Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Neki Ram Vs. Rajendra Kumar and ors.

Neki Ram vs Rajendra Kumar and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Aug 06, 2009
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/769592

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 168-Accident claim-Multiplier applicable-To a person aged 55 who died in accident, the appropriate multiplier will be 8 and not 3-Thus computed compensation enhanced from Rs. 67,600/- to Rs. 1,66,000/- with interest. -

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Neki Ram

Respondent

Rajendra Kumar and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
2009(3)WLN482

Excerpt

motor vehicles act, 1988 - section 168-accident claim-multiplier applicable-to a person aged 55 who died in accident, the appropriate multiplier will be 8 and not 3-thus computed compensation enhanced from rs. 67,600/- to rs. 1,66,000/- with interest. - .....of minimum of 8 should have been adopted by learned tribunal. he has also submitted that appropriate amount should also be awarded in the head of funeral expenses. 6. the deceased pema ram was 55 years old at the time of the accident. looking to the age of the deceased i am of the opinion that the appropriate multiplier is 8. if we adopt multiplier of 8 then the loss of income comes to rs. 1600x12x8 = rs. 1,53,600/-. rs. 2400 should be awarded for funeral expenses. if we add rs. 10,000/- on account of pain and suffering as awarded by learned tribunal then the total amount comes to rs. 1,53,600+ rs. 2400+ rs. 10,000/- = rs. 1,66,000. thus the appellant is entitled to a compensation of rs. 1,66,000/-.7. consequently, the appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above and the amount of compensation is enhanced from rs. 67,600/- to rs. 1,66,000/-. the claimant appellant will be entitled to interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing the application in the tribunal to the date of deposit/realisation on the enhanced amount. learned tribunal will pass necessary orders regarding payment/fixed deposit. no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

G.S. Sarraf, J.

1. The claimant appellant has filed this appeal against the award passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Neem-ka-Thana, district Sikar in Motor Accident Claim No. 50/91.

2. It is not necessary to narrate the entire facts as the only question before me is whether the compensation awarded in favour of the claimant appellant is just and reasonable.

3. One Pema Ram who is the father of the claimant appellant Neki Ram died in an accident on 17.02.1991. Admittedly the deceased was 55 years of age at the time of the accident. Learned Tribunal assessed the income of the deceased as Rs. 2400/- per month and after deducting 1/3 of it on account of personal expenses of the deceased awarded Rs. 1600X12X3=Rs.57,600/- for the loss of income and after adding Rs. 10,000/- for pain and suffering passed a total award of Rs. 67,600/- in favour of the claimant appellant.4. Heard learned Counsels for the parties.

5. Learned Counsel for the claimant appellant has submitted that the multiplier of 3 adopted by learned Tribunal is totally arbitrary as looking to the age of the deceased a multiplier of minimum of 8 should have been adopted by learned Tribunal. He has also submitted that appropriate amount should also be awarded in the head of funeral expenses.

6. The deceased Pema Ram was 55 years old at the time of the accident. Looking to the age of the deceased I am of the opinion that the appropriate multiplier is 8. If we adopt multiplier of 8 then the loss of income comes to Rs. 1600X12X8 = Rs. 1,53,600/-. Rs. 2400 should be awarded for funeral expenses. If we add Rs. 10,000/- on account of pain and suffering as awarded by learned Tribunal then the total amount comes to Rs. 1,53,600+ Rs. 2400+ Rs. 10,000/- = Rs. 1,66,000. Thus the appellant is entitled to a compensation of Rs. 1,66,000/-.

7. Consequently, the appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above and the amount of compensation is enhanced from Rs. 67,600/- to Rs. 1,66,000/-. The claimant appellant will be entitled to interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing the application in the Tribunal to the date of deposit/realisation on the enhanced amount. Learned Tribunal will pass necessary orders regarding payment/fixed deposit. No order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial