2003 7 Scc28537 - Judgment Search Results

Shiv Adhar Yadav, Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through the Government ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR657; 2009(111)BomLR1978

time upto december 31 2002 with effect from 1st january 2003 transport vehicles over fifteen years were to be phased out trade or business carried on by him 2 similarly section 74 deals with grant of contract carriage permit sub section 2

Visa Steel Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 107(2009)CLT857; 2009LC(NULL)512

the state government under section 108 of the electricity act 2003 not to enhance the tariff relying upon clause 7 of r m lodha jj fixation orissa service code 1939 rule 74 b promotion government servant by virtue of rule 74 b

Subhash Malik Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2010]187TAXMAN88(All)

10 2003 was served on the appellant on 25 11 2003 where after appellant filed an appeal on 28 11 2003 using the discretion in n balakrishnan v m krishnamurthy 1998 7 scc 123 it was held by this court that section

Pawan Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1239; 2009CriLJ2257; 2009(3)SCALE195; 2009(3)LC1237(SC); 2009(1)LHSC1382; 2009AIRSCW2171; 2009(1)LHSC382

2 a 3 and a 4 i on september 25 2003 at about 8 00 a m victim left her home recorded by the judicial magistrate nainital on october 7 2003 7 the investigating officer on completion of investigation submitted charge sheet

Joint Collector and ors. Vs. P. Harinath Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(4)ALT1

of tahsildar so far as w a no 720 of 2003 is concerned specific written permission of the tahsildar is referred nallolla pantaiah and ors 1998 9 scc 183 jt 1998 7 sc 600 it is evident that during the interregnum several

Narayan S/O Gujabrao Bhoyar Vs. Yeotmal Zilla Parishad Karmachari and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR277; 2009(111)BomLR4211; 2009(6)MhLj500

mah and ors came up for hearing in the year 2003 and the bench dealing with the matter enunciated two principles for an appropriate order for reference to a larger bench 7 at the very threshold we may notice that the view

B. Ramulamma and ors. Vs. Venkatesh, Bus Union, Rep. by A.M. Velu Muda ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT784

anr v jasbir kaur and ors 2003 7 scc 484 2003 6 alt 21 3 dnsc the hon ble supreme court dependants comes to rs 6 000 per month and rs 72 000 per annum rs 6 000 x 12 and after

Jantia Hill Truck Owners Association Vs. Shailang Area Coal Dealer and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC355; 2009(9)SCALE469; (2009)8SCC492:2009AIRSCW4881

also high court of gujarat v gujarat kishan mazdoor panchayat 2003 2scr299 and mahabir vegetable oils p ltd and anr v distinction between an executive order made in terms of articles 73 and 162 of the constitution of india and one made

Mohammed Ashif Gulamkadar Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3582; (2009)3GLR2214

territory of chandigarh as reported in 2003 6 scc 380 2003 cri lj 3070 is relied on by learned app but evidence such evidence must satisfy the following tests scc pp 710 11 para 10 10 1 the circumstances from which an

Cit and anr. Vs. Karnataka Bank Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

19 3 2008 rendered in it appeal no 480 of 2003 c w it appeal no 481 of 2003 7 however categorical finding that the entire amount of rs 3 36 78 394 claimed under section 36 1 vii as a deductible