10 10 - Judgment Search Results
X X X X vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-23-2024
CRL.REVISION PETITION NO. 479 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07.04.2022 IN CMP NO.155 OF 2022 IN SC 1053 OF 2020 OF SPECIAL COURT UNDER POCSO ACT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (CRIME NO.690 OF 2019 OF NEYYARDAM POLICE STATION) REVISION
X X X vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-03-2023
THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1945 CRIME NO.705/2023 OF Mavelikkara Police Station, Alappuzha PETITIONER/ACCUSED: X X X AGED 67 YEARS X X X, PIN - 690101 BY ADVS. S.K.SAJI MAYAMOL T.S. G.R.MANJU RESPONDENTS/STATE
XXXX, Represented by Father X X X XX vs State Police Chief
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-25-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 3RD SRAVANA, 1946 WP(CRL.) NO. 626 OF 2024 CRIME NO.419/2024 OF ERATTUPETTAH POLICE STATION,...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Date of Decision: 10.10.2013 Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22683 of 2013 Date of decision: 10.10.2013 Daljit Kaur ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present: Mr.R.K.Arora,
Date of Decision: 10.10.2013 Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-10-2013
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6761 of 2011 Date of decision: 10.10.2013 Gagandeep ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present: Mr.S.S.Rana, Advocate
Hindustan Organic Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Organic Chemicals Ltd. ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-10-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)BomCR225; (2008)110BOMLR3517
this Court in the case of National Building Construction Corporation v. Rampal Singh and Anr. 1997 2 CLR 1025. The learned Counsel points out that the judgment of the Supreme Court in Air India Statutory Corporation etc.
insurance Employees' Association Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of Ind ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-10-1994
Reported in: (1995)97BOMLR128; [1995(70)FLR851]; (1998)IIILLJ209Bom; 1995(1)MhLj266
standing orders. In reply to the show cause notice, the respondent worker admitted that he had completed the 10th Standard and pleaded for sympathy. The appellant Company terminated the services of the workman for fraudulent misrepresentation. The
Self-Employed Women's Association (Sewa) and Anr. Vs. Commissioner of ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-10-1997
Reported in: (1999)1GLR399
No. 89 of 1982 and quash the prosecutions initiated against vegetable vendors in various complaints registered under Sections 102 and 117 of the Bombay Police Act. In the Misc. Criminal Application No. 2875 of 1987, prayer is
Surjit Singh Vs. Mohinder Pal Singh and ors. ( 10.10.1986 - Phhc)
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-10-1986
Reported in: AIR1988P& H156
granted to the plaintiffs beyond the permissible area as defined in the Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972 ? 10. Whether the defendants have made improvements on the suit land after sale '? If so, to what extent
Central India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer 'A' Ward and A ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-10-1960
Reported in: AIR1962MP336
arise under the same head, of course the loss can be deducted but that is done under Section 10 and not under Section 24(1)...... In the present case, the loss is computed by striking a balance in
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free