions of the emblems and names (prevention of improper use) act, 1950 (12 of 1950). 16. in the present case the board has relied upon guidelines 2(ii)(vi)(vii)(ix)(xii)(xviii) (underlined hereinabove) for denying the certification of the ..... the film depicts that india is going through times of turbulence. the agitation for ram janma bhoomi has started getting momentum and the nationalist parties and nationalist social forces are emerging strongly and successfully on the political and social scene. in this social and political back drop, the film is a unique and interesting story of dharmnath ..... eyes and the ears of a free society. they are the veritable lungs of a free society because the power of their medium imparts a breath of fresh air into the drudgery of daily existence. iii. their right to communicate ideas in a medium of their choosing is as fundamental as the right of any other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2018 (HC)

Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... the police personnel standing nearby did not help. with the help of one santok singh sandhu who was serving in the air force, pw-10 and her family fled to the air force station, palam in an air force vehicle. crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 15 of 203 22. therefore, from the deposition of pw-10, ..... exercise, the central crl.a. 1099/2013 & connected matters page 23 of 203 government set up a one-man commission under the commissions of inquiry act 1952 ( coi act ) comprising justice ranganath misra. the statements recorded by the marwaha committee were to be handed over and examined by the justice ranganath misra commission. but ..... imt) at nuremberg to try nazi criminals accused of mass extermination of jews defined crimes against humanity as: murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war, or prosecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution or in connection with any crime .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2019 (HC)

Abdullah Ali Balsharaf & Anr vs.directorate of Enforcement & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... of the money laundering relating to the kickbacks alleged to have been received by certain parties in connection with the purchase of vvip helicopters by the indian air force (iaf) from m/s agustawestland, uk (augustawestland).32. in the counter affidavit filed by the enforcement directorate, it is stated that cbi has ..... bank and anr.: (2018) 1 scc407 the supreme court had examined the question of repugnancy between two enactments, namely, the maharashtra relief undertakings (special provisions act), 1958 and the insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2016 in the perspective of the constitution of india. the supreme court had referred to various decisions and culled ..... and therefore, there was now no justification in the enforcement directorate withholding the said securities.84. nonetheless, the officers of the enforcement directorate did not act immediately. considering that it is argued that the orders under section 102 cr.p.c. are emergent orders necessary to freeze the properties which are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (HC)

M/S Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd vs.competition Commission o ...

Court : Delhi

..... two parts disjunctive. in union of india vs. rabinder singh, (2012) 12 scc787 while construing similarly placed clause appearing in section 42(f) of the army act, 1950, it was observed thus:-" 25. we accept the submission of shri tripathi that the two parts of section 52(f) are disjunctive, which can also be seen ..... already been carefully considered by the constitution bench in maqbool hussain v. state of bombay, air1953sc325 and we cannot do better than extract the relevant portions therefrom: (air pp. 328-29, paras 7 & 11-12) jeopardy only crl.m.c. 4363/2018 etc. page 20 of 24 7. the fundamental right which is ..... of india ( the commission , for short), a statutory body established by the central government in exercise of its power under section 7 of the competition act, 2002 ( the competition act , for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the petitioners on which the chief metropolitan magistrate (cmm) delhi .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2019 (HC)

Jose C Mundadan vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... two parts disjunctive. in union of india vs. rabinder singh, (2012) 12 scc787 while construing similarly placed clause appearing in section 42(f) of the army act, 1950, it was observed thus:-" 25. we accept the submission of shri tripathi that the two parts of section 52(f) are disjunctive, which can also be seen ..... already been carefully considered by the constitution bench in maqbool hussain v. state of bombay, air1953sc325 and we cannot do better than extract the relevant portions therefrom: (air pp. 328-29, paras 7 & 11-12) jeopardy only crl.m.c. 4363/2018 etc. page 20 of 24 7. the fundamental right which is ..... of india ( the commission , for short), a statutory body established by the central government in exercise of its power under section 7 of the competition act, 2002 ( the competition act , for short), the respondent herein, has instituted, through its authorized representative, criminal complaints against the petitioners on which the chief metropolitan magistrate (cmm) delhi .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //