Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

A B - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 25 2016

B Vs. UC

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-25-2016

1. The present appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred as HMA') has been preferred to assail the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2012, passed in HMA No.251/2010 by Additional District Judge (ADJ),


Aug 21 1992

A. Vs. B.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-21-1992

Reported in: I(1994)DMC238

reference under Section 20 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 for confirmation of the decree of nullity passed by the learned District Judge, Thane.2. The petitioner-husband filed M. J. Petition No. 3758 of 1989 on the Original


Feb 03 1997

B. Vs. S.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-03-1997

Reported in: I(1997)DMC620

got married with the respondent on 16.1.1995 at Vimaiagiri Cathedral Church, Kottayam as per the Christian rites. They belong to Roman Catholic Syrian Christians (Knanaya) Community. Their marriage was arranged by their parents. Petitioner is employed as


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 18 1996

A Vs. B

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-18-1996

Reported in: II(1997)DMC373

K. Narayana Kurup, J.1. This is a petition for nullity of marriage filed by the husband under Section 18 of the Indian Divorce Act.2. The parties belong to the Syrian Christian community.


Oct 20 2000

'A' vs. 'B'

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-20-2000

Reported in: II(2001)DMC35

an arranged marriage. The proposal for the marriage appeared in the matrimonial column of the Malayala Manorama, on behalf of the respondent. This was followed by negotiation among the members of the petitioner's and respondent's families and


Feb 01 1996

A Vs. B

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-01-1996

Reported in: I(1997)DMC34

Criminal Revision No. 27/92 confirming the order of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu, dated January 4, 1992 is being challenged by the petitioners.2. A Criminal case being F.I.R. No. 60/89, was registered at Police Station, Manawa Under


Aug 10 1981

A Vs. B

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-10-1981

Reported in: 1982(1)BomCR236a

A.N. Mody, J.1.This appeal arises out of the matrimonial petition filed by the appellant (original petitioner) in the Bombay City Civil Court at Bombay against his wife, the 1st respondent


Apr 23 1984

A. Vs. B.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Apr-23-1984

Reported in: AIR1985Guj121; (1985)1GLR119

1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Extra Assistant Judge, at Bhavnagar in Regular Civil Appeal No. 37 of 1981, which in turn


Aug 27 1980

A. Vs. B.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Aug-27-1980

Reported in: (1981)22GLR273

A wife having applied under Section 125 of the Cr.P. Code for maintenance from respondent No. 1 husband before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 7th Court, Ahmedabad and having emerged second best in the said proceedings has preferred


Apr 12 1976

A Vs. B

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-12-1976

Reported in: (1978)80BOMLR384

Vaidya, J.1. The above Letters Patent Appeal is filed by the wife, against the judgment, dated September 24, 1975, in F.A. No. 92 of 1975, conforming the judgment


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial