Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: advocates faculty of Court: delhi Page 100 of about 2,200 results (0.043 seconds)

Flower Tobacco Company Vs. Ambar Tobacco Company

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2001VAD(Delhi)317; 92(2001)DLT51; 2001(3)RAJ112

..... a.n.menon : air1968ker213 where distinction is drawn between the authority of an agent or of an advocate on the basis of the vakalatnama and it was held that the construction of a document appointing an agent is different form the construction of a vakalat appointing a counsel. ..... learned single judge also held that shri kareer though an advocate had not filed any vakalatnama, but had filed authorization in form tm-48. ..... trade mark agent not being an advocate had exercised his discretion in the facts of the case and finding that there was no force in the opposition, rightly withdrew the opposition, which act could not be challenged by the respondent.10. ..... on 21.5.1981 shri k.c.kareer, trade mark attorney appeared for the opponents and two advocates appeared for the applicant. ..... in the case of an advocate the rule is otherwise because in that case was are dealing with a profession where well-known rules have crystallised through usage.13. ..... two advocates appeared on behalf of the appellant. .....

Maninder Kaur Vs. Delhi High Court and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)969; 57(1995)DLT288; 1994(30)DRJ436; 1994LabIC2373

..... 613 and 2590/90 and the bench grossly erred in directing appointment of respondents 7 to 9 against future vacancies thus depriving the petitioners and other advocates for applying and for being considered for appointment against the said future vacancies. ..... (9) in december 1987 delhi high court once again invited applications from practicing advocates for filling up of four vacancies in the service reserved for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. ..... (1) this judgment will dispose of separate writ petitions filed by five practicing advocates of delhi seeking appointment to the post of additional district and sessions judge (for short 'adj') as members of delhi higher judicial service (for short 'service'). ..... article 233(2) of the constitution of india inter-alia, provides that an advocate becomes eligible for appointment only when the recommendation is made by the high court for appointment. ..... (5) by advertisement issued by the high court in may 1985 applications were invited from practicing advocates possessing the requisite qualifications for direct recruitment as adj's. ..... there were also other advocates at seriall no.4 and 5 of that panel. ..... earlier to their appointment these officers were also practicing advocates at delhi. .....

Pradeep Sharma Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... 793/2004 decided on 10.02.2010.submissions of mr sidharth luthra, senior advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant shri bhagwan sharma 34. ..... sushil kumar, senior advocate, on behalf of the appellant r. k. ..... advocate with mr t.s. ..... advocate with mr sudarshan rajan and md. .....

Union of India and anr. Vs. Central Government Pensioners Association ...

Court : Delhi

..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus central government pensioners association & ors. ..... ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus pps gumber & ors. ..... respondents represented by: mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate coram: hon'ble mr. ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus d.l.vhora & ors. ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus central govt. ..... respondents represented by: mr.nidhesh gupta, sr.advocate with mr.m.k.ghosh and mr.tarun gupta, advocates w.p. ..... respondents mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate w.p. ..... respondents mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate w.p. .....

Union of India and anr. Vs. Central Govt. Sag and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus central government pensioners association & ors. ..... ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus pps gumber & ors. ..... respondents represented by: mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate coram: hon'ble mr. ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus d.l.vhora & ors. ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus central govt. ..... respondents represented by: mr.nidhesh gupta, sr.advocate with mr.m.k.ghosh and mr.tarun gupta, advocates w.p. ..... respondents mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate w.p. ..... respondents mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate w.p. .....

Union of India and anr. Vs. Pps Gumber and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus central government pensioners association & ors. ..... ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus pps gumber & ors. ..... respondents represented by: mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate coram: hon'ble mr. ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus d.l.vhora & ors. ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus central govt. ..... respondents represented by: mr.nidhesh gupta, sr.advocate with mr.m.k.ghosh and mr.tarun gupta, advocates w.p. ..... respondents mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate w.p. ..... respondents mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate w.p. .....

Union of India and anr. Vs. D.L.Vhora and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus central government pensioners association & ors. ..... ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus pps gumber & ors. ..... respondents represented by: mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate coram: hon'ble mr. ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus d.l.vhora & ors. ..... represented by: .....petitioners mr.rajeeve mehra, asg with mr.ruchir mishra and mr.ashish virmani, advocates versus central govt. ..... respondents represented by: mr.nidhesh gupta, sr.advocate with mr.m.k.ghosh and mr.tarun gupta, advocates w.p. ..... respondents mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate w.p. ..... respondents mr.sushil kumar malik, advocate w.p. .....

Mmtc Limited Vs. Employees Provident Fund Organisation

Court : Delhi

..... keshav mohan, advocate for epfo. mr. k.k. ..... amrita prakash, advocates for respondent no. ..... keshav mohan, advocate for epfo. mr. k.k. ..... amrita prakash, advocates for respondent no. ..... keshav mohan, advocate for epfo. mr. k.k. ..... amrita prakash, advocates for respondent no. ..... rana, advocates versus employees provident fund organisation ..... ..... advocates rana, versus employees provident fund organisation ..... ..... advocates rana, versus employees provident fund organisation through: ..... .....

Mmtc Limited Vs. Employees Provident Fund Organisation

Court : Delhi

..... keshav mohan, advocate for epfo. mr. k.k. ..... amrita prakash, advocates for respondent no. ..... keshav mohan, advocate for epfo. mr. k.k. ..... amrita prakash, advocates for respondent no. ..... keshav mohan, advocate for epfo. mr. k.k. ..... amrita prakash, advocates for respondent no. ..... rana, advocates versus employees provident fund organisation ..... ..... advocates rana, versus employees provident fund organisation ..... ..... advocates rana, versus employees provident fund organisation through: ..... .....

Mmtc Limited Vs. Employees Provident Fund Organisation

Court : Delhi

..... keshav mohan, advocate for epfo. mr. k.k. ..... amrita prakash, advocates for respondent no. ..... keshav mohan, advocate for epfo. mr. k.k. ..... amrita prakash, advocates for respondent no. ..... keshav mohan, advocate for epfo. mr. k.k. ..... amrita prakash, advocates for respondent no. ..... rana, advocates versus employees provident fund organisation ..... ..... advocates rana, versus employees provident fund organisation ..... ..... advocates rana, versus employees provident fund organisation through: ..... .....