Accelerate - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: accelerate Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 92 results (0.006 seconds)Zelman Vs. Simmons-harris
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-2002
zelman v simmons harris 536 u s 639 2002 october term 2001 syllabus zelman superintendent of public instruction of ohio...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.S. Ziauddeen Vs. S. Ashok Kumar, Principal Sessions Judge, (Residing ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2002
Reported in: (2002)2MLJ74
order1 this writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of quo warranto against the first respondent who is a...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRef. by President
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-28-2002
Reported in: AIR2003SC87; (2002)8SCC237
acts rules orders constitution of india articles 69 69 2 75 79 83 85 85 1 85 2 87 88...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajnarainsingh Avadhraj Singh, Vs. Smt. Vidyadevi Widow of Ramraj Sing ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-12-2002
Reported in: 2003(4)ALLMR1071
orderr m s khandeparkar j heard the advocates for the parties perusedthe record 1 in the facts and circumstances of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubramanian V. Iyer Vs. Air India
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-30-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)BomCR579; (2002)4BOMLR860; [2003(96)FLR624]; (2003)IILLJ678Bom; 2003(1)MhLj871
r m lodha j 1 subramanian v iyer petitioner hereinchallenges by means of this writ petition theorder dated 2nd august...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUday Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC3143; 2002CriLJ4655; 2002(4)Crimes157(SC); JT2002(6)SC423; 2002(6)SCALE207; (2002)7SCC79
..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... accelerated promotion but not the seniority constitution of india article 16 4a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGeneral Finance Co. and anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC3126; (2002)176CTR(SC)569; [2002]257ITR338(SC); [2002(3)JCR146(SC)]; JT2002(6)SC426; 2002(6)SCALE198; (2002)7SCC1; [2002]SUPP2SCR106; [2002]124TAXMAN432(SC)
..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... accelerated promotion but not the seniority non compliance with section 269ss of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Public Prosecutor Vs. Mahadi Thirupathi Reddy and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC3128; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)564; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)287; 2002CriLJ4119; 2002(4)Crimes181(SC); JT2002(6)SC444; 2002(6)SCALE196; (2002)7SCC36
..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... accelerated promotion but not the seniority constitution of india article 16 4a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGeegraj J. Naik and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Jan-11-2002
Reported in: (2003)(2)SLJ459CAT
..... 2001 the applicants have now maintained that they had not received any jumping promotion or accelerated promotion and therefore promotion to the post of office superintendent was in keeping with the ..... that the applicants had not got any promotion which may be called jumping promotion or accelerated promotion according to him whatever promotions accrued to the applicants were purely on merit and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhavna Nalinkant Nanavati Vs. Cgt
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-25-2002
Reported in: (2002)174CTR(Guj)152
..... become operative therefore it appears that the tribunal took into consideration the fact that on acceleration of date of distribution sub clause b providing for giving entire income to settlor would ..... settlor is not alive other contingencies mentioned therein would come into operation hence even on acceleration of date of distribution the same position would come about namely the corpus would go .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial