1974 2 Scc 539 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1974 2 scc 539 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.967 seconds)T.K. Shanmugam Secretary, C.P.I. (M) North Chennai District Committee, ...
Court : Chennai
..... supreme court in the case of pandia nadar vs state of tamil nadu reported in 1974 2 scc 539 and by virtue of the provisions of the encroachment act the government is entitled to ..... defence fund vs union of india reported in 1997 3 scc 549 4 pandia nadar vs state of tamil nadu reported in 1974 2 scc 539 5 l krishnan vs state of tamil nadu reported .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajendra Prasad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1979SC916; 1979CriLJ792; (1979)3SCC646; [1979]3SCR78
death sentence may be called for 160f h ediga anamma 1974 4 s c c 443 bishan das ors 1975 3 murder a view which the continuance in force of section 2 of the offences against the person law suggests is accepted 4 scc 443 sunil batra v delhi admn 1978 4 scc 494 at 569 572 referred to capital punishment in india
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJodhpur Chartered Accountants Society and anr. Vs. Union of India and ...
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (2002)176CTR(Raj)177
taken in state of gujarat v sri ambika mills ltd 1974 3scr760 in ito v section n takim roy rymbai 1976 v union of india 2001 21 dtc 190 guj hc 2001 252 itr 53 guj all india federation of tax practitioners hosiery mills p ltd v state of rajasthan 1970 2 scc 26 state of gujarat v sri ambika mills ltd 1974
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodavari Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Kepargaon Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Sabha, Sa ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1961SC1016; [1961(2)FLR180]; (1961)ILLJ313SC; [1961]3SCR342
dismissed bombay industrial relations act 1947 ss 3 18 42 2 73 a item 2 sch 11 item 6 sch iii
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKumari Sehej Gupta and anr. Vs Shri M.L. Gupta and ors.
Court : Delhi
him on 29 06 05 by receipt no 661010 c 215 maker chamber mumbai it was purchased by the grandfather on stated in d s lakshmaiah v l balasubramanyam 2003 1 scc 310 in the following words 18 the legal principle therefore
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Sangeeta Bansal
Court : Delhi
applicant was put under suspension vide order dated 3 12 2007 after discussing the facts of the case and returning a on g j fernandez v state of karnataka 1990 2 scc 488 para 18 whether a condition is essential or collateral
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTO.R.O.M. Sp. (Firm) Vs. Nagappa Chettiar
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR440
no 2 rs 15 700 were credited to defendant no 2 s overdraft account with defendant no 1 and the balance
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. Gopinath Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by Secretary to Governm ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 1995Supp(3)SCC305
the note and its proviso in the schedule to rule 2 of the karnataka forest department services recruitment rules 1987 mdash
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Kewal Kishan Vs M/S. Khurana Kaj House.
Court : Delhi
has been filed by petitioner against order dated 12th may 2010 passed by senior civil judge new delhi vide which application on g j fernandez v state of karnataka 1990 2 scc 488 para 18 whether a condition is essential or collateral
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohd. Usman @ Haji Vs Commissioner of Police and ors.
Court : Delhi
has been a contravention of the provisions of section 5 2 of the act it shall set aside the order under union for civil liberties v union of india 1997 1 scc 301 hereafter the pucl case 3 respondent nos 1 to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT