1922 - Judgment Search Results

Cr.W.P. 1922 of 2012 Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Cr.W.P.1922 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.W.P.1922 of 2012 Date of decision:26.2.2013 Gajjan Singh .petitioner vs State of Punjab and ors ..respondent Present Mr.CS Rana, Advocate. Mr.AS...

Crl.Appeal No.S-1922 Sb of 2002 (Oandm) Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Crl.Appeal not S-1922 SB o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Appeal not S-1922 SB of 2002 (O&M) Date of decision:22. 03.2013 Gurnam Singh and others ..Appellants Versus State of Punjab ..Respondents...

In Re: the Indian Income-tax Act, Xi of 1922

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 157Ind.Cas.656

negative. Costs Rs. 250 to the assessee.Ramesam, J.5. I agree.King, J.6. I agree. Income Tax Act (XI of 1922), Section 4(3) (viii) - Business--Profit form isolated transaction of speculation not connected with business--Exemption from tax--Casual and non-recurring

In Re: the Indian Income Tax Act Xi of 1922

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 168Ind.Cas.13

old business--Assessment as successor--Legality--Firm--Partnership between firm and individuals--Share of members of firm not specified--Registration--Permissibility--Income Tax Act (XI of 1922), Sections 26 (2), 26-A. -

In Re: the Indian Income Tax Act 1922 ; in Re: the Western Indian Turf ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1926Bom539

Macleod, C.J.1. This is a reference by the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 66(2) of Act XI of 1922. The Commissioner says that the Western India Turf Club was, in the past, being assessed to super-tax on

In Re: Section 45, Specific Relief Act, 1877, Section 66 of the Income ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1925Mad157; 85Ind.Cas.478

for that purpose.4. Costs of this application will abide, and follow the result. Income Tax Act (XI of 1922), Sections 10(2)(7),(9),66 - Expenditure on renewal of parts of car, nature of--'Obsolete,' meaning of--Total destruction of machinery, whether

The Hon'ble Rai Bahadur Pandit Sadanand Pandey Vs. Sheikh Tufail Ahmad ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1923All115; 79Ind.Cas.486

Matched in: Parties The Hon'ble Rai Bahadur Pandit Sadanand Pandey Vs. Sheikh Tufail Ahmad and Anr. (02.11.1922 - ALLHC)

Kachinamthodi Parambil Saharabi Vs. Kachinamthodi Puthia Purayil Seema ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1923)44MLJ141

Matched in: Parties Kachinamthodi Parambil Saharabi Vs. Kachinamthodi Puthia Purayil Seemamutti's son Ali and six Ors. (26.09.1922 - MADHC)

Hota Veerabhadrayya and Ors. Vs. the Hon'ble Sri Rajah Kocherla Kota R ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1923Mad674; 73Ind.Cas.66

in Second Appeal No. n of 1904 the erection of a permanent dam having been constructed prior to 1922, no right to such a dam can have been acquired by prescription. The user proved is only the

Hon'ble Raja Reshee Case Law, C.i.E. Vs. Bhuban Mohan Pal and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 72Ind.Cas.1047

1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff landlord in a suit under Section 106, Bengal Tenancy Act, for correction of, an entry made in the Record of Rights. In the Record of Rights the defendant...