Skip to content


Accelerate - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: accelerate Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 68 results (0.005 seconds)
Mar 29 2000 (FN)

Santaandnbsp;fe Independent School Dist. Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-29-2000

santa fe independent school dist v doe 530 u s 290 2000 october term 1999 syllabus santa fe independent school...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 31 2000 (HC)

T.V. Narayana, President, Arya Prathinidhi Sabha Vs. G. Devendranath a ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-31-2000

Reported in: 2000(6)ALD496; 2000(6)ALT506

order1 the petitioner herein is the president for a body called arya pratinidhi sabha andhra pradesh which is a society...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 2000 (HC)

Putti Satyanarayana Rao Vs. State

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-28-2000

Reported in: 2001(2)ALD716; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)833; 2001CriLJ1026

order1 heard both sides 2 this petition under section 482 of cr pc seeks quashing of the proceedings in crime...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 2000 (SC)

M/S. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-28-2000

Reported in: [2001(88)FLR387]; (2001)ILLJ150SC; 2000(7)SCALE661

..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... accelerated promotion but not the seniority constitution of india article 16 4a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 2000 (SC)

Union of India Vs. K. M. Shankarappa

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-28-2000

Reported in: 2001(2)ALT34(SC); 2001(127)ELT8(SC); (2001)1MLJ146(SC); 2000(7)SCALE659; [2000]Supp5SCR117; 2001(1)LC197(SC)

..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... accelerated promotion but not the seniority experts sitting as a tribunal and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 2000 (SC)

Hamzabi and ors. Vs. Syed KarimuddIn and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-28-2000

Reported in: (2001)2MLJ27(SC); 2000(7)SCALE651; [2000]Supp5SCR99; 2001(1)LC317(SC)

..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... was not entitled to the seniority on account of his accelerated promotion against the reserved quota and he was only entitled to the ..... accelerated promotion but not the seniority constitution of india article 16 4a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 2000 (HC)

Rajinder Tiku Vs. Union Public Service Commission Delhi Vidyut Board

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-21-2000

Reported in: 2000IIIAD(Delhi)73; 84(2000)DLT369; 2000(53)DRJ110

..... respondent no 3 namely shri subhash chander was promoted as xen in 1988 accordingly any accelerated promotion wrongly made in between at the level of assistant executive engineer specially when no ..... promotions to the next post of superintending engineer no benefit can be taken by these accelerated promotees and while making promotions to the post of superintending engineer their original seniority at .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 2000 (TRI)

Dileep Sharma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jaipur

Decided on: Apr-10-2000

..... to the reserved category candidates cannot be given when they got accelerated promotions due to reservation while on the other hand in ..... when they catch up with the reserved category officials who got accelerated promotion s due to reservation and had reached the level ..... promoted out of turn was not entitled to get benefit of accelerated seniority and was correctly assigned seniority in the cadre of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 2000 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Quinn India Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Dec-22-2000

Reported in: (2001)(74)ECC112

..... the central excise tariff which covered finishing agents dye carriers to accelerate the dyeing or fixing up dye stuffs and other products ..... or surface active preparations and were in fact dye carriers to accelerate the dyeing of leather the organic surface active agents were ..... the following 38 09 3809 00 finishing agents dye carriers to accelerate the dyeing or fixing of dye stuffs and other products .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 2000 (TRI)

Herdillia Unimers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-03-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT504Tri(Mum.)bai

..... order impugned in this appeal 2 heading 3815 90 is for reaction initiators reaction accelerators and catalytic preparations not elsewhere specified or included sub heading 11 12 and 19 ..... precious metal compounds as the active substance this heading covers preparations which initiate or accelerate certain chemical processes products which retard these processes are not included these preparations fall .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //