Rajasthan Court March 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
University of Rajasthan Vs. Surendra Kumar Goyal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-04-2003
Reported in: (2003)IIILLJ475Raj; RLW2003(2)Raj837; 2003(2)WLC578
Singh, C.J. 1. This civil special appeal is directed against the order of learned Single Judge dated 16th August, 2002 passed in S.B. Civil Writ petition No. 5797/1993.2. The facts He in a narrow compass. The respondent was appointed as Aquatic Coach by the appellant-University on 5th June, 1976. He was also confirmed on the post of Aquatic Coach vide order of University dated 18th March, 1991 w.e.f. 5th June, 1976. While in service of the appellant-University, the respondent on 12th December, 1980 was commissioned in the Territorial Army. Periodically, he used to be called to serve with the Territorial Army in consonance with the exigencies of service. In course of time, the respondent was promoted as Major in the Territorial Army. On 30th June, 1990, the services of the respondent were requisitioned by the Territorial Army for 'Operation Rakshak'. Pursuant to the requisitioning of his services by the Territorial Army, the University relieved him on 21st June, 1990, but relationship o...
Pappu Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-03-2003
Reported in: RLW2003(2)Raj828; 2004(4)WLC309; 2003(2)WLN380
Goyal, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner learned Public Prosecutor and perused the case diary. It was argued that articles of strithan have already been returned, learned Public Prosecutor States that same of the articles are stile to be returned. Although there is no mention of articles in F.I.R. as well as in the statement of the complainant. 2. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, it is just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 3. Therefore, the SHO of Police Station Thanagaji, Alwar is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Pappu Ram s/o Dhanna Ram in FIR No. 138/2002 of aforesaid police station be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with one sound surety of Rs. 20,000/- to the satisfaction of concerned SHO on the following conditions :- 1. that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Offi...
Savitri Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-03-2003
Reported in: 2004CriLJ201
O.P. Bishnoy, J.1. This revision petition has been filed against an order dated 20-1-2003 delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Jalore.2. An application under Section 319 of the Cr. P.C. was moved by the complainant in the said Court with a prayer that cognizance for the offences under Sections 376/34, 366/34 and 120B of the I.P.C. be taken against four accused persons named in the application.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that during the trial of the principal accused Dilip K. Vasu the petitioner was examined as a witness and she stated that Kailashpuri was the driver of the car in which she was taken away by Dilip K. Vasu. Further she deposed that the other accused persons Smt. Krishna Acharya, Shri Mahesh Sharma, Smt. Devki and Smt. Indra Kaur were also present and they instigated the principal accused Dilip K. Vasu to commit the offences.4. After going through the impugned order I find that there is no good ground to interfere in th...
Ramavtar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-03-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)WLN381
A.C. Goyal, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the case diary. It was argued that Govind Ram who as Sarpanch is said to have issued Patta in question is on anticipatory bail by this Court and the allegation against the present accused petitioner is that he got this Patta. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed it and contested that he is the main accused. I have considered the submission. Keeping in view the fact that Govind Ram has been enlarged on bail by his Court. It would not be proper to deny the bail to the present accused petitioner.2. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, it is just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 438, CrpC.3. Therefore, the SHO of Police Station Sanganer Sadar is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Ramawtar Sharma S/o Madan Lal in FIR No. 206/2001 of aforesaid police station be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the s...
Arun Kumar Srivastava Vs. R.P.S.C. and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-03-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)WLC51; 2003(3)WLN65
N.N. Mathur, J.1. Heard Mr. Dinesh Mehta learned counsel for the appellant and perused the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 29.1.2002 dismissing the writ petition on the ground of delay.2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission issued an advertisement on 31.5.2001 for appointment on the post of lecturer in 'Jainology', providing eligibility of Post Graduation in concerned Subject. The petitioner objected to said eligibility by submitting a representation to the Rajasthan Public Service Commission on the ground that the actual recruitment was for the post of Lecturer in Jeevan Vigyan and Jain Vidhya and there was no subject like Jainology. By a communication dated 24.11.2001, he was informed that his candidature has been rejected on twin grounds. Firstly that he was not Post Graduate in Jainology and secondly he had not passed NET/SLET. He also did not fulfil the eligibility conditions of acquiring M.Phil, or Ph.D. The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18.1.2002 challenging the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›