Active - Judgment Search Results

Meat Cutters Vs. Jewel Tea

Court: US Supreme Court

..... laws derives from a synthesis of all pertinent legislation and hold that collective bargaining activity concerning mandatory subjects of bargaining under the national labor relations act is not ..... bradley held that the clayton and norris laguardia acts precluded federal courts from enjoining activities concerned with even some nonmandatory subjects of bargaining congress has since provided that union .....

Anil Starch Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1966]59ITR514(Guj)

..... the transfer of a business asset from one of his activities to another activity even if such a transfer takes place in order ..... in the case was when profits of two different activities both admittedly trading activities of the same assessee have to the separately computed ..... to be separately computed since the profits of both the trading activities belong to the same assessee but since the act itself .....

United States Vs. Brown

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that a legislature can provide that persons possessing certain characteristics must abstain from certain activities but must leave to other tribunals the task of deciding who possesses those ..... presented serious difficulties of proof see hearings before the house committee on un american activities communist infiltration of vital industries and current communist techniques in the chicago illinois .....

Dombrowski Vs. Pfister

Court: US Supreme Court

..... constitutional adjudication thereafter appellants alleged the individual appellants were indicted under the subversive activities and communist control law they also claimed that there was no prospect ..... prosecuting or threatening to prosecute appellants for alleged violations of the louisiana subversive activities and communist control law and the communist propaganda control law footnote 1 .....

Smt. Gaindi Bai and ors. Vs. C.i.T.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1966All469; [1966]59ITR353(All)

..... do whatever with each other and held that they did not constitute one business different activities do not constitute different businesses merely because they are done al different times in ..... constitute same business can also be taken into consideration in deciding the question whether two activities carried on at different limes by different partnerships constitute same business or not rowlatt j .....

Shree Ramesh Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Calcutt ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1967]64ITR317(Cal)

..... assessee contended that this sum should be adjusted towards the income from his other trading activities the tribunal negatived this contention on the ground that his business in shares was different ..... to the clerks and accountants the essential thing is the nature and texture of the activities said to constitute one business selling shares and selling petrol both involve transfer and delivery .....

American Committee Vs. Sacb

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of appeals for the district of columbia circuit syllabus since the order of the subversive activities control board affirmed by the court of appeals requiring that petitioner register as a communist ..... defendants in deportation and denaturalization proceedings much of this evidence appears to have concerned the activities of the local committees the board found for example that the cases of joe weber .....

Hanna Mining Co. Vs. Marine Engineers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... question of where lies the line between permissible and federally preempted state regulation of union activities i petitioners hanna are four corporations whose integrated fleet of great lakes vessels carriers ..... upon supervisory employees the rights to engage in self organization collective bargaining and other concerted activities footnote 11 under the umbrella of 8 of the act as amended 61 stat .....

American Ship Building Co. Vs. Labor Board

Court: US Supreme Court

..... such criticism the committee added a provision prohibiting employee interference with employer bargaining activities footnote 13 and deleted the reference to the lockout footnote 14 a plausible ..... certain affirmative rights on employees and by placing certain enumerated restrictions on the activities of employers the act prohibited acts which interfered with restrained or coerced employees .....

National Labor Relations Board Vs. Brown

Court: US Supreme Court

..... bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection and shall ..... u s 297 but surely that consideration cannot justify employer tandem action destructive of concerted activity four the court asserts that the right of nonstruck employers to hire temporary replacements .....