1974 2 Scc 539 - Judgment Search Results

Niraj Upadhyaya and Others Vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad a ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2108; (2000)2UPLBEC1758

..... executive engineer association v state of gujarat and others 1994 supp 2 scc 591 was heavily relied on for the respondents to shore ..... of the rajasthan university teachers and officers selection for appointment act 1974 was required to prepare to the extent of 50 per ..... the existing officers in the service was reported to be 539 including 18 officers recommended for appointment in the recruitment year .....

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Navinchandra L. Mandavia and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)IIILLJ14Guj

court bhavnagar in reference no 183 of 1993 old no 209 of 1990 dated february 27 1996 is challenged wherein the v n sundara money air 1976 sc 1111 1976 1 scc 822 1976 i llj 478 a three judge bench of 1986 sc 458 1985 4 scc 71 1985 ii llj 539 the relevant observation of the above referred case of the

Public Services Tribunal Bar Association Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2000)3UPLBEC2553

the said expression has been construed in relation to article 217 of the constitution in other words the said expression would case of s p gupta v union of india 1981 scc supp 87 further we find that directly no personal interest khare v state of u p reported in 1989 scd 539 observed as under the adjudication involving the question of interpretation

Smt. Namita Paul Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Guwahati

v state of tamil nadu 1974 2 scr 348 air 1974 sc 555 and maneka gandhi v union of india 1978 p air 1991 sc 537 at pages 549 550 paras 22 and 23 the supreme court held thus 22 there is in mahabir auto stores v indian oil corporation 1990 3 scc 752 para 20 5 in radhakrishna agarwal v state of

Jag Mohan Mehrotra and ors. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. a ...

Court : Patna

date of commencement of the act i e march 13 1974 sections 5 and 7 of the act are relevant in of litigants bognor regis urban district council v campion 1972 2 all er 61 qbd the jurisdiction to award remedies in in rohtas industries ltd v rohtas industries staff union 1976 scc 82 air 1976 sc 425 49 fjr 313 while dealing

State of Gujarat Vs. Balubhai Arjanbhai

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)3GLR1934

higher authorities and the last order was dated september 10 1974 therefore according to the learned a g p the operation time in view of art 100 of the limitation act 2 whether the lower courts were right in law to declare and additional evidence as well state of maharashtra 1999 7 scc 739 the supreme court has clearly and categorically observed that

israil @ Israr Pahelvan Nazirahmed Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2209; (2001)1GLR306

the contention with regard to section 5a of cofeposa act 1974 which is equivalent to section 6 of the act that has filed his additional affidavit in reply on 28th august 2000 in reply to affidavit in rejoinder dt 20th june 2000 bham v state of maharashtra ors reported in 1999 6 scc 593 the words grounds used in clause 5 of article

Alok Prasad Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

the supreme court reported in 1973 2 scc 836 air 1974 sc 87 union of india v m l capoor paragraph of the income tax officer bettiah it was rs 11 210 per annum his mother is entitled to one third of the judgment of the supreme court reported in 1996 10 scc 405 air 1997 sc 66 rajasthan co operative dairy federation

Bobby Alias Premveer and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4125

1974 and came into force w e f 1 4 1974 it has completely a new section numbered as section 257 police custody from time to time this order dated 9 2 1995 the remand order was challenged in the cited case hussainara khatoon v home secretary state of bihar 1980 1 scc 81 air 1979 sc 1360 1979 cri lj 1036 a

T. Phungzathang Vs. Hangkhanlian and ors.

Court : Guwahati

see satya narainv dhuja ram 1974 4 scc 237 air 1974 sc 1185 m karunanidhi v dr hv handa 1983 2 andduly verified before the prescribed authority fir that purpose form 25 prescribed by section 83 requires verification before prescribed authority the court in mahendra pal v ram dass malanger 2000 1 scc 261 for the proposition that dismissal of the election petition