Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: advocates faculty of Court: delhi Page 10 of about 2,200 results (0.029 seconds)

Jan 28 2000 (HC)

Thakur Dass Virmani and Others Vs. Smt. Raj Minocha and Another

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)20; AIR2000Delhi234; 84(2000)DLT534; 2000(53)DRJ248

..... the witnesses of the appellants, while disposing in favor of the appellants, did not state that the testatrix was suffering from any such serious ailment which might have impaired her mental faculties making her incapable to understand the nature and extent of her disposition. ..... chopra that a material witness, advocate tuteja was not brought in the witness box although he was an independent witness and allegedly drafted the will and got the same registered in the office of the sub-registrar. 3. ..... the other argument of learned counsel for the appellants that the advocate mr. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2015 (HC)

Seema Sapra Vs. General Electric Co. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... of the complaints set out in the present application; (m) issue direct notice on the writ petition once again to respondents 1, 6 and 7 by dasti email and directing these respondents to appear in this matter through properly authorised counsel/advocates and to file their response to the pleadings through a duly authorised signatory duly empowered to sign court pleadings on behalfof these respondents; (n) direct the court registry to return the defective vakalatnamas filed on december 7, 2012 and ..... to subvert and sabotage the present writ petition; (d) issue direct notice on the writ petition once again to respondents 1,6 and 7 by dasti email and directing these respondents to appear in this matter through properly authorised counsel/advocates; (e) direct the court registry to return the defective vakalatnamas filed on december 7,2012 and refilled on december 11,2012 and to also return the defective vakalatnamas filed on december 17,2012 by nanju ganpathy/azb & partners in compliance ..... ) by azb & partners/mr nanju ganpathy are defective and invalid and do not authorise azb & partners/mr nanju ganpathy to appear on behalf of these respondents in this matter; and for directions prohibiting appearance on behalf of respondents16 and7by any advocate (including) the law firm of azb & partners and mr nanju ganpathy) without duly executed vakalatnamas and for issuance of notice of criminal contempt of court to mr nanju ganpathy for committing a fraud on this court with intent to subvert .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2005 (HC)

Educate India Society Vs. All India Council for Technical Education

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 125(2005)DLT151; 2005(85)DRJ271

..... it has been explained that the documents forwarded on 8.9.2005 were merely joining reports of the newly employed faculty, which remedial action had been taken by the petitioner in compliance with the deficiencies pointed out by the respondent. ..... the learned additional advocate general contended that clause 3 of para 7.06 says that the appointment of a district government counsel is only professional engagement terminable at will on either side and not appointment to a post under the government; and the government has ..... succinctly summed up, the respondent had notified that there was a shortfall of 25 teachers in the faculty; the director was over-aged etc. ..... 3 which enables the government to terminate the appointment 'at any time without assigning any cause' can also not be considered in the manner, suggested by the learned additional advocate general. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1994 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. National Engg. India Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1994)(72)ELT588TriDel

..... . if it is so done, the specifications of the steel balls under consideration satisfy the criteria given in the said chapter note.7.5 as against the above reading of the said chapter note 6 of the department of revenue, the assessees' learned advocate wants us to read the chapter note as follows :- (i) "heading 84.82 applies, inter alia, to polished steel balls, the maximum and minimum diameter of which do not differ; (ii) from the nominal diameter; (iii) by more than 1% or by more than 0.05 ..... between the maximum and minimum diameters should be arrived and this should be compared with the nominal diameter of the steel ball to check whether this is within the specifications of 1% or 0.05 mm whichever is less.7.6 so read, the learned advocate contends that the steel balls under consideration do not satisfy the criterion of difference of maximum and minimum diameters from the nominal diameter laid down in chapter note 6 ..... hence the cycle balls do not satisfy note 6 to chapter 84 get.learned advocate also draws attention to the fact that it is clear from the tour report that for the cycle balls lapping operation is not ..... . badri prasad, deputy chief chemist.7.7 learned advocate has submitted that the original authority, namely, assistant collector of central excise, jaipur has arrived at his own findings in interpreting the aforesaid chapter note without taking into account the affidavit of dr. ..... amitabh bhattacharyya, faculty of engineering and technology in jadavpur university .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2007 (HC)

Sh. Surinder Pal Singh and anr. Vs. Sh. Daljit Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(98)DRJ267

..... the other witness in this case was an advocate, who was contacted there and became the attesting witness. ..... he stated that there was another person present in addition to the testator and himself, who might be an advocate and he also signed the will. ..... examination-in-chief) as it was sent to him by the advocate on the other side. ..... harsh vir chauhan, advocate. ..... physical infirmity, if at all (even that is not suggested) has no correlation with the cognitive and mental faculties. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2014 (HC)

Maharaja Agarsen Institute of Technology Vs. Guru Govind Singh Indrapr ...

Court : Delhi

..... laliet kumar, advocate versus guru govind singh indraprastha univesity & ors ..... ..... amitesh kumar, advocate for aicte. ..... ferida satarawala, advocate for govt. ..... vipin singh, advocates for ggsiu. ms. ..... mamta tiwari, advocate for mr. ..... mukul talwar, advocate with mr. ..... sudhir nandrajog, senior advocate with mr. ..... , which is reproduced as under: the ban on the new affiliation during the academic year 2014-15 may be relaxed and affiliation may be granted subject to strict scrutiny of facilities to ensure fulfillment of all norms about infrastructure, staff/faculty etc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs.naincy Sagar & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... semester term end lpa713& 717/2019 page 7 of 26 examination to be held from 28.11.2019, which is being done on a daily basis and if similar directions are to be issued in the fresh petitions, it will be extremely burdensome for the teaching faculty that is having to cope with these extra classes, besides taking their regular classes. ..... during the 8th semester, he had interned for one month between mid january to mid february 2019 with an advocate, who had issued him a certificate. ..... sandeep sethi, learned senior advocate appearing for the respondents/students has supported the impugned judgment and the interpretation given by the learned single judge to clauses 9 and 11.3(v) of ordinance 11. ..... rahul kumar, advocates, for respondent no.2. ..... aseem atwal, advocates, lpa713& 717/2019 page 1 of 26 for respondent no.1. mr. ..... aseem atwal, advocates, for respondent no.1. ..... the bar council of india being the regulatory body, has notified rules of legal education, 2008 (in short, bci rules ) for maintaining standard of legal education and for recognition of degrees in law for enrolment as an advocate. ..... advocate with mr. ..... arun sanwal, advocates. ..... advocate with mr. ..... arun sanwal, advocates. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs.prateek Solanki & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... semester term end lpa713& 717/2019 page 7 of 26 examination to be held from 28.11.2019, which is being done on a daily basis and if similar directions are to be issued in the fresh petitions, it will be extremely burdensome for the teaching faculty that is having to cope with these extra classes, besides taking their regular classes. ..... during the 8th semester, he had interned for one month between mid january to mid february 2019 with an advocate, who had issued him a certificate. ..... sandeep sethi, learned senior advocate appearing for the respondents/students has supported the impugned judgment and the interpretation given by the learned single judge to clauses 9 and 11.3(v) of ordinance 11. ..... rahul kumar, advocates, for respondent no.2. ..... aseem atwal, advocates, lpa713& 717/2019 page 1 of 26 for respondent no.1. mr. ..... aseem atwal, advocates, for respondent no.1. ..... the bar council of india being the regulatory body, has notified rules of legal education, 2008 (in short, bci rules ) for maintaining standard of legal education and for recognition of degrees in law for enrolment as an advocate. ..... advocate with mr. ..... arun sanwal, advocates. ..... advocate with mr. ..... arun sanwal, advocates. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2018 (HC)

Shyama Pahwa vs.narendra Pratap Bhalla & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... she disclosed that she herself told about the facts of this case to her son as well as to her advocate. ..... i had gone through the suit and told my son to give instructions to the advocate. ..... whatever is written in the suit was told by my son to the advocate. ..... i do not consider myself of having proper mental faculty. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2019 (HC)

Chanderprabhu Jain College of Higher Education & School of Law & Anr. ...

Court : Delhi

..... on the contrary the bar council of india has under the rules of legal education, 2008 governing inter alia inspection of universities for recognizing degrees in law, laid down under section 7(1)(h) and 7(1)(i), 24(1) (iii), 49(ag), 49(ad) of the advocates act, 1961 in para 3 of schedule iii, expressly provided as under: what is the adequate space for the said purpose shall be decided by the respective authority of the university under the regulation as guided by the ugc , ( ..... no.1 submits that in the facts of the present case however, it is apparent from a reading of the rules of legal education, 2008 framed under the advocates act, 1961 as referred to herein above, that the primacy in the matter of assessment of space, is given to the norms laid down by the university ..... , the petitioner submits that it has adequate number of classrooms, infrastructure, faculty area and other facilities as are necessary to continue the ba. ll.b. ..... space requirement, indoor and outdoor games facilities and other requirements can be considered sufficient accommodation in compliance with this clause, for the purpose in a multi-faculty institution on land possessed by the management of a society/ trust/ non profit company running multi-faculty institutions in a metropolitan or in a class 1 city ..... that sufficient land and adequate floor space area completely and exclusively devoted for a centre of legal education, based on the size of its student population, faculty requirement infrastructure facilities .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //