Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: accident Court: uttaranchal Page 25 of about 710 results (0.021 seconds)

Darshan Lal Vs. State

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1488

..... . the explanation put forward by the appellant in his statement that he had been to the house of his father-in-law in the night of the accident and was thus not available in the house in the next morning, was false and this is also an additional link in the chain of the circumstances existing against the appellant.25 .....

State of Uttaranchal Through District Information Officer Vs. Addition ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC160

rajesh tandon, j.1. heard sri v.k. kholi learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and learned standing counsel.2. by the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.8.2000 and 19.6.2002 (annexure 6 and 7 to the writ petition) passed by the district judge, dehradun.3. brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the respondent no. 3-om prakash sukhija being the owner of the dehradun property no. 9/ 4, ashly hall, ground floor had let out the property to the tenant-district information officer, dehradun @ rs. 150/- per month. the respondent no. 3 has filed an application under section 21 (8) of the u.p. act, 1972 for enhancement of the rent to the extent of rs. 6,666.66 on the ground that the market value of the property is about more than rs. 8 lakhs and the area of premises is 600 sq. ft. the respondent no. 3 has stated that the market value of property being rs. 8 lakhs and he is entitled for a sum equivalent to one-twelfth of ten percent of the market value of the building under tenancy.4. the petitioner has filed the objections before the respondent stating therein that the disputed property is in a dilapidated condition and the sum rs. 6,666.66 as rent of the disputed property calculated by the respondent no. 3 is exorbitant one.5. before dealing with the arguments of both the parties, it is necessary to incorporate section 21 (8) of u.p. act no. 13 of 1972, the same is quoted below:-'nothing in clause (a) of sub-section (1) .....

Zestha Developers Ltd. Vs. State of Uttarakhand

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2009Utr50

..... -- (1) if, owing to urgent necessity or unavoidable accident, any document executed, or copy of a decree or order made, in india is not presented for registration till after the expiration of the time hereinbefore prescribed in that behalf, the registrar, in cases where the delay in presentation does .....

State of Uttarakhand Vs. Smt. Asha Bisht

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR353]

..... 2,550/- per month and he was aged about 40 years at the time of accident. .....

Sanjeev Sehgal S/O Sri Charan Das Sehgal Vs. A.D.J. 4th F.T.C. and ors ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... kaushalya devi died in a motor accident and she has got compensation of rs. .....

Bijendra Singh Sajwan S/O Late Sri Padam Chand Sajwan Vs. the State of ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... doctor, he had applied for medical leave, which was duly sanctioned by the principal and, that on 09th may, 1992, he was going on a scooter to purchase the medicines and to consult the doctor, when he met with an accident and was admitted in the hospital. .....

Bhairav Dutt Vs. State

Court : Uttaranchal

..... this witness also deposed that on the day of accident accused had demanded water from her daughter and when her daughter went in the kitchen to take water for the accused, the accused mixed the poison in the water from a small bottle. .....

Girish Chandra Sharma, and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

1. this criminal application, preferred u/s 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as cr.p.c.), is directed for quashing the charge sheet and also the entire proceedings in criminal case no.2641 of 2006, u/s 323/506/498-a ipc & 3/4 dowry prohibition act [hereinafter to be referred as the act], pending before j.m., haldwani.2. heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.3. in brief, the facts of the case are that the respondent no.2 smt. kamlesh sharma lodged an fir with the averments that petitioner girish chandra sharma (samdhi of complainant) proposed for marriage of complainant's daughter with the petitioner saurabh aggarwal, s/o pawan kumar aggarwal (petitioner), which was accepted by the complainant. on 14.4.2005 engagement ceremony was solemnized in which the complainant gave money to the relations of her in-laws. after the engagement, the petitioner saurabh took rs.60,000/- at different times from her daughter nidhi. when since long the date of marriage was not fixed, then the complainant enquired from petitioner girish chand sharma on which he told that on being paid rs.2.00 lacs in cash, the date would be fixed, which the complainant somehow managed to give the same to them. later on the date fixed, the petitioner saurabh alone came for marriage and when the complainant enquired from petitioner girish chandra about the parents of saurabh, who informed that his friend pawan kumar (petitioner) is demanding .....

Paramount Health Services Tpa Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indrapal Singh and Others

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... on 16.10.2007, the complainant met with an accident and suffered head injuries. .....

Dablu Singh @ Dampi and Another Vs. State of Uttrakhand

Court : Uttaranchal

..... she further disclosed that on 15th of february 2004, dablu singh came to her at odd hours with bandage on his ear, who told her that he suffered the said injury in some accident. .....