1986 1 Scc26444 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1986 1 scc26444 Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.185 seconds)Madhu Ashok Kapur and Others Vs. Rana Kapoor and Others
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-24-2014
kerala page 254 maharaja exports vs apparels exports promotion council 1986 60 comp cases 353 delhi page 361 berar trading co a challenge to the appointment of defendant nos 7 to 12 as directors is not impliedly barred under the act 1956
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.A. Vitol Vs. Bhatia International Limited
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-15-2014
vol 88 pg 228 lic of india vs escorts ltd 1986 1 scc 264 director of enforcement vs mctm corporation pvt analogues to section 16 of fera which runs thus 16 duty of persons entitled to receive foreign exchange etc
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDakshini Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd., Through Its Managing Directo ...
Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
available to him before the appropriate forum consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g section 21 b case referred u dismissed appeal as it was filed with a delay of 110 days as well on merits 3 heard learned counsel for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBudha Ganesh Vs. New India Insurance Company Ltd. Through Divisional O ...
Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : Jan-21-2014
order under section 21 b of the consumer protection act 1986 this meritless revision petition therefore must be dismissed and it 9 2006 but the fir came to be filed on 13 9 2006 and the insurance company was intimated about the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBudha Ganesh Vs. New India Insurance Company Ltd. Through Divisional O ...
Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : Jan-21-2014
shall be no order as to costs consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g section 21 b case referred 1 the period of insurance however the fir was filed on 13 9 2006 and the insurance company was informed on 19
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmitabh Doss, Adnoc-d Vs. Ideal Real Estates Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : Jan-10-2014
their jurisdiction from the provisions under the consumer protection act 1986 and not from any act of the parties 9 per by the present appellant before the state commission on 29 11 2010 the matter went to the high court of calcutta
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Girja Kotha Koal, Gynaecologist Clinic at Choudhary Surgreev Singh ...
Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
filed under section 21 b of the consumer protection act 1986 against the impugned order dated 15 01 2008 passed by saying that the doctor had prescribed medicines on 20 12 1999 and 4 1 2000 learned counsel has also drawn our
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamesh Kumar Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited and Others
Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla
Decided on : Feb-24-2014
parties free of cost as per rules consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g section 15 cases referred 1 national rules consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g section 15 cases referred 1 national insurance company limited v nitin khandelwal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnil Hunjan Vs. Country Club (India) Limited and Others
Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
Decided on : Jan-21-2014
be consigned to record room after completion consumer protection act 1986 euro rdquo section 2 1 g section 2 1 and the procedure for booking online to book your holidays 15 there is force in the averment of the respondents opposite
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Avery India Limited Vs. M/S. Kaybee Sulphates Limited, Represente ...
Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on : Jan-03-2014
p under section 21 b of the consumer protection act 1986 for short act against order dated 30 10 2007 passed of 14 no order as to cost consumer protection act 1986 section 21 b case referred laxmi engineering works v psg
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT