Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : I(2003)ACC189
..... the appeal is sought to be filed against an award dated 3.5.2001 passed by the motor accident claims tribunal awarding a sum of rs. ..... the accident was allegedly caused by the truck owned by the respondent no. 1. ..... 2 and 3 for the death of one amit singh in a motor accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : 2004ACJ270
..... appeal is sought to be filed against an award dated 3.5.2001 passed by the motor accidents claims tribunal awarding a sum of rs. ..... the accident was allegedly caused by the truck owned by the respondent no. 1. ..... 2 and 3 for the death of one amit singh in a motor accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : I(2003)ACC92; 2002ACJ2074
a.a. desai, c.j. and p.c. verma, j. 1. heard sri manoj tewari, learned counsel for the appellant at length.2. the deceased at the time of the accident was aged about 45 years. the tribunal estimated his monthly income at rs. 1.8oo and awarded compensation of rs. 2.16.000. we do not see any reason that the amount as awarded is exorbitant.3. sri manoj tewari, learned counsel for the appellant, further urged that the driver of the vehicle insured with the appellant was not holding any driving licence. as such, the appellant company could not be saddled with the responsibility of compensation. we are not impressed by the ground as raised. however, the insurance company can prosecute against the owner of the vehicle in accordance with law for the liability saddled on the appellant.4. the appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid observation.
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : 2004CriLJ1660
..... sheela and that even on 24-6-1997 when he got burnt injuries in an accident, his wife smt. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : AIR2004Utr17
..... civil law, jus, constitui oportet in his quoe ut plurimum accidunt, non quoe ex inoplnato; for, neque leges neque senatusconsulta ita scribi possunt ut omnes casus qui qundoque inclderint comprehendantur, sed sufficit ea quoe plerumque accident constlneri; laws cannot be so worded as to include every case which may arise, but it is sufficient if they apply to those things which most frequently happen.'10. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : 2003CriLJ4586
..... . this also rule out the possibility of sustaining the fire-firm injury as a result of accident, alleged by the appellant.23 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : I(2004)ACC195; 2005ACJ517
..... (sc), it has been held as under:'according to us, in its wisdom parliament rightly thought that prescribing a period of limitation and restricting the power of tribunal to entertain any claim petition beyond twelve months from the date of the accident was harsh, inequitable and in many cases was likely to cause injustice to the claimants. ..... this appeal has been filed by the claimants against the order dated 22.12.1981 passed by motor accidents claims tribunal, pithoragarh, rejecting the application under section 5 of limitation act.2. ..... the motor accidents claims tribunal is directed to decide the petition within three months after filing of the certified copy of the order. ..... motor accidents claims tribunal, 1989 acj 181 (kerala), it was held that even in the absence of a provision in procedural laws, power inheres in every tribunal, of a judicial or quasi-judicial character, to adopt modalities necessary to achieve requirements of natural justice .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : 2005ACJ288
..... 1, which reads as follows:'whether the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of bus no. ..... has come by way of appeal under section 173 of motor vehicles act, 1988, against judgment and order passed by motor accidents claims tribunal on 3.8.2002 in m.a.c.t. ..... the accident took place near village rampur. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : 3(2005)ACC611
..... in both the cases the tribunal took the view that the, accident took place due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of the bus owned by gyan singh. ..... being aggrieved by the award dated 6.5.1995 passed by the motor accident claims tribunal/third additional district judge, nainital, in m.a.c.t. ..... 542 of 1991 by motor accident claims tribunal (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as 'the tribunal')- in the petition filed by kulbhushan singhal and others as legal representatives of their son dr. ..... the couple was driving in the same vehicle on 16.7.1991 when the accident took place. ..... the accident was the result of actionable negligence on the part of the driver of the bus. ..... the accident took place on 19.2.1984. ..... the accident took place. at 8.40 a.m. ..... he contended that even the photocopy of the cover indicated that the policy had lapsed on the date of the accident. ..... in both the cases the tribunal took the view that the claimants had failed to prove that on the date of the accident, i.e. ..... the couple had two minor children apurva (age 11 years) and aditya (age 6 years) on the date of accident. dr. ..... archana singhal was 36 years of age on the date of accident, i.e. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : 2005ACJ1035; AIR2004Utr36
..... in both the cases the tribunal took the view that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of the bus owned by gyan singh. ..... being aggrieved by the award dated 6th may 1995 passed by motor accident claims tribunal/iiird additional district judge, nainital in mact case no. ..... 542 of 1991 by motor accident claims tribunal hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as the tribunal). ..... the couple was driving in the same vehicle on 16th july 1991 when the accident took place. ..... the accident was the result of actionable negligence on the part of the driver of the bus. ..... the accident took place on 19th february 1984. ..... the accident took place. at 8:40 a.m. ..... he contended that even the photocopy of the cover indicated that the policy had lapsed on the date of the accident. ..... in both the cases the tribunal took the view that the claimants had failed to prove that on the date of the accident, i.e. ..... the couple had two minor children apurva (age 11 years) and aditya (age 6 years) on the date of the accident. dr. ..... archana singhal was 36 years of age on the date of accident i.e. .....
Tag this Judgment!