Skip to content

Did you mean: 2002 2 sick?


2002 2 Scc33339 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: 2002 2 scc33339 Page 1 of about 301 results (2.298 seconds)
Nov 18 2021 (SC)

National Confederation Of Officers Association Of Central Public Secto ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... for the two judge bench held 27 hpcl 28 bpcl 29 2002 2 scc33339 part d 12 in order to interpret the enactments in question ..... shareholding of the union government was divested initially in 1991 2 and subsequently in 2002 after the disinvestment of 26 per cent of the ..... writ petition instituted by maton mines mazdoor sangh ii at the time of privatization in 2002 a contract was entered into in the form .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 14 2008 (SC)

Ludhiana Improvement Trust and anr. Vs. Today Homes and Infrastructure ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2009SC246; 2008(4)AWC4025(SC); (2009)2MLJ1073(SC); 2008(13)SCALE222:2008AIRSCW7208:2008(6)LHSC4046.

railway corporation limited and anr v rani construction private limited 2002 1scr728 which was followed in hindustan petroleum corporation ltd v respondent no 1 accordingly filed arbitration petition no 263 of 2006 under section 11 6 of the 1996 act for appointment

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 2006 (SC)

Devendra Kumar Singh Vs. Administrator, Bihar Coop. Mkt. Un. Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2006)IIILLJ9SC; (2006)3MLJ311(SC); 2006(4)SCALE577; (2006)11SCC144; 2007(1)SLJ162(SC)

it however appears that by an order dated 29 4 2002 a division bench of this court directed the state of accordingly this writ petition is allowed with cost of rs 2000 to be paid by the head of the organisation namely

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 23 2013 (HC)

M/S.Madhav Structural Engineering Ltd. Vs. the Maharashtra State Road ...

Court : Mumbai

in c a no 6527 2001 decided on 13 3 2002 where in while dealing with a similar argument arising out july 2008 this court dismissed arbitration appeal no 5 of 2008 filed by the petitioner under section 37 of the act

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 28 2016 (HC)

Shivappa and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by it Secretary a ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

towards thirthahalli and the project was commenced in the year 2002 and the date of completion of the project is 1 cr 19 2013 14 respectively issued by the respondent no 2 and 3 so far as petitioner s land is concerned

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 19 2014 (TRI)

Heights Trade Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Uco Bank

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

shoes ltd and anr v corporation bank and anr ii 2002 cpj 7 sc iv 2002 slt 235 2002 10 scc 7 sc iv 2002 slt 235 2002 10 scc 358 21 i was also able to locate a few authorities in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 2012 (TRI)

Umesh Prakash and Another Vs. State Bank of India Hazratganj Lucknow, ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

ram nath sahu and others v gobardhan sao and others 2002 2 slt 240 referred para 5 6 vedabai vaijayantabai baburao sc relied para 16 comparative citations 2012 2 cpr 239 2012 2 cpj 87

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 2014 (HC)

Jivaji Framroze Tarachand (since deceased) through his Lrs. and Others ...

Court : Mumbai

of the learned counsel for the defendants that up to 2002 she was not able to read or write or speak was as per his desire in reply to question no 201 when asked whether mr pithawalla asked that question before or

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2016 (HC)

Anil (Vidyarthi) and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra Represented by t ...

Court : Mumbai

city of ulhasnagar and ors writ petition no 5665 of 2002 2 sharanbasappa rachappa khambad vs state of maharashtra and ors corrupt practices at the election in the municipal councils act 21 1 no election or nomination of a councillor may be

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 2013 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. Prakash Vinayakrao Shingnapur ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

6 ram anup singh and others vs state of bihar 2002 6 scc 686 7 prakash dhawal khairnar patil vs state particularly cut marks on clothes and injury nos 24 to 27 and 37 42 43 and 45 mentioned in column 17

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //