1986 1 Scc26444 - Judgment Search Results

National Confederation Of Officers Association Of Central Public Secto ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the company was not liable to be questioned on any of 30 1986 1 scc26444 part e the grounds set out in the writ petition this ..... 21 forward construction co v prabhat mandal regd 1986 1 scc100 three judge bench 22 1989 supp 1 scc50425 part c was a final order in ..... bench central inland water transport corporation limited v brojo nath ganguly 1986 3 scc156 two judge bench 32 acb 45 part e preliminary .....

Annapoorna Agencies (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2004]141TAXMAN542(Delhi)

that since the transaction by the agreement dated 30 9 1986 was covered by the provisions of section 269ab of the first floor in block of 9 prithvi road new delhi 110 001 total consideration fixed was rs 11 36 000 which

Sunrise Associates Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2000)10SCC420

correctness of the decision in h anraj case reported in 1986 1 scc 414 1986 scc tax 190 doubted the judgment this court in h anraj v govt of t n 1 it was held that the entire consideration paid for the

Rajiv Kochar Vs. R.S. Sharma and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2000(10)SC449; (2002)9SCC624

laid down the correct law held in h anraj case 1986 1 scc 414 it was held that a sale of the cases were booked i e the period from december 1988 to january 1993 and to and to obtain the clients

Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangaba ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1997(92)ELT23(SC); JT1997(10)SC737; (1997)9SCC681

schedule to the central excise tariff act 1985 5 of 1986 from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon 90 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act 1985 case to be exempted from the whole of the duty

P.K. Shaji @ Thammanam Shaji Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC100; 2005(2)ALD(Cri)955; 2005(85)DRJ486; [2006(1)JCR133(SC)]; JT2005(9)SC481; 2005(4)KLT856(SC); 2006(I)OLR(SC)76; (2005)13SCC283; 2006(1)LC33(SC)

judge decision in h anraj v government of t n 1986 1 scc 414 holding otherwise had not laid down the cancel bail delhi sales tax act 1975 sections 2 g 1 3 4 b n agrawal g s singhvi aftab alam

C. Rangaswamaiah and Others Vs. Karnataka Lokayukta and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2496; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)400; 1998(4)ALLMR(SC)372; JT1998(5)SC64; 1998(4)SCALE266; (1998)6SCC66; [1998]3SCR837

17 of that act and the notification dated 26 5 1986 issued under section 2 s of the crpc designating all director general of police newly attached w e f 21 11 92 to the bureau of investigation of lokayukta by way

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Harinder Pal Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC447; 2006(1)ALT7(SC); 2006(1)AWC26(SC); JT2005(9)SC280; (2005)12SCC564

laid down the correct law held in h anraj case 1986 1 scc 414 it was held that a sale of 25 000 per acre for chahi nehri lands ii rs 18 000 per acre for sarani lands and iii rs 8000

Joint Commnissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Admini ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC104; JT2005(10)SC288; (2006)1SCC257

laid down the correct law held in h anraj case 1986 1 scc 414 it was held that a sale of and export policy for the period april 1988 to march 1991 issued under the imports and exports control act 1947 those

Babubhai Odhavji Patel, Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC102; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)490; 2005(103)ECC85; (2006)1GLR691; [2006(1)JCR17(SC)]; JT2005(9)SC410; 2005(4)KLT779(SC); RLW2006(1)SC37; (2005)8SCC725; 2006(1)LC20(SC)

that the ratio of the decision in h anraj case 1986 1 scc 414 fully supported the contention of the states laid down the correct law held in h anraj case 1986 1 scc 414 it was held that a sale of