3 2 - Judgment Search Results

Mukand Global Finance Ltd. Vs. Dcit - Range 3(2)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Income-tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the action of Ld Assessing Officer in not setting off loss of Rs. 34,43,668/-, being deemed short term loss, against income under the head "Profits & Gains of Business and Profession. 2.1

Saramma K.K vs the Accommodation Controller Appointed Under Section 3( ...

Court: Kerala

ROY THOMAS (PATHANAMTHITTA) RENJISH S. MENON VRINDA T.S. AISWARYA JAYAPAL RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ACCOMMODATION CONTROLLER APPOINTED UNDER SECTION 3(2) OF THE KERALA BUILDINGS (LEASE AND RENT CONTROL) ACT, 1965/THE TAHSILDAR KOZHENCHERY, MINI CIVIL STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,

M/S Lahmeyer Holding Gmbh Vs. Deputy Director of Income Tax, Circle 3( ...

Court: Delhi

Hydro Corporation Limited (‘JKHCL’) AND Jaypee Venture Private Ltd. (‘JVPL’). The receipts earned from 1st April 2007 to 31st July has been offered to taxation in the hands of the assessee. Receipts earned from 1st August 2007 … of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’) in respect of assessment year 2008-09. It is also directed against the proceedings pursuant to the said notice culminating in the order dated 19.07.2012

idea Cellular Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions of the ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2008)215CTR(Bom)288; [2008]301ITR407(Bom)

petitioner to the re-opening of the assessment.2. The brief chronological facts of the case are as under:(a) On 30.10.2001 the petitioner filed a return in respect of the assessment year 2001-2002 which indicated a loss of Rs.

Ntuc Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd. Vs. the Deputy Director of Inc ...

Court: Mumbai

return has resulted in a short levy of tax. In reply, the Assistant Director of Income Tax (IT) 3(2), Mumbai, stated that the Assessing Officer had no power to make an addition or adjustment in the return

Uti Mutual Fund, Through Its Trustees Uti Trustee Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs ...

Court: Mumbai

by the trust to the CIT-19 for holding the demand in abeyance under Section 220(6) has been rejected. 3. The Petitioner is registered as a mutual fund with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and … the consent of counsel and at their request, the petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2. The Petitioner has sought to challenge principally an order that was passed by the Income Tax Officer –

Date of Decision: 3.2.2014 Vs. Pritam Kaur and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Civil Revision No.6006 of 2013 (O&M) 2 3. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners-contesting defendants have preferred the present petition, invoking the superintendence jurisdiction of this Court under

Date of Decision: 3.2.2014 Vs. Rajwant Kaur @ Rajjo and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.V.K.Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner. Nemo for respondent Nos.2 & 3 despite service. Service of respondent No.1 already dispensed with being ex parte in the trial Court. MEHINDER SINGH

SKR BPO Services (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer-8(3)(2)

Court: Mumbai

stage of admission. 2. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges a notice dated 31st March, 2014 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) passed by the Assessing

Khandelwal Laboratories (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-ta ...

Court: Mumbai

the request of the Counsel, the petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 2. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the attachment of the petitioners' bank … also made a grievance that after attachment an amount of Rs.7,59,185/- from HDFC Bank, Fort, Mumbai and Rs. 34,265/- from State Bank of India, Byculla, Mumbai have been withdrawn without giving any notice to the petitioner before