Rajasthan Court August 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhanwar Lal Acharya Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-10-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)WLN505
Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the initiation of the departmental inquiry against the petitioner by issuing charge-sheet (Annex.14). As per the charge level against the petitioner, he is facing inquiry for purchase of commodities, which were already expired. The amount of purchase has been shown as Rs. 12,12,490/- as per the charge No. 1. Another charge is that petitioner purchased the pesticides and medicines of higher price causing loss to the society of Rs. 23,224.43 and third charge is that the petitioner embezzled Rs. 1440/-.3. The contention of the petitioner is that a regular inquiry was conducted under Section 57(1) of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 2001) by the Registrar, Co-operative Societies and in that inquiry, the petitioner was exonerated from the same charges vide order dt. 29.09.2008, which was communicated to the petitioner on 13.10...
Fateh Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-08-2009
Reported in: 2009(2)WLN387
Gopal Krishan Vyas, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction to the respondents to declare that the petitioner is entitled to get the amount of all the retiral benefits of pension, gratuity, commutation, State Insurance and G.P.F. Etc. for the entire period of service from 02.02.1970 to 30.11.2004 without any deduction and objection, calculated immediately on his retirement on 30.11.2004 on the basis of the last pay drawn. It is further prayed that the respondents may be directed to pay withheld amount towards gratuity and the amount of commutation etc. with arrears arising out of retiral benefits and interest @ 12% on the benefits from the date they became payable till the date of actual payment.2. Brief facts of the case are that initially the petitioner was appointed on 02.02.1970 as Police Constable in the R.A.C., 6th Battalion. Later on, after adjudging the suitability of the petitioner for the post of Constable Driver, he was selected and given posting ...
Hari Krishan Vs. Ramji
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-06-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)WLN284
Vineet Kothari, J.1. Heard learned Counsels.2. This appeal is directed against the MACT Award dt. 18.11.1996 deciding Claim Case No. 152/96. 3. The injured Hari Krishan Patel, a Patwari, was driving his Motor Cycle No. RJ-12-3878 and was hit by another Motor Cycle driven by respondent Ramji, who according to injured claimant was under the influence of liquor and driving the Motor Cycle in rash and negligent manner and hit the claimant by coming from wrong side of the road. On account of the said accident, the injured claimant suffered injury on his left eye and his vision of left eye was also reduced.4. Learned Counsel for the appellant claimant submits that on account of said accident the injured claimant spent Rs. 30,000/- on his medical treatment and incidental travelling to various places in Gujarat, whereas, the learned Tribunal has awarded only Rs. 16,500/- on account of medical expenses and Rs. 11,000/- towards incidental travelling and Rs. 5500/- on account of mental harassment...
Neki Ram Vs. Rajendra Kumar and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-06-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)WLN482
G.S. Sarraf, J.1. The claimant appellant has filed this appeal against the award passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Neem-ka-Thana, district Sikar in Motor Accident Claim No. 50/91.2. It is not necessary to narrate the entire facts as the only question before me is whether the compensation awarded in favour of the claimant appellant is just and reasonable. 3. One Pema Ram who is the father of the claimant appellant Neki Ram died in an accident on 17.02.1991. Admittedly the deceased was 55 years of age at the time of the accident. Learned Tribunal assessed the income of the deceased as Rs. 2400/- per month and after deducting 1/3 of it on account of personal expenses of the deceased awarded Rs. 1600X12X3=Rs.57,600/- for the loss of income and after adding Rs. 10,000/- for pain and suffering passed a total award of Rs. 67,600/- in favour of the claimant appellant.4. Heard learned Counsels for the parties.5. Learned Counsel for the claimant appellant has submitted that the multiplier...
Jamana Suthar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-06-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)WLN561
Dinesh Maheshwari, J.1. Having given a very anxious consideration to this matter, this Court finds itself unable to issue mandamus as prayed for.2. The petitioner is said to be a minor married girl residing with her father but who was allegedly kidnapped on 02.01.2009 and a report in that regard was lodged by her father at Police Station, Sri Dungargarh where FIR No. 22/2009 was registered for the offences under Sections 363, 366 and 120B IPC. The petitioner's father also filed a Habeas Corpus Petition bearing No. 1311/2009 to this Court alleging inaction on the part of the police authorities in recovering the petitioner from the illegal detention of the accused Shanker Lal. It is borne out from the record that the petitioner was allegedly recovered by the police in the last week of May 2009 from the State of Karanataka and was produced before the Judicial Magistrate and her statements were recorded on 02.06.2009 wherein she alleged kidnapping by three named accused persons and also st...
State Vs. Goru and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-06-2009
Reported in: RLW2010(1)Raj631
A.M. Kapadia, J.1. These two appeals arise out of a judgment and order dated January 17, 1986 rendered by learned Sessions Judge, Bhilwara in Sessions Case No. 28 of 1985 by which the appellants of Criminal Appeal No. 45 of 1986, who are original accused No. 1 Goru and original accused No. 3 Hajari (A/1 & A/3' for short) of Criminal Appeal No. 45 of 1986 came to be convicted of the offences under Sections 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short) and A-1 Goru Ram has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, rigorous imprisonment for three months whereas A-3 Hajari, instead of sentencing at once was accorded benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act as he was less than 21 years of age at the time of commission of offence. Rest of the two accused A-2 Jagdish and A-4 Ramkishan alongwith above two accused namely, A-1 Goru Ram and A-3 Hajari who are respondents in Criminal Appeal No. 185 of 1...
Jeev Kanwar (Smt.) Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-04-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)WLN424
N.P. Gupta, J.1. These four appeals arise out of common judgment of the learned Single Judge. As a matter of fact five appeals were filed out of which one Appeal No. 568 is reported to have been compromised between the parties, and accordingly it was withdrawn somewhere in 1998, and these four appeals survive.2. For properly understanding the controversy we may refer to the genealogy as given by Mr. Purohit that common ancestor was one Sher Singh, he had two sons being Jabbar Singh and Vijay Singh. Vijay Singh is said to have expired, and is alleged to have been survived by son Bhawani Singh.3. The appellants claim to be purchaser from Bhawani Singh, and claimed to have purchased various parcels of land by registered sale deed some-wherein March, 1968. It is a different story that the appellants are near and/or distant relations of Bhawani Singh.4. The controversy arose in the circumstances that ceiling proceedings were initiated separately against Jabbar Singh and Bhawani Singh. Proce...
In Re: Esl India Ltd.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-04-2009
Reported in: RLW2010(1)Raj93; [2009]95SCL133(Raj)
ORDERPrakash Tatia, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.2. The applicant-ESL India Limited, a company incorporated and registered under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956, has submitted this application under Sections 391-394 of the Act. The applicant company has set up a R&D; and IT based solution providing undertaking at Udaipur and is supporting the transferee-company as a technology & R&D; support provider in the manufacturing of state-of the art Solid State Electronic Energy Meters and Allied Products to cater to single phase, LT and HT customers. The applicant-company wants to amalgamate and merge with the transferee-company - Secure Meters Limited which is also a company registered under the provisions of Companies Act. The contention of the applicant/transferor-company is that it is 100 per cent subsidiary company of transferee-company.3. The applicant-company has authorised share capital as on 31-3-2009 of Rs. 50 lakhs divided into 5 lakhs equity shares of Rs. 10 ...
Girdhari Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-04-2009
Reported in: RLW2010(1)Raj151
Deo Narayan Thanvi, J.1. By this instant appeal filed Under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused-appellants Girdhari Singh and Onkar Singh have challenged their conviction and sentenced recorded Under Section 302 IPC by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajsamand vide his judgment dated 11.10.1985, whereby they have been convicted Under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default, to further undergo three months S.I.2. Facts leading to this appeal are that on 28.5.84, one Dhanna S/o Uda Bheel resident of village Bherudasji-ka-Kheda made an oral report before Sangram Singh, ASI, Police Station, Amet that when he was grazing the cattle in the field of Nathu Bheel, he saw certain sky birds like crows and eagles were falling on the land. When he went there, he noticed a dead body of unknown person. Upon this report, the police registered a case and conducted enquiry Under Section 174 Cr. P. C. The ...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Bidami and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-03-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(4)Raj3226; 2009(3)WLN420
Vineet Kothari, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant - Insurance Company under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 aggrieved by the award of the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Jodhpur dtd.31.3.2008 in claim Case No. 11/2006.2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that the husband of the respondent No. 1 Smt. Badami, namely, Pappu Ram while driving Truck No. RJ-19/1G-3189 coming from Mumbai to Jodhpur in the night between 29.7.2003 and 30.7.2003, collided with Trailer No. HR-55-0707 and in the said accident Pappu Ram lost his life. The wife of the said deceased Pappu Ram, namely, Smt. Bidami Bai and his children Mamta, Rekha and Munna initially filed claim case No. 103/2005 on 16.5.2005 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jodhpur and the said claim was awarded on 30.11.2005 and a sum of Rs. 4,60,333/-was paid to the claimants for the said death, in January, 2006. Thereafter somewhere in June, 2006, it appears that the same claimants filed pr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »