Court : Delhi
Reported in : AIR2002Delhi440
..... in terms of the aforesaid observations and directions all the writ petitions stand disposed of holding that the full time law teachers of the law faculty of the delhi university could not have enrolled themselves as advocates and, thereforee, enrollment given to the said teachers by the state bar council was per so void and illegal and any action taken by the bar council of india to rectify the said mistake in ..... writ petitions is as to whether or not a faculty member in the faculty of law of the university of delhi could subsequently enrol himself as an advocate and appear in a court of law and simultaneously carry on the duties of afull time faculty member of the faculty of law of the university of delhi.another ancillary issue, which also was argued in these writ petitions is whether or not anenrolled advocate could apply for and be given a faculty position in the faculty of law of theuniversity of delhi after the concerned ..... in the writ petition filed by way of public interest litigationare/were all full time faculty members of the university of delhi, who are/were employed as fulltime faculty members in the university of delhi and have subsequently enrolled themselves as advocates through the delhi state bar council.5. ..... other two writ petitions were appointed as faculty members of thefaculty of law in the university of delhi and continued to be employed as full time facultymembers when subsequently they enrolled themselves as advocates through the delhi state bar council.6. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... because the 7th admission list was published on the cut-off date, prescribed in the information bulletin, the university, it appears, deemed it fit to defer the admission process to 05-06.09.2019 across all faculties, departments, and colleges running under its aegis subject to the candidates fulfilling the following attributes. i. ..... in order to redress the grievances received by the admission office, it is hereby resolved to process the admissions on 05th and 06th september, 2019 in the respective faculties, departments and colleges for those postgraduate applicants whose names appeared w.p. ..... naushad alam, advocate, who, appeared on behalf of the petitioners, contended that discrepancies, if any, which were pointed out qua the petitioners stood removed by 05-06.09.2019 and, therefore, there was no good reason to deny admission to them in the ll.b. ..... rupal, advocate. ..... ..... versus university of delhi, faculty of law through registrar through mr. ..... jitendra bharti, advocates. ..... the faculty of law could not extend further time to produce documents to the petitioners as the last date of admission was 31.08.2019 and only fees was allowed to bew [sic: be]. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... keeping in view the fact that the claimant shri amitava acharjee is an advocate by profession, in my opinion, the faculty of hearing would be important for discharge of his professional duties. ..... appellant through mr.a.k.mishra, mr.hemant , mr.n.k.beniwal and mr.ashok mahipal, advocates alongwith appellant in person versus kulwant singh & ors ..... ..... through mr.a.k.mishra, mr.hemant , mr.n.k.beniwal and mr.ashok mahipal, advocates alongwith amitava chatterjee in person mac.app. ..... respondent through mr.a.k.mishra, mr.hemant , mr.n.k.beniwal and mr.ashok mahipal, advocates alongwith amitava chatterjee in person mac.app. ..... respondent through mr.a.k.mishra, mr.hemant , mr.n.k.beniwal and mr.ashok mahipal, advocates alongwith mr.amitava chatterjee in person + mac.app. ..... respondent through mr.pankaj seth, advocate for the insurance company mac. ..... appellant through mr.pankaj seth, advocate versus shri amitava acharjee and ors ..... through + + + mr.pankaj seth, advocate versus shri amitava acharjee and ors..... ..... appellant through mr.pankaj seth, advocate versus ms anuradha acharjee and ors ..... he has stated that he is an advocate by profession and was earning rs.3,19,853/- per annum and because of the accident he remained in bed for three months and had to follow up for treatment for about two ..... mr.a.k.mishra, mr.hemant , mr.n.k.beniwal and mr.ashok mahipal, advocates alongwith appellant in person ..... ..... mr.a.k.mishra, mr.hemant , mr.n.k.beniwal and mr.ashok mahipal, advocates with appellant in person ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : AIR1993Delhi118; ILR1993Delhi216
..... how can we thus believe this version (18) it was argued that since 1440 booklets had been supplied to the faculty of arts centre out of which 1054 used booklets and 385 unused booklets had been received back leaving one booklet unaccounted for and since it was only in room number 30 that a booklet was stated to ..... jain nor the other advocates and staff members of the university in general and of the faculty of law in particular who used to be always present in strength during the hearings had bothered to peep into the record with a discerning eye. ..... of course, it was mentioned that one booklet had been snatched away from the faculty of arts centre but neither the room number from which it had been allegedly taken was mentioned nor the number of that booklet nor the series to which it belonged. ..... (v) it is not possible to believe that somebody could remove the booklet and run away with the same when university and law faculty officials were present in that very verandah in which the window opens. ..... 03453 retained in the dispatch book and which relates to this very examination in the faculty of arts centre mentions the following in column numbers 3 and 4 : '3.no. ..... and if the petitioner is to be believed the dean of the faculty of law was actually approached but he lent a deaf ear. ..... it mentions absentees as 102 in number though as per the attendance sheets of the arts faculty centre taken together the absentees numbered 103. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... under article 226 of the constitution of india, the petitioner challenges the selection process for appointment to the post of assistant professor in the faculty of law in the university of delhi on the ground that criteria for selection which is laid down wrongly excludes advocates having experience of practice, and instead only giving weightage to teaching experience of a candidate, and it is argued that resultantly there is arbitrariness, discrimination of excluding advocates experience and violation of article 14 of the constitution of india. ..... the qualifications required for appointment to the post of assistant professor in the faculty of law read as under:-" assistant professor: for faculties of applied social sciences & humanities; arts, commerce and business; inter-disciplinary and applied sciences (except physical education); law; mathematical sciences; sciences (except home science, nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and pharmacy); and ..... (c) no.2219/2017 page 1 of 5 experience as an advocate is not being given weightage, and therefore, because of the latter aspect the selection process is arbitrary and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india.2. ..... anuj bhandari, advocate with mr. ..... abhinav sharma, advocate. ..... naveen kumar gautam, advocate. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... gaurang panandiker, advocates versus university of delhi, faculty of medical sciences & ors ..... ..... mrinalini sen gupta, advocates versus university of delhi & ors ..... ..... manan khera, advocates for r-4/mci. ..... saakshi agarwal, advocate for r-3/uoi. mr. t. ..... manan khera, advocates for r-5/mci. ..... puja sarkar, advocate for r4/uoi. mr. t. ..... yanmi phazang, advocates for r-1/du. mr. ..... nidhesh gupta, senior advocate with ms. r.s. ..... yanmi phazang, advocates for r-1/du. ms. ..... indu malhotra, senior advocate with mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... for kausik ghosh, advocates university of delhi. ..... versus the vice chancellor, faculty of science, university enclave & ors ........ ..... meenu pandey, advocates. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 162(2009)DLT733
..... it was also submitted that on a random survey of 28 court cases conducted in november-december 2001 by the faculty legal service programme of the faculty of law, university of delhi under the supervision of its director, professor b.b. ..... pandey assisted by santosh kumar, advocate, it was found that in the guise of scrutiny, the prosecutors had, in fact, issued memos in each of the 28 cases containing directions to the investigating officer which varied froma) collecting further specified documentary evidence;b) citing new ..... santosh kumar, advocates, filed a reply affidavit to the petition on behalf of the accused in this case. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... gaurang panandiker, advocates versus university of delhi, faculty of medical sciences & ors ..... ..... mrinalini sen gupta, advocates versus university of delhi & ors ..... ..... manan khera, advocates for r-4/mci. ..... saakshi agarwal, advocate for r-3/uoi. mr. t. ..... manan khera, advocates for r-5/mci. ..... puja sarkar, advocate for r4/uoi. mr. t. ..... yanmi phazang, advocates for r-1/du. mr. ..... nidhesh gupta, senior advocate with ms. r.s. ..... yanmi phazang, advocates for r-1/du. ms. ..... indu malhotra, senior advocate with mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... she disclosed that she herself told about the facts of this case to her son as well as to her advocate. ..... i had gone through the suit and told my son to give instructions to the advocate. ..... whatever is written in the suit was told by my son to the advocate. ..... i do not consider myself of having proper mental faculty. .....
Tag this Judgment!