Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... he was required to sign some insurance papers at dumka when nature of accident, place and date of accident were all kept secret from him. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... it is not disputed that the complainant sustained severe fracture in the left thigh in an accident on 6.2.1996 and he was under the treatment of dr. ..... the brief facts of the complaint case are that the complainant sustained a severe fracture of bone in left thigh in a bus accident on 6.2.1996. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... branch manager, national insurance company, city branch office was informed about the fire accident on 21.12.1992. ..... intimation regarding settlement of claim was given to him on 7.11.1994 only on service of pleaders notice after lapse of about two years from the date of accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... the learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that as a matter of fact the date on which the accident took place, vehicle was under the period of valid insurance cover of the previous owner and the moment delivery of possession was given to the subsequent owner, i.e. ..... and the owner of the vehicle are bound by terms and conditions of the contract and a contract can only be presumed between the owner of the vehicle and the insurance company on the date when such accident took place. ..... the respondent-complainant was not the owner of the vehicle on the date of accident. 12. ..... (2007) cpj 411 (nc), wherein it has been held that the transferee is not entitled to get benefit of insurance policy, as such, owner cannot claim any claim from the insurance company even if the car met an accident. 8. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... were opened by the mechanic whereupon the said surveyor directed for preparation of list of internal parts damaged in the accident and accordingly the garage owner prepared the list which, as per direction of the surveyor, was submitted to opposite party no. ..... it is not disputed that at the time of accident the maruti van of the complainant was under insurance cover provided by the opposite party. ..... regarding the accident had been lodged and hence the alleged accident is doubtful. ..... information regarding accident was given to the branch manager (opposite party no. ..... of darbhanga which also makes the accident doubtful. ..... -7806 which was under insurance cover provided by the opposite party, met an accident on 20.6.1993. ..... ) of accident but the identity and the registration number of the offending tractor has not been disclosed. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... bpk 903 insured by the national insurance company limited, sitamarhi branch of which the opposite party is the branch manager; that the said motor cycle, however, met with an accident on 15.11.91 causing extensive damage for which he filed his claim before the insurance company-opposite party on 18th november, 1991; that in spite of repeated reminders the opposite party did not settle the claim of the ..... the district forum in this situation and also taking into consideration that the complainant has not disclosed either the place of the accident or the manner of the accident dismissed the complaint by their impugned order against which the present appeal has been filed by the complainant-appellant. ..... on being noticed the opposite party appeared and filed counter version controverting the claim of the complainant mainly on the ground that the motor cycle of the complainant has not met with any accident and the claim of the complainant, therefore, is bogus and is fit to be dismissed. 4. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... further case was that the national insurance company limited takes the risk of personal accident policy duly hypothecated to it through the peerless general finance and investment company limited and has got no direct dealing whatsoever with the complainant. ..... it was not disputed that the insurance company had taken the risk of personal accident policy of the deceased duly hypothecated to it through peerless general finance and investment company limited (appellant). ..... from the investigators report it transpired that the alleged accident was never authenticated from the reliable sources like hospital where the father of the complainant is said to have succumbed to the injury or from the police station where such cases are registered. ..... the moment the said accident was reported to the insurance company, an investigator was appointed and on the basis of the report submitted by the investigator the claim of the complainant was found to be non existent. ..... reporting of such accident to the police under sections 40 and 174 of the criminal procedure code is a must for substantiating accidental claim but nothing like this had been done in this case. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... regarding the delay in giving the information about the accident, it is seen that no period is prescribed within which the information must be given to the insurer. ..... the case of the appellant-insurance company, however, is that there was a delay in submitting the information of the appellant which was given to him after the date of accident and the cash memo was submitted very late i.e. ..... further it is contended by the appellant that there was a taxi, which was met with an accident and was carrying 60 to 70 passengers against 16 passengers. ..... information for the accident was given on 25.5.1989 to the appellant and a claim for rs. ..... 13.5.89 when the accident took place. ..... the accident, therefore, occurred on the date which fell within the period for which the vehicle was insured. ..... the facts of the case in brief are that the maxi-taxi bearing number bhc 2223 belonging to the complainant-respondent met an accident on 13.5.1989. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... submitted before us that the document which were asked for by the insurance company were necessary for consideration of accident benefit scheme because the satisfaction of the l.i.c. ..... 50,000/- more under double accident benefit scheme and on this ground this amount was repudiated. 3. ..... 50,000/- towards the double accident benefit claim with interest @ 9% from 16.3.2001 till the date of payment and rs. ..... 50,000/- under double accident benefit scheme to the complainant and the amount of interest @ 9% due to deficiency on the part of the l.i.c. ..... only on being satisfied that complainants husband died in an accident as he was shot dead, rs. ..... 50,000/- under double accident benefit scheme by the complainants husband is admitted. ..... for making payment under double accident benefit scheme. ..... the double accident benefit cannot be claimed as a matter of right. ..... 50,000/- as of double accident benefit scheme besides interest and compensation. ..... 50,000/- as the sum assured and rs 10,700/- as bonus) but repudiated the claim of further payment under double accident benefit scheme. ..... 50,000/- under the double accident benefit scheme. ..... was essential to come to the conclusion that life assured had died due to an accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... submitted that complainant has miserably failed to produce any evidence including the evidence of an expert that there was any negligence on his part when he was attending the patient on the first date of her accident, that is, 7.10.1994 and treated her and gave her first aid. ..... -doctor was negligent in attending the patient when she was brought in his clinic on the first date of her accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!