Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... the learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that as a matter of fact the date on which the accident took place, vehicle was under the period of valid insurance cover of the previous owner and the moment delivery of possession was given to the subsequent owner, i.e. ..... and the owner of the vehicle are bound by terms and conditions of the contract and a contract can only be presumed between the owner of the vehicle and the insurance company on the date when such accident took place. ..... the respondent-complainant was not the owner of the vehicle on the date of accident. 12. ..... (2007) cpj 411 (nc), wherein it has been held that the transferee is not entitled to get benefit of insurance policy, as such, owner cannot claim any claim from the insurance company even if the car met an accident. 8. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... on 8.10.1992 the appellant was informed about the accident and then the complainant filled up claim form and filed before the insurance company. ..... the aforesaid bus met with an accident in the night of 1.10.1992 near jalalgarh police station and station diary entry no. ..... the insurance company was informed about the accident on 8.10.1992. ..... the complainants vehicle was insured with the appellant and during the period of insurance in the night of 1.10.1992 the bus met with an accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... the learned lawyer appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that double accident benefit is the privilege attached to the policy and is payable upon subjective satisfaction of ..... complainant made a delay in submission of the required documents relating to the accident and death of the life assured and upon receipt of the documents, the ..... there is no affidavit of local persons who had seen the accident and none of the local witnesses has supported the contention of ..... the police after investigation submitted final form mentioning that accident was due to negligent and rash driving of the ..... as per terms of clause 10 of the policy bond, double accident benefit claim is not payable where the death was caused due to an illegal act committed by ..... for decision is whether repudiation of the claim of double accident benefit claim of the complainant by the l.i.c. ..... did not pay the double accident benefit claim in spite of ..... one lac as under double accident benefit scheme to the complainant along with 9% interest from the date she submitted the claim papers till the date of payment within three months from the date ..... this part of the claim of double accident benefit on the basis of the f.i.r ..... , he died in the bus accident of which he was himself ..... is a bus driver and in accident he died, as such, he is entitled for double accident benefit. ..... assured was charged with rash and negligent driving, therefore it was an illegal act and he was not entitled for the benefit under the double accident benefit scheme. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... on the application of one amaresh kumar dated 20.10.1994 the line was disconnected as there had been fire accident in her house on 30.9.1994. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... was not liable to pay the additional sum as claimed against the double accident benefit because as per police report life assured anuj kumar died in an altercation which was due to his having illicit relation with the sister of accused person and they planned to kill him. ..... to pay the remaining amount of the double accident benefit policy of the life assured i.e., rs. ..... this amounts to death caused due to immorality and in clause 10(b) of the policy bond it is mentioned that life assured is not entitled for double accident benefit if the cause of death is immorality. ..... 81/2000 by district forum, nawadah whereby the district forum has held that complainant is not entitled to get double accident benefit and dismissed the complaint. 2. ..... from the facts enumerated above the complainants husband have a policy of double accident benefit for the sum of rs. ..... 1,14,755/- only through cheque on 15.10.1999 but they did not pay the additional sum against the double accident benefit as per terms of the l.i.c. ..... his death was caused on immorality as such under the terms and conditions of the insurance policy the company was not liable to pay additional sum against double accident benefit. ..... therefore, the death of the life assured cannot be treated as death by accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... submitted before us that the document which were asked for by the insurance company were necessary for consideration of accident benefit scheme because the satisfaction of the l.i.c. ..... 50,000/- more under double accident benefit scheme and on this ground this amount was repudiated. 3. ..... 50,000/- towards the double accident benefit claim with interest @ 9% from 16.3.2001 till the date of payment and rs. ..... 50,000/- under double accident benefit scheme to the complainant and the amount of interest @ 9% due to deficiency on the part of the l.i.c. ..... only on being satisfied that complainants husband died in an accident as he was shot dead, rs. ..... 50,000/- under double accident benefit scheme by the complainants husband is admitted. ..... for making payment under double accident benefit scheme. ..... the double accident benefit cannot be claimed as a matter of right. ..... 50,000/- as of double accident benefit scheme besides interest and compensation. ..... 50,000/- as the sum assured and rs 10,700/- as bonus) but repudiated the claim of further payment under double accident benefit scheme. ..... 50,000/- under the double accident benefit scheme. ..... was essential to come to the conclusion that life assured had died due to an accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... were insured as accident insurance policy and fire policy (a) for the period 22.11.1996 to 21.11.1997, both for a sum of rs. ..... the bank and the insurance company were informed of the accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... submitted that complainant has miserably failed to produce any evidence including the evidence of an expert that there was any negligence on his part when he was attending the patient on the first date of her accident, that is, 7.10.1994 and treated her and gave her first aid. ..... -doctor was negligent in attending the patient when she was brought in his clinic on the first date of her accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... bria-5619; (ii) the truck was insured with oriental insurance company (appellant); (iii) the truck met an accident on 23.5.1996 during the period of its insurance; (iv) the insurance company appointed two surveyors and they submitted their report. ..... the first surveyor madhurendra roy inspected the damaged truck on 12.6.1996 after about 20 days of the accident and submitted the report on 6.8.1996. ..... from 4.9.1996 on the ground that there was considerable delay of about 2 years in the submission of the claim on the part of the appellant which should have been made within three months from the date of accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... he had brought on record of the district forum photo copies of certain documents (miscellaneous accident insurance policy, charge-sheet, statement dated 4.5.1992 of the complainant, correspondence with surveyor and the insurance company) but no affidavit to the effect that the photo copies of the documents were true photo copies of .....
Tag this Judgment!