2002 2 Scc33339 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2002 2 scc33339 Court: chennai Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.261 seconds)V. Chandrasekaran Vs. R. Nagarajan
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-17-2006
Reported in : III(2007)BC699; 2006CriLJ2055
magistrate george town chennai in c c no 2309 of 2002 to undergo sentence of simple imprisonment for one year the the said judgment preferred criminal appeal in c a no 232 of 2005 on the file of the learned vi additional
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Arumugam Vs. the Secretary to Government, Government of Pondicherry ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-27-2006
Reported in : (2006)2MLJ159
and thereafter the petitioner made several representations from 14 11 2002 to 05 11 2004 to appoint the petitioner on compassionate made several representations from 14 11 2002 to 05 11 2004 to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground the petitioner finally
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT. Muthukaruppan Vs. G. Raghavan, Rep. by His Power of Attorney, K. Go ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-19-2006
Reported in : I(2007)BC108; 2006CriLJ1078; 2006(2)KLT996
payee g raghaven in crl o p no 1354 of 2002 the payee g venkatesan in crl o p no 1355 court in ramachandra rao k v state of a p 2005 2 alt607 has held that when section 142 of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Rajasthani JaIn Samaj Educational Trust, Rep. by Its Managing Tru ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Nov-07-2006
Reported in : (2007)1MLJ80
against the order in o s a no 76 of 2002 was also dismissed on 27 1 2003 5 originally the took possession only from the judgment debtors on 29 4 2005 under the mou and the relevant clauses appearing in page
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. Shankar, S/O. A. Raphel Vs. the Registrar General, High Court,
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Nov-04-2006
Reported in : (2006)4MLJ1503
the petitioner participated in the enquiry conducted on 12 6 2002 and produced the certificates in support of his communal status magistrate i class in the tamil nadu judicial service 1999 2000 and 2000 2001 with appropriate seniority as per law 2
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Jagannathan and Sons Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer,
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Nov-15-2006
Reported in : (2007)7VST57(Mad)
as it stood from 1 4 1973 to 10 5 2002 2 a notwithstanding anything contained in sub section 1 a 20 for the foregoing reasons except wp no 4883 of 2005 all the writ petitions are dismissed no costs consequently all
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKamireddi Sattiaraju and Kamireddi Mangayamma (Died) Vs. Kandamuri Boo ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-21-2006
Reported in : (2007)1MLJ499
air1996sc2814 lourdu mari david v louis chinnaya arogiaswamy and viii 2002 2 l w 399 a c arulappan v smt ahalya 4 authorities were directed to modify form b sections 5a 2 hearing of objectors held it is mandatory and making a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOm Sakthi Renergies Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director Mr. M. Jaya ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-07-2006
Reported in : 2006(2)ARBLR186(Madras); 2006(2)CTC161; (2006)1MLJ657
i t i ltd v siemens public communications network ltd 2002 3scr1122 a two judge bench of the supreme court has in ganesh benzoplast ltd mumbai v sundaram finance ltd chennai 2002 2 ctc 238 we have carefully analysed the said judgment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Insurance Company Limited Vs. Arumugham,
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-24-2006
Reported in : 2006(2)CTC368; (2006)2MLJ564
introducing a broader construction 18 in the judgment reported in 2002 supp2scr324 union of india and anr v hansoli devi and liability the premium paid was 1 basic premium rs 120 2 add for legal ability to passengers asper endt 12 rs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDynasty Developers Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Jumbo World Holdings Ltd. an ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-01-2006
Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR9(Madras)
v trisuns chemical industries ltd 2002 2 mh lj 242 2002 2 arb lr 432 bom in support of his submissions 05 2006 and undertook to return the advance of rs 25 crores as stipulated in clause 12 3 of the agreement
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT