Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... fertilizer purchased during the period of 12 months preceding the date of accident during the currency of the scheme on different dates shall have an accumulative effect. ..... the assured died on 16.03.2008 in a road accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... as per the certificate dated 04.01.2010 issued by the gram panchayat, baar ganga, the deceased died in a road accident during the course of his employment. ..... viresh kumar has died in a road accident on 22.12.2009. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : [2004(101)FLR133]; (2004)2UPLBEC55
rajesh tandon, j.1. heard the learned counsel for the parties at length.2. writ petition no. 756 of 2001 has been filed by the state for the issue of a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the award dated 15.6.1995 passed by the labour court in favour of sri munna singh chauhan.3. writ petition no. 4703 of 2001 (ss) has been filed by sri munna singh chauhan for the issue of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise his services.4. brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that sri munna singh chauhan filed the claim petition before the presiding officer, labour court, dehradun by which he has prayed for his reinstatement in the services of the state of uttaranchal, division irrigation department, dakpathar.5. according to sri munna singh chauhan, he was engaged in the department on 5th november, 1980 as helper. he continued to work as such till 28.3.1989 but the services of the petitioner was terminated without any notice as well as without assigning any reasons. the employee concerned has claimed the benefit of section 6-n of the u.p. industrial disputes act, 1947 in as much as he has completed 240 days of his services.6. following matter was referred to the presiding officer, labour court, dehradun:^^d;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk vius jfed jh equuk flagpksgku iq= jh ofqz;k] in gsyij dh lsok;sa fnukad 28-3-89 ls lekir fd;k tkukvuqfpr rfkk@vfkok os/kkfud gsa ;fn gk rks lacafu/kr jfed d;kfgrykhk@ .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... in the said case, the injured was a cart puller and in the accident, he suffered multiple fractures in left leg and underwent two surgeries and his left leg below knee was amputated. ..... another; iv (2010) acc 815 (sc), wherein the honble apex court has held that under the motor vehicles act, 1988, just compensation is one which should fully and adequately restore claimant to position prior to accident. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... on 20.01.2008, when the insured vehicle was returning from rai bareilly to nainital, it met with an accident and got badly damaged. ..... an fir was lodged with police station mohanlalgunj, lucknow and the opposite party was also informed immediately about the accident by the complainants husband. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... so far as non-lodging of the fir is concerned, no criminal act took place and the insured had not met with a road accident as he fell on his own and hence lodging of fir was not necessary. ..... , 15.02.2008 and the college staff took the insured to the hospital, where the doctors declared him dead on account of the injuries sustained by him in an accident. 9. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : AIR2006Utr78
cyriac joseph, c.j.1. the petitioner claims to be a practising doctor who is having an ultrasound centre and x-ray clinic known as chitra ultrasound centre at 5 - new road, dehradun. the said ultrasound centre has been registered under the preconception and pre-natal diagonostic techniques (prohibition of sex selection) act, 1994 (for short pndt act). according to the petitioner, the registration certificate bears no. a/cmo/16 dated 10-12-2001. the grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the registration of the petitioner's ultrasound centre was first suspended and then cancelled illegally. as per annexure 1 order dated 23-2-2005, the registration was suspended under section 20(3) of the pndt act by the chief medical officer, dehradun who is the appropriate authority at the district level. the petitioner was also asked to show cause why the registration should not be cancelled. in reply to annexure 1 notice/'suspension order, the petitioner submitted annexure 2 explanation. however, as per annexure 3 order dated 14-3-2005, the chief medical officer, dehradun cancelled the registration of the ultrasound centre under section 20(2) of the pndt act. against annexure 3 order, the petitioner filed annexure 4 appeal before the appropriate authority at state level. but the appellate authority, as per annexure 5 communication dated 27-6-2005, informed the petitioner that his appeal cannot be entertained in view of the criminal proceedings pending before court. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC122
rajesh tandon, j.1. heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. by the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation.3. briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the petitioner was initially appointed on 30.9.1991 by the children development project officer on daily wages as junior clerk and he has joined the services on 1.10.1991. the petitioner has stated that his services were terminated as one sri prakash chandra bahuguna was appointed by the commissioner, garhwal mandal vide order dated 6.6.1993 on adhoc basis due to which the services of the petitioner were terminated by order dated 1.11.1993. against which the petitioner has filed a writ petition no. 44462 of 1993 before the allahabad high court and the court has directed the respondents to treat the petitioner in service on the post of junior clerk on daily wages and to pay the salary. the petitioner has stated that on 21.10.1994 an interview of daily wager junior clerks was taken but the children development project officer, vikas nagar, dehradun had no information regarding such interview due to which the petitioner could not attend the interview. however, on 29.10.1994 the bal vikas pariyojana adhikari wrote a letter to the director, bal vikas sewa evam pushtahar requesting to conduct an interview for the petitioner in future. the petitioner has .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : (2005)ILLJ260UC
rajesh tandon, j.1. by the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the award dated february 10, 2001 passed by respondent no. 2 i.e. the presiding officer, labour court, dehradun.facts:2. brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that respondent no. 1 was appointed on april 1, 1987 as beldar in the department of petitioner no. 2 and he continued up to january 9, 1992, but on january 10, 1992, his services were terminated without any prior notice, which is in violation of the provisions contained under section 6-n of the u.p. industrial disputes act, 1947.therefore, the respondent no. 1 raised the dispute under section 4-k of the u.p. industrial disputes act, 1947. following matter was referred to the presiding officer, labour court, dehradun:'vernacular matter omitted.'the labour court after hearing both the parties held that the termination order passed by the petitioner-department is illegal and therefore, directed the petitioner to reinstate respondent no. 1, however because of delay in filing the claim petition, the labour court moulded the relief and awarded rs. 5,000/- as compensation towards back wages to the petitioner.3. being aggrieved by this judgment of the labour court, petitioner has preferred the present writ petition. i have heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the record. after hearing both the parties, following points arise for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal
Reported in : (2005)2UPLBEC67
rajesh tandon, j.1. heard the learned counsel for the parties at length.2. the petitioners have filed the present writ petitions for the issue of a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to treat the petitioners as regular employees of the department and pay them salary as it is being given to the petitioners in pursuance of the order dated 29.7.1999 with all the benefits available to the regular employees of the department in the corresponding cadre and for a writ of certiorari quashing orders dated 10.4.2000, 6.9.2000, 21.4.2000 and 29.8.2000.3. brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the petitioners were appointed on daily wages on the posts of meth and beldar and they were made work charge employees of the department between 1983 and 1988 and since then they are continuously working in the department.4. that state of u.p. has issued a g.o. on 15.10.1997 in respect of regularisation of the work charge employees of the department who are working continuously for the last several years. according to g.o. as work charge employees who have rendered continuous satisfactory service of 5 years or more than 5 years till 31st march, 1997 shall be regularised on the post held by them. the relevant clause of the g.o. is mentioned below :5. the petitioners have stated that they have completed more than 5 years of service upto 31st of march, 1997 and they were appointed as work charge employees prior to.29.8.1991.6. on 3.7.1999 .....
Tag this Judgment!