Active - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: active Year: 1933 Page 1 of about 69 results (0.014 seconds)Chidambargauda Ramchandragauda Desai and ors. Vs. Channappa Mahalingap ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-18-1933
Reported in: 153Ind.Cas.637
baker j 1 although the record of this group of appeals is voluminous there are only three points for decision...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChidambargauda Ramchandragauda Desai Vs. Channappa Mahalingappa
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-18-1933
Reported in: AIR1934Bom329; (1934)36BOMLR694
baker j 1 although the record of this group of appeals is voluminous there are only three points for decision...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the Matter of Messrs. Burn and Co.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-25-1933
Reported in: [1934]2ITR30(Cal)
this matter came before us on a case stated by the commissioner of income tax bengal under section 66 2...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRogers Vs. Guaranty Trust Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-23-1933
..... sixteen directors including a president five vice presidents a secretary and a treasurer all actively engaged in its management for many years these officers have receive large annual fixed ..... be found rather than in the place of the technical corporate domicile extension of corporate activities distribution of corporate personnel stockholders and directors through many states and the diffusion of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmperor Vs. Surjya Kumar Sen and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-14-1933
Reported in: AIR1934Cal221,147Ind.Cas.32
..... revolutionaries and their sympathisers sought directions as to the best manner in which their unlawful activities could be employed mr basu has described the inferences that we hold have been rightly ..... assumption if a person voluntarily elects to put on record a statement of his criminal activities and thereafter neither repudiates that statement nor offers a reasonable explanation of it ha has .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLouis K. Liggett Co. Vs. Lee
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-13-1933
..... corporations footnote 26 b limitations upon the scope of a business corporation s powers and activity were also long universal at first corporations could be formed under the general laws ..... whenever the discrimination is for a permitted purpose as when a state having concluded that activity by corporations should be curbed seeks to favor businesses conducted by individuals the corporate character .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnglo-chilean Nitrate Sales Corp Vs. Alabama
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-06-1933
..... capital employed within the state a measure obviously inapplicable to dormant corporations in such circumstances activity is an event that conditions liability but the privilege not the event is still the ..... made no use of the taxable franchise emanating from the state but has confined its activities to interstate or foreign commerce what has been said in recent cases educational films corp .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Dubilier Condenser Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-10-1933
..... is composed of divisions each charged with a specified field of activity one of which is the electrical division these are further subdivided ..... department is so to speak a business department operating a business activity of the government the employee has the same rights as one ..... is upon notice that whatever he invents in the field of activity of the bureau broadly defined belongs to the public and is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHawks Vs. Hamill
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-09-1933
..... 56 3 federal courts are especially reluctant to restrain the activities of state officers where the rights set up by plaintiffs ..... granted is an interference by the process of injunction with the activities of state officers discharging in good faith their supposed official ..... counties propose to sue for fines and penalties all these activities the respondents ask us to enjoin indeed all have been .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBurnet Vs. A. T. Jergins Trust
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-13-1933
..... remote from any governmental function that the effect of the exaction on the city s activities was inconsiderable and its collection was consistent with and did not trench upon the immunity ..... lying between the two extremes it becomes necessary to draw the line which separates those activities having some relation to government which are nevertheless subject to taxation from those which are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial