1986 2 Scc23723 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1986 2 scc23723 Court: mumbai Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.1 seconds)Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. J.K. Chemicals Limited, a Company ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-08-2004
Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR760; 2004(2)BomCR484; [2004(101)FLR90]; (2004)IILLJ798Bom
p bhandari v indian tourism development corporation ltd and ors 1986 iillj509sc wherein it was held in the facts and circumstances orders the same clearly amounted to a mis conduct dated 25th june 2003 wherein this court has clearly come to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.R. Fernandes Vs. Air India Ltd. and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-07-2004
Reported in : (2004)106BOMLR289
corporation ltd and anr v brojo nath ganguly and anr 1986 lab i c 1312 1986 ii l l j 133 well as the petitioner in the said writ petition no 2578 of 2003 and that the petitioner had failed to prove
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-24-2004
Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98
1978 and the national security guard act 1986 47 of 1986 2 for the removal of doubts it is hereby declared submissions filed by the respondents it is stated in para 2 as under the purported grounds raised by the petitioner in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCit Vs. Supreme Graphics Creations (P) Ltd. and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-06-2004
Reported in : (2005)197CTR(Bom)668
court in the case of empire industries ltd v uoi 1986 162itr846 sc laminated packings p ltd v collector of central j this appeal arises from the order dated 28 9 2001 passed by the income tax appellate tribunal panaji by allowing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSukhdeo Parashramji Bhugul (Dr.) Vs. Wamanrao Nagorao Charhat
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-16-2004
Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR645; 2004(3)MhLj724
be allowed and the judgment and decree dated 30 10 1986 passed by the trial court was set aside and instead then was in krishnarao v mahadeorao 1953 n l j 230 wherein it has been observed as under 3 the trial
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCouncil of the Institute of the Chartered Accountants of India Vs. U.V ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-11-2004
Reported in : [2005(104)FLR1075]; (2005)IILLJ8Bom; 2005(1)MhLj619
out that the respondent had certified that during the period 1986 87 the said unit had consumed 170 mts of raw the above statement of case to this court under section 21 5 of the act with a recommendation that the name
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCouncil of the Icai Vs. U.V. Karkhanis
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-11-2004
Reported in : [2004]140TAXMAN684(Bom)
out that the respondent had certified that during the period 1986 87 the said units had consumed 170 mts of raw of the second schedule to the act read with sections 21 22 of the act the council concurred with the report
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDevendra Pandurang Pandore Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chiplun Mu ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-09-2004
Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR37; [2005(104)FLR536]; 2005(1)MhLj104
1 d of the act by award dated 28th february 1986 the petitioner was denied the benefit of reinstatement with continuity terminated non compliance of the provisions of sections 25f and 25g petitioner entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and full
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrakash Mohanlal Chopda Vs. Yalaji Rahuji Ghule and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-14-2004
Reported in : 2005(1)MhLj759
the accident in question took place on 6th of may 1986 at about 1 00 p m near mile stone no 86 with more emphasis on judgment paragraph nos 12 to 28 wherein the learned judge has considered the aspect of rashness
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrabhakar Madhavrao Mule Vs. Bhagwan Mitharam Choudhari
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-24-2004
Reported in : 2004(5)BomCR568; 2004(2)MhLj1058
chaturvedi 2002 supp1scr469 section 13 of the consumer protection act 1986 speaks about procedure on receipt of complaint on receipt of regular civil suit nos 77 of 2003 and 76 of 2003 were duly served on the original defendant prabhakar mule petitioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT